伊斯兰银行业绩(Maqasid Sharia Approach)

Inten Meutia, Shelly Febriana, Eka Meirawati
{"title":"伊斯兰银行业绩(Maqasid Sharia Approach)","authors":"Inten Meutia, Shelly Febriana, Eka Meirawati","doi":"10.33019/IJBE.V4I3.327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the performance of Islamic banks in Indonesia from the perspective of Maqasid Sharia. For this reason, this study uses two approaches, namely Maqasid Based Performance Evaluation Model (MPEM) and Performance Measurement based on Islamic Maqasid (PMMS). The use of these two approaches is to determine which approach is more appropriate for measuring the performance of Islamic banks. This research is a comparative study that will use a content analysis approach in exploring and analyzing Islamic bank performance data derived from annual reports. To identify bank performance, this study uses data sourced from the annual reports of 9 Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia for the period 2016 to 2019. A total of 36 annual reports analyzed in this study. The comparative analysis shows that performance measurement using the MPEM method resulted in higher performance outcomes than the PMMS method. This result proved significant at the five percent  level.","PeriodicalId":33131,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Journal of Business and Economics","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Islamic Bank Performance (Maqasid Sharia Approach)\",\"authors\":\"Inten Meutia, Shelly Febriana, Eka Meirawati\",\"doi\":\"10.33019/IJBE.V4I3.327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to analyze the performance of Islamic banks in Indonesia from the perspective of Maqasid Sharia. For this reason, this study uses two approaches, namely Maqasid Based Performance Evaluation Model (MPEM) and Performance Measurement based on Islamic Maqasid (PMMS). The use of these two approaches is to determine which approach is more appropriate for measuring the performance of Islamic banks. This research is a comparative study that will use a content analysis approach in exploring and analyzing Islamic bank performance data derived from annual reports. To identify bank performance, this study uses data sourced from the annual reports of 9 Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia for the period 2016 to 2019. A total of 36 annual reports analyzed in this study. The comparative analysis shows that performance measurement using the MPEM method resulted in higher performance outcomes than the PMMS method. This result proved significant at the five percent  level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrated Journal of Business and Economics\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrated Journal of Business and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33019/IJBE.V4I3.327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Journal of Business and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33019/IJBE.V4I3.327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在从伊斯兰教法的角度分析印尼伊斯兰银行的绩效。为此,本研究采用两种方法,即基于Maqasid的绩效评估模型(MPEM)和基于伊斯兰Maqasid的绩效测量(PMMS)。使用这两种方法是为了确定哪种方法更适合衡量伊斯兰银行的业绩。本研究是一项比较研究,将使用内容分析方法来探索和分析来自年度报告的伊斯兰银行绩效数据。为了确定银行绩效,本研究使用了来自印度尼西亚9家伊斯兰商业银行2016年至2019年年度报告的数据。本研究共分析了36份年报。对比分析表明,使用MPEM方法进行绩效评估比使用PMMS方法获得更高的绩效结果。这个结果在5%的水平上被证明是显著的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Islamic Bank Performance (Maqasid Sharia Approach)
This study aims to analyze the performance of Islamic banks in Indonesia from the perspective of Maqasid Sharia. For this reason, this study uses two approaches, namely Maqasid Based Performance Evaluation Model (MPEM) and Performance Measurement based on Islamic Maqasid (PMMS). The use of these two approaches is to determine which approach is more appropriate for measuring the performance of Islamic banks. This research is a comparative study that will use a content analysis approach in exploring and analyzing Islamic bank performance data derived from annual reports. To identify bank performance, this study uses data sourced from the annual reports of 9 Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia for the period 2016 to 2019. A total of 36 annual reports analyzed in this study. The comparative analysis shows that performance measurement using the MPEM method resulted in higher performance outcomes than the PMMS method. This result proved significant at the five percent  level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Annual Report Readability, Carbon Emission Disclosure and Green Accounting Practices on Company Value How do digital financial literacy, financial behavior, and skills affect financial well-being? An Exploratory Study on Gen Z Testing of the Structure-Conduct-Performance Hypothesis for Industrial Banking Profitability: Evidence from Indonesia The comparison of islamic and conventional banking in ownership structure and interest rates in Indonesia Saving and Investment Nexus in Indonesia: Revisiting Feldstein-Horioka Hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1