淋巴细胞/单核细胞比值及营养指数对CA125正常卵巢癌患者的预后价值

Songwei Feng, Shanhui Luo, Chenchen Ji, Yi Li
{"title":"淋巴细胞/单核细胞比值及营养指数对CA125正常卵巢癌患者的预后价值","authors":"Songwei Feng, Shanhui Luo, Chenchen Ji, Yi Li","doi":"10.31038/cst.2021611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"this index was originally examined. In this study, a low NI was seen as a poor survival predictor. Abstract Background: Ovarian Cancer (OC) cases with low CA-125 concentration during routine physical examination testing are troublesome and raise false negative findings ratio. The aim of this analysis was to determine whether the Lymphocyte-To-Monocyte Ratio (LMR) and the Nutritional Index (NI) of OC patients with normal CA-125 levels had a predictive role. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled a total of 102 OC-diagnosed patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy from 2010 to 2019. Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves (ROC) for survival analysis, optimum cut-off values for NI and LMR were calculated. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve and Cox regression determined the prognostic value for Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS). Results: The results showed that the optimal cutoff values were 47.5 and 4.25, respectively, for NI and LMR. NI was shown to be significantly correlated with FIGO stage, Grade, the involvement of malignant ascites, and platinum response, and LMR with FIGO stage, lymph node metastasis, malignant ascites, and platinum response when the population was separated using optimized cut-off. The 5-year OS and PFS were greatly enhanced by a high NI ( ≧ 47.5). A low LMR (<4.25) was associated significantly with poor 5-year PFS and OS. Both NI and LMR were independent prognosticators for the 5-year OS in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In CA125-normal ovarian cancer cases, elevated NI and LMR are positive prognosticators.","PeriodicalId":72517,"journal":{"name":"Cancer studies and therapeutics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Nutritional Index for Ovarian Cancer Patients with Normal CA125 Level\",\"authors\":\"Songwei Feng, Shanhui Luo, Chenchen Ji, Yi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.31038/cst.2021611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"this index was originally examined. In this study, a low NI was seen as a poor survival predictor. Abstract Background: Ovarian Cancer (OC) cases with low CA-125 concentration during routine physical examination testing are troublesome and raise false negative findings ratio. The aim of this analysis was to determine whether the Lymphocyte-To-Monocyte Ratio (LMR) and the Nutritional Index (NI) of OC patients with normal CA-125 levels had a predictive role. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled a total of 102 OC-diagnosed patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy from 2010 to 2019. Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves (ROC) for survival analysis, optimum cut-off values for NI and LMR were calculated. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve and Cox regression determined the prognostic value for Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS). Results: The results showed that the optimal cutoff values were 47.5 and 4.25, respectively, for NI and LMR. NI was shown to be significantly correlated with FIGO stage, Grade, the involvement of malignant ascites, and platinum response, and LMR with FIGO stage, lymph node metastasis, malignant ascites, and platinum response when the population was separated using optimized cut-off. The 5-year OS and PFS were greatly enhanced by a high NI ( ≧ 47.5). A low LMR (<4.25) was associated significantly with poor 5-year PFS and OS. Both NI and LMR were independent prognosticators for the 5-year OS in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In CA125-normal ovarian cancer cases, elevated NI and LMR are positive prognosticators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer studies and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer studies and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31038/cst.2021611\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer studies and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/cst.2021611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个指数最初是检查过的。在这项研究中,低NI被视为较差的生存预测因子。摘要背景:卵巢癌(OC)常规体检中CA-125浓度过低是困扰患者的问题,容易引起假阴性结果。本分析的目的是确定CA-125水平正常的OC患者的淋巴细胞与单核细胞比率(LMR)和营养指数(NI)是否具有预测作用。方法:本回顾性研究共纳入102例2010 - 2019年接受原发性细胞减少手术和辅助铂基化疗的oc诊断患者。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)进行生存分析,计算NI和LMR的最佳临界值。Kaplan-Meier (KM)曲线和Cox回归确定了总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的预后价值。结果:NI和LMR的最佳临界值分别为47.5和4.25。使用优化的截止值对人群进行分离时,NI与FIGO分期、分级、恶性腹水累及铂类药物反应显著相关,LMR与FIGO分期、淋巴结转移、恶性腹水和铂类药物反应显著相关。高NI(≧47.5)显著提高5年OS和PFS。低LMR(<4.25)与较差的5年PFS和OS显著相关。在多变量分析中,NI和LMR都是5年OS的独立预测指标。结论:在ca125正常的卵巢癌病例中,NI和LMR升高是阳性预后指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Nutritional Index for Ovarian Cancer Patients with Normal CA125 Level
this index was originally examined. In this study, a low NI was seen as a poor survival predictor. Abstract Background: Ovarian Cancer (OC) cases with low CA-125 concentration during routine physical examination testing are troublesome and raise false negative findings ratio. The aim of this analysis was to determine whether the Lymphocyte-To-Monocyte Ratio (LMR) and the Nutritional Index (NI) of OC patients with normal CA-125 levels had a predictive role. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled a total of 102 OC-diagnosed patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy from 2010 to 2019. Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves (ROC) for survival analysis, optimum cut-off values for NI and LMR were calculated. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve and Cox regression determined the prognostic value for Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS). Results: The results showed that the optimal cutoff values were 47.5 and 4.25, respectively, for NI and LMR. NI was shown to be significantly correlated with FIGO stage, Grade, the involvement of malignant ascites, and platinum response, and LMR with FIGO stage, lymph node metastasis, malignant ascites, and platinum response when the population was separated using optimized cut-off. The 5-year OS and PFS were greatly enhanced by a high NI ( ≧ 47.5). A low LMR (<4.25) was associated significantly with poor 5-year PFS and OS. Both NI and LMR were independent prognosticators for the 5-year OS in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In CA125-normal ovarian cancer cases, elevated NI and LMR are positive prognosticators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fertility Preservation Among Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Hot Topic High XPO1 Expression can Stratify Gastric Cancer Patients with Poor Clinical Outcome Enhancing Patient-Centered Care in Leukemia Treatment: Insights Generated by a Mind-Set Framework Co-developed with AI Berkeley, Anti-Semitism, and AI-Suggested Remedies: Current Thinking and a Future Opportunity Three AI-synthesized Mind-sets of Patients Talking to Their Surgeon about a Prospective Operation for Different Types of Diagnosed Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1