K. Kikkawa, H. Hoshi, A. Isoda, Kazuya Okada, Junichi Okada, Takuya Watanabe, Eijiro Yamada, Kihachi Ohshima, S. Okada
{"title":"长效胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂诱导的2型糖尿病患者类风湿关节炎","authors":"K. Kikkawa, H. Hoshi, A. Isoda, Kazuya Okada, Junichi Okada, Takuya Watanabe, Eijiro Yamada, Kihachi Ohshima, S. Okada","doi":"10.1159/000519008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Case Presentation: We report a case of a male patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosed during treatment with a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (once-weekly dulaglutide injection). At 3 months after dulaglutide initiation, he began experiencing left shoulder pain that continued despite treatment by an acupuncturist, indicating that the pain was not due to periarthritis scapulohumeralis. His HbA1c level was 7.3% at the 3-month follow-up. At the 6-month follow-up visit, the HbA1c level was 8.2%, the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 132 mg/dL, and he expressed right shoulder pain. After 3 months, the HbA1c level was 9.0%, and his bilateral shoulder pain worsened, due to which he could not use his arms well. Routine laboratory testing revealed no other abnormalities at that time. However, several inflammatory and serological RA markers were detected, including an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 73 (normal range, <10) mm/h, a C-reactive protein level of 1.89 (normal range, 0.0–0.14) mg/dL, a rheumatoid factor level of 26 (normal range, 0–15) IU/mL, and an anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibody level of 195 (normal range, <4.5) U/mL. However, tests for antinuclear antibodies, anti-SS-A/Ro antibodies, and anti-RNP antibodies showed negative results. He was diagnosed with RA, and salazosulfapyridine (500 mg/day) was started. At 1 month after RA treatment initiation, his shoulder pain began showing improvement and improved HbA1c levels from 9.0% to 8.0%. Discussion: Thus, this case report suggests an association between RA and GLP-1. Based on a literature search in PubMed, we believe that this case report is the first to demonstrate that a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with a long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist had RA. However, further research is needed to determine whether RA is one of the adverse effects of long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists. Conclusion: During treatment with long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists, it is necessary to consider the possibility of RA as a differential diagnosis when patients complain of persistent joint pain.","PeriodicalId":34679,"journal":{"name":"Dubai Diabetes and Endocrinology Journal","volume":"3 2-3 1","pages":"114 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Acting Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist-Induced Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Patient with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus\",\"authors\":\"K. Kikkawa, H. Hoshi, A. Isoda, Kazuya Okada, Junichi Okada, Takuya Watanabe, Eijiro Yamada, Kihachi Ohshima, S. Okada\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000519008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Case Presentation: We report a case of a male patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosed during treatment with a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (once-weekly dulaglutide injection). At 3 months after dulaglutide initiation, he began experiencing left shoulder pain that continued despite treatment by an acupuncturist, indicating that the pain was not due to periarthritis scapulohumeralis. His HbA1c level was 7.3% at the 3-month follow-up. At the 6-month follow-up visit, the HbA1c level was 8.2%, the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 132 mg/dL, and he expressed right shoulder pain. After 3 months, the HbA1c level was 9.0%, and his bilateral shoulder pain worsened, due to which he could not use his arms well. Routine laboratory testing revealed no other abnormalities at that time. However, several inflammatory and serological RA markers were detected, including an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 73 (normal range, <10) mm/h, a C-reactive protein level of 1.89 (normal range, 0.0–0.14) mg/dL, a rheumatoid factor level of 26 (normal range, 0–15) IU/mL, and an anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibody level of 195 (normal range, <4.5) U/mL. However, tests for antinuclear