Man Zhu, Yingchao Wang, Xuefang Liu, Xue Wen, Chunzi Liang, Jiancheng Tu
{"title":"LncRNAs作为胃癌预后的生物标志物:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Man Zhu, Yingchao Wang, Xuefang Liu, Xue Wen, Chunzi Liang, Jiancheng Tu","doi":"10.1016/j.flm.2017.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients is extremely low and to find a new marker is urgently needed. Increasing studies indicate that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are abnormally expressed in GC. However, the results of these studies were conflicting and inconclusive, especially in the aspects of tumor prognosis. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the clinical values, including prognosis and clinicopathology of different lncRNAs in GC. A total of 38 studies including 34 on OS, 17 on disease-free survival (DFS), 1 on progression-free survival (PFS), 1 on disease-specific survival (DSS), and 34 on clinicopathological features were identified from the databases. Our results indicated that the levels of lncRNAs were associated with the OS (hazard ratios [HR]<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.44, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.23–1.69, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), PFS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.32, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.10–5.28, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) and DSS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.65, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.53–3.60, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009). However, there was no relationship between lncRNAs and DFS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.25, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.90–1.74, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.11). Moreover, lncRNAs were related to lymph node metastasis (odds ratios [OR]<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.67, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.21–2.31, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002) and TNM (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.93, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.27–2.92, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). In conclusion, our present meta-analysis indicated that lncRNAs could function as potential prognostic markers in GC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100555,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 59-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.flm.2017.05.003","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LncRNAs act as prognostic biomarkers in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Man Zhu, Yingchao Wang, Xuefang Liu, Xue Wen, Chunzi Liang, Jiancheng Tu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.flm.2017.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients is extremely low and to find a new marker is urgently needed. Increasing studies indicate that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are abnormally expressed in GC. However, the results of these studies were conflicting and inconclusive, especially in the aspects of tumor prognosis. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the clinical values, including prognosis and clinicopathology of different lncRNAs in GC. A total of 38 studies including 34 on OS, 17 on disease-free survival (DFS), 1 on progression-free survival (PFS), 1 on disease-specific survival (DSS), and 34 on clinicopathological features were identified from the databases. Our results indicated that the levels of lncRNAs were associated with the OS (hazard ratios [HR]<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.44, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.23–1.69, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), PFS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.32, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.10–5.28, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) and DSS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.65, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.53–3.60, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009). However, there was no relationship between lncRNAs and DFS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.25, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.90–1.74, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.11). Moreover, lncRNAs were related to lymph node metastasis (odds ratios [OR]<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.67, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.21–2.31, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002) and TNM (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.93, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.27–2.92, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). In conclusion, our present meta-analysis indicated that lncRNAs could function as potential prognostic markers in GC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 59-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.flm.2017.05.003\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542364917300572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542364917300572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
胃癌(GC)是癌症相关死亡的主要原因之一。患者的5年总生存率(OS)极低,迫切需要寻找新的标志物。越来越多的研究表明,长链非编码rna (lncRNAs)在GC中异常表达。然而,这些研究的结果是相互矛盾和不确定的,特别是在肿瘤预后方面。因此,我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以探讨不同lncrna在GC中的临床价值,包括预后和临床病理。共有38项研究,包括34项OS, 17项无病生存期(DFS), 1项无进展生存期(PFS), 1项疾病特异性生存期(DSS)和34项临床病理特征。我们的结果表明lncrna水平与OS相关(风险比[HR] = 1.44, 95%可信区间[95% CI] = 1.23-1.69, P <0.001), PFS (HR = 2.32, 95% CI -5.28 = 1.10, P = 0.001)和DSS (HR = 2.65, 95% CI -3.60 = 1.53, P = 0.009)。然而,lncRNAs与DFS之间没有关系(HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.90-1.74, P = 0.11)。此外,lncRNAs与淋巴结转移(比值比[OR] = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.21-2.31, P = 0.002)和TNM(比值比[OR] = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.27-2.92, P <0.001)。总之,我们目前的荟萃分析表明,lncrna可以作为胃癌的潜在预后标志物。
LncRNAs act as prognostic biomarkers in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients is extremely low and to find a new marker is urgently needed. Increasing studies indicate that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are abnormally expressed in GC. However, the results of these studies were conflicting and inconclusive, especially in the aspects of tumor prognosis. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the clinical values, including prognosis and clinicopathology of different lncRNAs in GC. A total of 38 studies including 34 on OS, 17 on disease-free survival (DFS), 1 on progression-free survival (PFS), 1 on disease-specific survival (DSS), and 34 on clinicopathological features were identified from the databases. Our results indicated that the levels of lncRNAs were associated with the OS (hazard ratios [HR] = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.23–1.69, P < 0.001), PFS (HR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.10–5.28, P = 0.001) and DSS (HR = 2.65, 95% CI = 1.53–3.60, P = 0.009). However, there was no relationship between lncRNAs and DFS (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.90–1.74, P = 0.11). Moreover, lncRNAs were related to lymph node metastasis (odds ratios [OR] = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.21–2.31, P = 0.002) and TNM (OR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.27–2.92, P < 0.001). In conclusion, our present meta-analysis indicated that lncRNAs could function as potential prognostic markers in GC.