极简主义的不同色调:英澳和英新自由贸易协定中劳动条款的多边构建

Ioannis Katsaroumpas
{"title":"极简主义的不同色调:英澳和英新自由贸易协定中劳动条款的多边构建","authors":"Ioannis Katsaroumpas","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2023.2199467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recently concluded UK free trade agreements with Australia (UKAFTA) and New Zealand (UKNZFTA) merit close scrutiny. As the first UK FTAs to be negotiated from scratch after Brexit, they provide concrete evidence of the UK’s formative approach towards the trade-labour linkage. They follow the ambitious EU-UK Trade & Co-operation Agreement (TCA), commended for the width and strength of its multilateral labour commitments. However, the exceptional circumstances surrounding its conclusion, namely the need to avert a no-deal Brexit and the fact of the previous deep alignment between the UK and EU legal systems, rendered its treatment as precedent-setting premature without further evidence from subsequent agreements. There exists a vast multi-disciplinary literature on labour clauses in trade agreements. While trade law scholars tend to debate the protectionist effect of these clauses on trade, labour scholars focus on assessing their instrumental effect on protecting labour rights","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"23 1","pages":"71 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different shades of minimalism: The multilateral construction of labour clauses in the UK-Australia and UK-New Zealand FTAs\",\"authors\":\"Ioannis Katsaroumpas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09615768.2023.2199467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recently concluded UK free trade agreements with Australia (UKAFTA) and New Zealand (UKNZFTA) merit close scrutiny. As the first UK FTAs to be negotiated from scratch after Brexit, they provide concrete evidence of the UK’s formative approach towards the trade-labour linkage. They follow the ambitious EU-UK Trade & Co-operation Agreement (TCA), commended for the width and strength of its multilateral labour commitments. However, the exceptional circumstances surrounding its conclusion, namely the need to avert a no-deal Brexit and the fact of the previous deep alignment between the UK and EU legal systems, rendered its treatment as precedent-setting premature without further evidence from subsequent agreements. There exists a vast multi-disciplinary literature on labour clauses in trade agreements. While trade law scholars tend to debate the protectionist effect of these clauses on trade, labour scholars focus on assessing their instrumental effect on protecting labour rights\",\"PeriodicalId\":88025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"71 - 104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2023.2199467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2023.2199467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近英国与澳大利亚(UKAFTA)和新西兰(UKNZFTA)达成的自由贸易协定值得密切关注。作为英国脱欧后首个从零开始谈判的自由贸易协定,它们为英国对贸易-劳动力联系的形成方法提供了具体证据。它们遵循雄心勃勃的欧盟-英国贸易与合作协定(TCA),该协定因其多边劳工承诺的广度和力度而受到称赞。然而,围绕该协议达成的特殊情况,即避免无协议脱欧的必要性,以及英国和欧盟法律体系此前的深度契合,使得在没有后续协议进一步证据的情况下,将其视为先例尚不成熟。关于贸易协定中的劳动条款,存在着大量多学科的文献。贸易法学者倾向于争论这些条款对贸易的保护主义作用,而劳工学者则侧重于评估它们在保护劳工权利方面的工具作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Different shades of minimalism: The multilateral construction of labour clauses in the UK-Australia and UK-New Zealand FTAs
The recently concluded UK free trade agreements with Australia (UKAFTA) and New Zealand (UKNZFTA) merit close scrutiny. As the first UK FTAs to be negotiated from scratch after Brexit, they provide concrete evidence of the UK’s formative approach towards the trade-labour linkage. They follow the ambitious EU-UK Trade & Co-operation Agreement (TCA), commended for the width and strength of its multilateral labour commitments. However, the exceptional circumstances surrounding its conclusion, namely the need to avert a no-deal Brexit and the fact of the previous deep alignment between the UK and EU legal systems, rendered its treatment as precedent-setting premature without further evidence from subsequent agreements. There exists a vast multi-disciplinary literature on labour clauses in trade agreements. While trade law scholars tend to debate the protectionist effect of these clauses on trade, labour scholars focus on assessing their instrumental effect on protecting labour rights
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unity in diversity? Constitutional identities, deliberative processes and a ‘Border Poll’ in Ireland The Nation vs. the People. The unconstitutionality of secessionist referendums under Belgian constitutional law The impact of federalism on secession referendums: comparing Scotland and Québec Assessing the Legitimacy of Referendums as a Vehicle for Constitutional Amendment: Reform and Abolition of the Legislative Councils in Queensland and New South Wales Referendums and representation in democratic constitution making: Lessons from the failed Chilean constitutional experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1