成功,但不过分:管理网络效应下的平台互补

Shiva Agarwal, Cameron D. Miller, Martin Ganco
{"title":"成功,但不过分:管理网络效应下的平台互补","authors":"Shiva Agarwal, Cameron D. Miller, Martin Ganco","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3933965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Firms that own platforms often actively manage firms that offer products through the platform (i.e., platform complementors). To manage complementors, platform owners tend to have fewer tools available at their disposal relative to traditional organizations. Prior work has started examining how platform owners achieve both value creation and appropriation using novel tools such as product endorsements. We extend the literature by developing a theoretical framework on the role of direct network effects of the products introduced through the platform. We test our predictions using a detailed dataset of game apps introduced on the Apple’s app store and examine which apps received Apple’s prestigious Editors’ Choice Awards given at the time of introduction. We find that apps with network effects are more likely to receive the award. This likelihood increases when the app is introduced by a developer with a larger market share but is lower if the app was introduced in a concentrated segment. The likelihood decreases further if the app is introduced in a concentrated segment by a developer that holds a larger market share. We also observe that in concentrated segments, the “challenger” developers have a higher likelihood of receiving the award relative to","PeriodicalId":18516,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Production","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Successful, but not Too Much: Managing Platform Complementors in the Presence of Network Effects\",\"authors\":\"Shiva Agarwal, Cameron D. Miller, Martin Ganco\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3933965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Firms that own platforms often actively manage firms that offer products through the platform (i.e., platform complementors). To manage complementors, platform owners tend to have fewer tools available at their disposal relative to traditional organizations. Prior work has started examining how platform owners achieve both value creation and appropriation using novel tools such as product endorsements. We extend the literature by developing a theoretical framework on the role of direct network effects of the products introduced through the platform. We test our predictions using a detailed dataset of game apps introduced on the Apple’s app store and examine which apps received Apple’s prestigious Editors’ Choice Awards given at the time of introduction. We find that apps with network effects are more likely to receive the award. This likelihood increases when the app is introduced by a developer with a larger market share but is lower if the app was introduced in a concentrated segment. The likelihood decreases further if the app is introduced in a concentrated segment by a developer that holds a larger market share. We also observe that in concentrated segments, the “challenger” developers have a higher likelihood of receiving the award relative to\",\"PeriodicalId\":18516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microeconomics: Production\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microeconomics: Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3933965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3933965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拥有平台的公司通常积极管理通过平台提供产品的公司(即平台互补者)。为了管理补充品,平台所有者倾向于拥有比传统组织更少的可用工具。之前的工作已经开始研究平台所有者如何使用产品代言等新工具来实现价值创造和挪用。我们通过开发一个关于通过平台引入的产品的直接网络效应作用的理论框架来扩展文献。我们使用苹果应用商店介绍的游戏应用的详细数据集来测试我们的预测,并检查哪些应用在介绍时获得了苹果著名的编辑选择奖。我们发现,具有网络效应的应用更有可能获得该奖项。当应用由拥有较大市场份额的开发商推出时,这种可能性会增加,但如果应用是在一个集中的细分市场推出,这种可能性就会降低。如果应用是由拥有更大市场份额的开发商在一个集中的细分市场中推出,那么这种可能性就会进一步降低。我们还观察到,在集中细分市场中,“挑战者”开发者获得奖励的可能性更高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Successful, but not Too Much: Managing Platform Complementors in the Presence of Network Effects
Firms that own platforms often actively manage firms that offer products through the platform (i.e., platform complementors). To manage complementors, platform owners tend to have fewer tools available at their disposal relative to traditional organizations. Prior work has started examining how platform owners achieve both value creation and appropriation using novel tools such as product endorsements. We extend the literature by developing a theoretical framework on the role of direct network effects of the products introduced through the platform. We test our predictions using a detailed dataset of game apps introduced on the Apple’s app store and examine which apps received Apple’s prestigious Editors’ Choice Awards given at the time of introduction. We find that apps with network effects are more likely to receive the award. This likelihood increases when the app is introduced by a developer with a larger market share but is lower if the app was introduced in a concentrated segment. The likelihood decreases further if the app is introduced in a concentrated segment by a developer that holds a larger market share. We also observe that in concentrated segments, the “challenger” developers have a higher likelihood of receiving the award relative to
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pricing the Pharmaceuticals When the Ability to Pay Differs: Taking Vertical Equity Seriously Dual Role Platforms and Search Order Distortion Monopoly, Product Quality and Information Disclosure Production Approach Markup Estimators Often Measure Input Wedges Successful, but not Too Much: Managing Platform Complementors in the Presence of Network Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1