antibodies, anti-SS-A/Ro antibodies, and anti-RNP antibodies showed negative results. He was diagnosed with RA, and salazosulfapyridine (500 mg/day) was started. At 1 month after RA treatment initiation, his shoulder pain began showing improvement and improved HbA1c levels from 9.0% to 8.0%. Discussion: Thus, this case report suggests an association between RA and GLP-1. Based on a literature search in PubMed, we believe that this case report is the first to demonstrate that a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with a long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist had RA. However, further research is needed to determine whether RA is one of the adverse effects of long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists. Conclusion: During treatment with long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists, it is necessary to consider the possibility of RA as a differential diagnosis when patients complain of persistent joint pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dubai Diabetes and Endocrinology Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 2-3 1\",\"pages\":\"114 - 117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dubai Diabetes and Endocrinology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dubai Diabetes and Endocrinology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
病例介绍:我们报告一例患有类风湿性关节炎(RA)的男性患者在接受长效胰高血糖素样肽-1 (GLP-1)受体激动剂(每周一次的杜拉鲁肽注射)治疗期间被诊断出来。在杜拉鲁肽开始治疗3个月后,他开始经历左肩疼痛,尽管针灸师治疗,但疼痛仍在继续,这表明疼痛不是由于肩周炎引起的。3个月随访时HbA1c水平为7.3%。随访6个月,HbA1c水平为8.2%,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平为132 mg/dL,表现为右肩疼痛。3个月后,HbA1c水平为9.0%,双侧肩部疼痛加重,无法正常使用手臂。当时的常规实验室检查没有发现其他异常。然而,检测到几种炎症和血清学RA标志物,包括红细胞沉降率73(正常范围,<10)mm/h, c反应蛋白水平1.89(正常范围,0.0-0.14)mg/dL,类风湿因子水平26(正常范围,0-15)IU/mL,抗环瓜氨酸蛋白抗体水平195(正常范围,<4.5)U/mL。然而,抗核抗体、抗ss - a /Ro抗体和抗rnp抗体的检测结果均为阴性。他被诊断为类风湿性关节炎,并开始使用萨拉唑磺胺吡啶(500 mg/天)。在RA治疗开始1个月后,他的肩痛开始改善,HbA1c水平从9.0%改善到8.0%。讨论:因此,本病例报告提示RA与GLP-1之间存在关联。根据PubMed的文献检索,我们认为该病例报告是第一个证明2型糖尿病患者接受长效GLP-1受体激动剂治疗患有RA的病例。然而,RA是否是长效GLP-1受体激动剂的不良反应之一还需要进一步研究。结论:在使用长效GLP-1受体激动剂治疗时,当患者主诉持续关节疼痛时,有必要考虑RA的可能性作为鉴别诊断。
Long-Acting Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist-Induced Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Patient with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Case Presentation: We report a case of a male patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosed during treatment with a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (once-weekly dulaglutide injection). At 3 months after dulaglutide initiation, he began experiencing left shoulder pain that continued despite treatment by an acupuncturist, indicating that the pain was not due to periarthritis scapulohumeralis. His HbA1c level was 7.3% at the 3-month follow-up. At the 6-month follow-up visit, the HbA1c level was 8.2%, the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 132 mg/dL, and he expressed right shoulder pain. After 3 months, the HbA1c level was 9.0%, and his bilateral shoulder pain worsened, due to which he could not use his arms well. Routine laboratory testing revealed no other abnormalities at that time. However, several inflammatory and serological RA markers were detected, including an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 73 (normal range, <10) mm/h, a C-reactive protein level of 1.89 (normal range, 0.0–0.14) mg/dL, a rheumatoid factor level of 26 (normal range, 0–15) IU/mL, and an anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibody level of 195 (normal range, <4.5) U/mL. However, tests for antinuclear antibodies, anti-SS-A/Ro antibodies, and anti-RNP antibodies showed negative results. He was diagnosed with RA, and salazosulfapyridine (500 mg/day) was started. At 1 month after RA treatment initiation, his shoulder pain began showing improvement and improved HbA1c levels from 9.0% to 8.0%. Discussion: Thus, this case report suggests an association between RA and GLP-1. Based on a literature search in PubMed, we believe that this case report is the first to demonstrate that a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with a long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist had RA. However, further research is needed to determine whether RA is one of the adverse effects of long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists. Conclusion: During treatment with long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists, it is necessary to consider the possibility of RA as a differential diagnosis when patients complain of persistent joint pain.