与细菌培养相关的临床信息证实,在布里拉姆省的鼻疽病患者中存在假马利氏伯克氏菌

Worrayot Darasawang
{"title":"与细菌培养相关的临床信息证实,在布里拉姆省的鼻疽病患者中存在假马利氏伯克氏菌","authors":"Worrayot Darasawang","doi":"10.55131/jphd/2023/210303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA) is a general rapid diagnosis procedure in melioidosis patients combined with clinical information. The Burkholderia pseudomallei culture technique requires prolonged time before getting culture results. Related factors of bacterial culture proven melioidosis and the appropriate cut-off point for IHA are unfashionable and need to be updated. A cross-sectional study was conducted among melioidosis patients using data reported in the medical records. Univariable analysis was performed by Chi-square test and Student T-test as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was finally used to identify the contributing factors to bacterial culture proven cases. The results were shown as adjusted odds ratio (AdjOR) and 95%CI. Validity domains, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios at each cut-off point for IHA were demonstrated. The results revealed that after adjustment for abdominal pain symptoms, diabetes mellitus (DM)(p-value < 0.001) and dyspnea symptoms (p-value = 0.025) were the associated factors of bacterial culture proven cases. The IHA titer > 1: 10240 provided the highest positive and negative predictive values, 30% and 69% respectively. Both positive and negative likelihood ratios of this cut-off point were also accounted for as 0.95 and 1.003, respectively. Health personnel should perform melioidosis diagnosis by the use of clinical information and an appropriate cut-off point for IHA, especially in diabetic patients who have dyspnea.","PeriodicalId":36393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health and Development","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical information associated with bacterial culture proven Burkholderia pseudomallei among melioiodosis patients in Buriram province\",\"authors\":\"Worrayot Darasawang\",\"doi\":\"10.55131/jphd/2023/210303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA) is a general rapid diagnosis procedure in melioidosis patients combined with clinical information. The Burkholderia pseudomallei culture technique requires prolonged time before getting culture results. Related factors of bacterial culture proven melioidosis and the appropriate cut-off point for IHA are unfashionable and need to be updated. A cross-sectional study was conducted among melioidosis patients using data reported in the medical records. Univariable analysis was performed by Chi-square test and Student T-test as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was finally used to identify the contributing factors to bacterial culture proven cases. The results were shown as adjusted odds ratio (AdjOR) and 95%CI. Validity domains, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios at each cut-off point for IHA were demonstrated. The results revealed that after adjustment for abdominal pain symptoms, diabetes mellitus (DM)(p-value < 0.001) and dyspnea symptoms (p-value = 0.025) were the associated factors of bacterial culture proven cases. The IHA titer > 1: 10240 provided the highest positive and negative predictive values, 30% and 69% respectively. Both positive and negative likelihood ratios of this cut-off point were also accounted for as 0.95 and 1.003, respectively. Health personnel should perform melioidosis diagnosis by the use of clinical information and an appropriate cut-off point for IHA, especially in diabetic patients who have dyspnea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health and Development\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55131/jphd/2023/210303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55131/jphd/2023/210303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

间接血凝试验(IHA)是结合临床资料对类鼻疽患者进行快速诊断的常用方法。假马利氏伯克霍尔德菌培养技术需要较长的时间才能得到培养结果。细菌培养证实类鼻疽的相关因素和IHA的适当分界点是过时的,需要更新。在类鼻疽患者中进行了一项横断面研究,使用了医疗记录中的数据。单变量分析酌情采用卡方检验和学生t检验。最后使用多变量逻辑回归来确定细菌培养证实病例的影响因素。结果显示为校正优势比(AdjOR)和95%CI。证明了IHA的有效性域、敏感性、特异性、预测值和每个截断点的似然比。结果显示,调整腹痛症状后,糖尿病(DM)(p值< 0.001)和呼吸困难症状(p值= 0.025)是细菌培养证实病例的相关因素。IHA滴度bb0.1: 10240的阳性预测值和阴性预测值最高,分别为30%和69%。该截断点的正似然比和负似然比也分别为0.95和1.003。卫生人员应利用临床信息和适当的IHA分界点进行类鼻疽病诊断,特别是对有呼吸困难的糖尿病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical information associated with bacterial culture proven Burkholderia pseudomallei among melioiodosis patients in Buriram province
Indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA) is a general rapid diagnosis procedure in melioidosis patients combined with clinical information. The Burkholderia pseudomallei culture technique requires prolonged time before getting culture results. Related factors of bacterial culture proven melioidosis and the appropriate cut-off point for IHA are unfashionable and need to be updated. A cross-sectional study was conducted among melioidosis patients using data reported in the medical records. Univariable analysis was performed by Chi-square test and Student T-test as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was finally used to identify the contributing factors to bacterial culture proven cases. The results were shown as adjusted odds ratio (AdjOR) and 95%CI. Validity domains, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios at each cut-off point for IHA were demonstrated. The results revealed that after adjustment for abdominal pain symptoms, diabetes mellitus (DM)(p-value < 0.001) and dyspnea symptoms (p-value = 0.025) were the associated factors of bacterial culture proven cases. The IHA titer > 1: 10240 provided the highest positive and negative predictive values, 30% and 69% respectively. Both positive and negative likelihood ratios of this cut-off point were also accounted for as 0.95 and 1.003, respectively. Health personnel should perform melioidosis diagnosis by the use of clinical information and an appropriate cut-off point for IHA, especially in diabetic patients who have dyspnea.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health and Development
Journal of Public Health and Development Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting preventive behaviors for unplanned pregnancy in female high school students Counseling intervention on iron-folic acid adherence and clinical outcomes among pregnant women and women planning to be pregnant: a scoping review Antibiotics Use, Resistance and Self-medication Practices among Healthcare Workers in a Federal Teaching Hospital in Southwest, Nigeria Predictive factors for resilience quotient among village health volunteers in Northern Thailand post-COVID-19 Applying the concept of Thai nutrient profiling as a model for the Thai school lunch planner
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1