{"title":"比较远程协作的指向和绘图","authors":"Seungwon Kim, Gun A. Lee, Nobuchika Sakata","doi":"10.1109/ISMAR.2013.6671833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research, we explore using pointing and drawing in a remote collaboration system. Our application allows a local user with a tablet to communicate with a remote expert on a desktop computer. We compared performance in four conditions: (1) Pointers on Still Image, (2) Pointers on Live Video, (3) Annotation on Still Image, and (4) Annotation on Live Video. We found that using drawing annotations would require fewer inputs on an expert side, and would require less cognitive load on the local worker side. In a follow-on study we compared the conditions (2) and (4) using a more complicated task. We found that pointing input requires good verbal communication to be effective and that drawing annotations need to be erased after completing each step of a task.","PeriodicalId":92225,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality : (ISMAR) [proceedings]. IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing pointing and drawing for remote collaboration\",\"authors\":\"Seungwon Kim, Gun A. Lee, Nobuchika Sakata\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMAR.2013.6671833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this research, we explore using pointing and drawing in a remote collaboration system. Our application allows a local user with a tablet to communicate with a remote expert on a desktop computer. We compared performance in four conditions: (1) Pointers on Still Image, (2) Pointers on Live Video, (3) Annotation on Still Image, and (4) Annotation on Live Video. We found that using drawing annotations would require fewer inputs on an expert side, and would require less cognitive load on the local worker side. In a follow-on study we compared the conditions (2) and (4) using a more complicated task. We found that pointing input requires good verbal communication to be effective and that drawing annotations need to be erased after completing each step of a task.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality : (ISMAR) [proceedings]. IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality : (ISMAR) [proceedings]. IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2013.6671833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality : (ISMAR) [proceedings]. IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2013.6671833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

在本研究中,我们探索了在远程协作系统中使用指向和绘图。我们的应用程序允许使用平板电脑的本地用户与桌面计算机上的远程专家进行通信。我们比较了四种情况下的性能:(1)静态图像上的指针,(2)实时视频上的指针,(3)静态图像上的注释,(4)实时视频上的注释。我们发现,使用绘图注释在专家方面需要更少的输入,并且在本地工作人员方面需要更少的认知负荷。在后续研究中,我们使用更复杂的任务比较了条件(2)和条件(4)。我们发现,指示输入需要良好的口头沟通才能有效,而绘图注释需要在完成任务的每一步后删除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing pointing and drawing for remote collaboration
In this research, we explore using pointing and drawing in a remote collaboration system. Our application allows a local user with a tablet to communicate with a remote expert on a desktop computer. We compared performance in four conditions: (1) Pointers on Still Image, (2) Pointers on Live Video, (3) Annotation on Still Image, and (4) Annotation on Live Video. We found that using drawing annotations would require fewer inputs on an expert side, and would require less cognitive load on the local worker side. In a follow-on study we compared the conditions (2) and (4) using a more complicated task. We found that pointing input requires good verbal communication to be effective and that drawing annotations need to be erased after completing each step of a task.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Keynote Speakers Message from the ISMAR 2022 Science and Technology Conference Program Chairs An Intelligent Augmented Reality Training Framework for Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation. Message from the ISMAR 2020 Workshop and Tutorial Chairs AR4VI: AR as an Accessibility Tool for People with Visual Impairments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1