欧足联财政公平竞争的有效性:来自英格兰和法国的证据,2008-2018

IF 1.9 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Sport Business and Management-An International Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-18 DOI:10.1108/sbm-03-2021-0024
A. François, Nadine Dermit-Richard, D. Plumley, Robert Wilson, N. Heutte
{"title":"欧足联财政公平竞争的有效性:来自英格兰和法国的证据,2008-2018","authors":"A. François, Nadine Dermit-Richard, D. Plumley, Robert Wilson, N. Heutte","doi":"10.1108/sbm-03-2021-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper analyses the effectiveness of UEFA's Financial Fair Play (FFP) under the break-even requirement.Design/methodology/approachData was collected from English and French football clubs competing in the English Premier League (EPL) and in Ligue 1 (L1) for the financial years 2008–2018. Our sample includes 395 club-year observations. Relevant statistical tests have been conducted with the aim of analysing the effects of pre (2008–2012) and post (2012–2018) FFP enforcement under both profitability and cost-efficiency assumptions.FindingsIn the EPL, an increase is observed in clubs' profitability through both operating and break-even results. In L1, this improvement is only significant for break-even results of clubs not participating regularly in European competitions (non Euro-oriented clubs). Player expenditures, measured through two wage-to-revenue ratios excluding trading activity for one and including it for the other, have significantly decreased in the EPL except for the Euro-oriented clubs for this latter. Conversely, in L1, this decrease is only significant in both wage-to-revenue ratios for non Euro-oriented clubs and for the whole sample when trading is included.Practical implicationsIn addition to evidencing contrasting results in FFP effectiveness across countries, our results suggest it is not the sole cause of such an improvement in clubs' finances. We suggest that UEFA should pursue its efforts to scrutinise the level of clubs' player expenditures and that there is a need for a wider look at the FFP regulations.Originality/valueThis article provides further contribution to empirical studies on FFP effectiveness that have often been focused on a single country.","PeriodicalId":45818,"journal":{"name":"Sport Business and Management-An International Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of UEFA Financial Fair Play: evidence from England and France, 2008–2018\",\"authors\":\"A. François, Nadine Dermit-Richard, D. Plumley, Robert Wilson, N. Heutte\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sbm-03-2021-0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper analyses the effectiveness of UEFA's Financial Fair Play (FFP) under the break-even requirement.Design/methodology/approachData was collected from English and French football clubs competing in the English Premier League (EPL) and in Ligue 1 (L1) for the financial years 2008–2018. Our sample includes 395 club-year observations. Relevant statistical tests have been conducted with the aim of analysing the effects of pre (2008–2012) and post (2012–2018) FFP enforcement under both profitability and cost-efficiency assumptions.FindingsIn the EPL, an increase is observed in clubs' profitability through both operating and break-even results. In L1, this improvement is only significant for break-even results of clubs not participating regularly in European competitions (non Euro-oriented clubs). Player expenditures, measured through two wage-to-revenue ratios excluding trading activity for one and including it for the other, have significantly decreased in the EPL except for the Euro-oriented clubs for this latter. Conversely, in L1, this decrease is only significant in both wage-to-revenue ratios for non Euro-oriented clubs and for the whole sample when trading is included.Practical implicationsIn addition to evidencing contrasting results in FFP effectiveness across countries, our results suggest it is not the sole cause of such an improvement in clubs' finances. We suggest that UEFA should pursue its efforts to scrutinise the level of clubs' player expenditures and that there is a need for a wider look at the FFP regulations.Originality/valueThis article provides further contribution to empirical studies on FFP effectiveness that have often been focused on a single country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sport Business and Management-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sport Business and Management-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbm-03-2021-0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Business and Management-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbm-03-2021-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的分析在收支平衡条件下欧足联财政公平竞争(FFP)的有效性。设计/方法/方法数据收集自2008-2018财政年度参加英超(EPL)和法甲(L1)比赛的英国和法国足球俱乐部。我们的样本包括395个俱乐部年的观察结果。在盈利能力和成本效率假设下,进行了相关的统计测试,目的是分析FFP执行前(2008-2012年)和后(2012-2018年)的效果。在英超联赛中,俱乐部的盈利能力通过运营和盈亏平衡结果都有所提高。在L1中,这种改善只对不定期参加欧洲比赛的俱乐部(非欧洲俱乐部)的盈亏平衡结果有意义。球员的支出,通过两种工资收入比来衡量,其中一种不包括交易活动,另一种包括交易活动,在英超联赛中,除了以欧洲为导向的俱乐部,球员的支出显著下降。相反,在L1中,这种下降只在非欧洲俱乐部的工资收入比和包括交易在内的整个样本中都是显著的。除了证明不同国家之间FFP有效性的对比结果外,我们的研究结果表明,这并不是俱乐部财务状况改善的唯一原因。我们建议欧足联应该继续努力审查俱乐部球员的支出水平,并且有必要对FFP规定进行更广泛的审视。原创性/价值本文为经常集中在单个国家的FFP有效性实证研究提供了进一步的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effectiveness of UEFA Financial Fair Play: evidence from England and France, 2008–2018
PurposeThis paper analyses the effectiveness of UEFA's Financial Fair Play (FFP) under the break-even requirement.Design/methodology/approachData was collected from English and French football clubs competing in the English Premier League (EPL) and in Ligue 1 (L1) for the financial years 2008–2018. Our sample includes 395 club-year observations. Relevant statistical tests have been conducted with the aim of analysing the effects of pre (2008–2012) and post (2012–2018) FFP enforcement under both profitability and cost-efficiency assumptions.FindingsIn the EPL, an increase is observed in clubs' profitability through both operating and break-even results. In L1, this improvement is only significant for break-even results of clubs not participating regularly in European competitions (non Euro-oriented clubs). Player expenditures, measured through two wage-to-revenue ratios excluding trading activity for one and including it for the other, have significantly decreased in the EPL except for the Euro-oriented clubs for this latter. Conversely, in L1, this decrease is only significant in both wage-to-revenue ratios for non Euro-oriented clubs and for the whole sample when trading is included.Practical implicationsIn addition to evidencing contrasting results in FFP effectiveness across countries, our results suggest it is not the sole cause of such an improvement in clubs' finances. We suggest that UEFA should pursue its efforts to scrutinise the level of clubs' player expenditures and that there is a need for a wider look at the FFP regulations.Originality/valueThis article provides further contribution to empirical studies on FFP effectiveness that have often been focused on a single country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sport Business and Management-An International Journal
Sport Business and Management-An International Journal HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Sponsorship, Covid-19 and mega sport events: the case of UEFA Euro 2020 General manager and head coach exits in the NBA and the NFL Legend of leagues: heterogeneity in the revenue structure of European national leagues Fan identification in football: professional football players and clubs competing for fan loyalty Esports, video gaming and their fuzziness: a conceptualization and categorization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1