奥比胆酸对熊去氧胆酸无效的原发性胆管炎患者治疗早期改善转氨酶的临床研究

S. Labanca, V. Cacciato, P. Borro, S. Marenco, G. Pieri, A. Picciotto, M. C. Plaz Torres, E. Giannini
{"title":"奥比胆酸对熊去氧胆酸无效的原发性胆管炎患者治疗早期改善转氨酶的临床研究","authors":"S. Labanca, V. Cacciato, P. Borro, S. Marenco, G. Pieri, A. Picciotto, M. C. Plaz Torres, E. Giannini","doi":"10.3390/immuno1040033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obeticholic acid (OCA) improves cholestasis and is generally well tolerated in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) not responding, or intolerant, to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). As PBC is mainly a cholestatic disorder, less attention is paid to aminotransferase behavior in the course of treatment. In this study we evaluated, in clinical practice, the efficacy of OCA treatment on both alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) using updated healthy ranges for aminotransferases. Fifteen PBC patients, non-responders to UDCA, were evaluated at baseline and during OCA treatment with serial measurement of cholestasis indexes and ALT, that were also assessed using updated normal ranges (<30 IU/L in males, <19 IU/L in females). Median ALP and ALT decreased from 2.16 to 1.27 × upper limit of normal (p = 0.003) and from 0.93 to 0.78 × upper limit of normal (p = 0.008), respectively, in the course of OCA treatment. At treatment day-15, median ALT decreased by 29.7% and ALP by 8.8%. Bilirubin and albumin were unmodified throughout treatment. Using updated normal ranges, ALT levels were normal in 6.7% of patients at baseline and in 33.3% of patients at 18 months of treatment. OCA treatment improves cholestasis and, also, indexes of hepatocyte necrosis, with a decline in necro-inflammatory activity even predating the improvement in cholestasis. Use of recalibrated healthy ranges for aminotransferases might be a useful tool to assess hepatic histological activity and its improvement with OCA treatment.","PeriodicalId":55599,"journal":{"name":"Immuno-Analyse & Biologie Specialisee","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obeticholic Acid Improves Aminotransferases Early during Treatment in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis Not Responding to Ursodeoxycholic Acid: A Study in Clinical Practice\",\"authors\":\"S. Labanca, V. Cacciato, P. Borro, S. Marenco, G. Pieri, A. Picciotto, M. C. Plaz Torres, E. Giannini\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/immuno1040033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Obeticholic acid (OCA) improves cholestasis and is generally well tolerated in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) not responding, or intolerant, to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). As PBC is mainly a cholestatic disorder, less attention is paid to aminotransferase behavior in the course of treatment. In this study we evaluated, in clinical practice, the efficacy of OCA treatment on both alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) using updated healthy ranges for aminotransferases. Fifteen PBC patients, non-responders to UDCA, were evaluated at baseline and during OCA treatment with serial measurement of cholestasis indexes and ALT, that were also assessed using updated normal ranges (<30 IU/L in males, <19 IU/L in females). Median ALP and ALT decreased from 2.16 to 1.27 × upper limit of normal (p = 0.003) and from 0.93 to 0.78 × upper limit of normal (p = 0.008), respectively, in the course of OCA treatment. At treatment day-15, median ALT decreased by 29.7% and ALP by 8.8%. Bilirubin and albumin were unmodified throughout treatment. Using updated normal ranges, ALT levels were normal in 6.7% of patients at baseline and in 33.3% of patients at 18 months of treatment. OCA treatment improves cholestasis and, also, indexes of hepatocyte necrosis, with a decline in necro-inflammatory activity even predating the improvement in cholestasis. Use of recalibrated healthy ranges for aminotransferases might be a useful tool to assess hepatic histological activity and its improvement with OCA treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immuno-Analyse & Biologie Specialisee\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immuno-Analyse & Biologie Specialisee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno1040033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immuno-Analyse & Biologie Specialisee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno1040033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奥贝胆酸(OCA)改善胆汁淤积,对于对熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)无反应或不耐受的原发性胆道炎(PBC)患者通常耐受性良好。由于PBC主要是一种胆汁淤积性疾病,在治疗过程中对转氨酶行为的关注较少。在这项研究中,我们在临床实践中评估了OCA治疗对碱性磷酸酶(ALP)和丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)的疗效,使用最新的转氨酶健康范围。15例对UDCA无反应的PBC患者在基线和OCA治疗期间通过一系列测量胆汁淤滞指数和ALT进行评估,并使用更新的正常范围(男性<30 IU/L,女性<19 IU/L)进行评估。在OCA治疗过程中,ALP和ALT的中位值分别从2.16 ×正常上限(p = 0.003)和0.93 ×正常上限(p = 0.008)下降到1.27 ×正常上限(p = 0.003)。治疗第15天,ALT中位数下降29.7%,ALP中位数下降8.8%。胆红素和白蛋白在整个治疗过程中未发生改变。使用最新的正常范围,6.7%的患者在基线时ALT水平正常,治疗18个月时33.3%的患者ALT水平正常。OCA治疗改善了胆汁淤积,也改善了肝细胞坏死指数,坏死炎症活性的下降甚至早于胆汁淤积的改善。使用重新校准的转氨酶健康范围可能是评估肝脏组织活性及其在OCA治疗中的改善的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Obeticholic Acid Improves Aminotransferases Early during Treatment in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis Not Responding to Ursodeoxycholic Acid: A Study in Clinical Practice
Obeticholic acid (OCA) improves cholestasis and is generally well tolerated in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) not responding, or intolerant, to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). As PBC is mainly a cholestatic disorder, less attention is paid to aminotransferase behavior in the course of treatment. In this study we evaluated, in clinical practice, the efficacy of OCA treatment on both alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) using updated healthy ranges for aminotransferases. Fifteen PBC patients, non-responders to UDCA, were evaluated at baseline and during OCA treatment with serial measurement of cholestasis indexes and ALT, that were also assessed using updated normal ranges (<30 IU/L in males, <19 IU/L in females). Median ALP and ALT decreased from 2.16 to 1.27 × upper limit of normal (p = 0.003) and from 0.93 to 0.78 × upper limit of normal (p = 0.008), respectively, in the course of OCA treatment. At treatment day-15, median ALT decreased by 29.7% and ALP by 8.8%. Bilirubin and albumin were unmodified throughout treatment. Using updated normal ranges, ALT levels were normal in 6.7% of patients at baseline and in 33.3% of patients at 18 months of treatment. OCA treatment improves cholestasis and, also, indexes of hepatocyte necrosis, with a decline in necro-inflammatory activity even predating the improvement in cholestasis. Use of recalibrated healthy ranges for aminotransferases might be a useful tool to assess hepatic histological activity and its improvement with OCA treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immuno-Analyse & Biologie Specialisee
Immuno-Analyse & Biologie Specialisee 医学-医学实验技术
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Increased COVID-19 Mortality and Deficient SARS-CoV-2 Immune Response Are Not Associated with Higher Levels of Endemic Coronavirus Antibodies Bone Marrow: The Central Immune System The Importance of Neutrophils in Osteoarthritis: Current Concepts and Therapeutic Perspectives Immunotherapeutic Development of a Tri-Specific NK Cell Engager Recognizing BCMA Inflammatory Profile of Th9 Cells and Their Protective Potential in Helminth Infections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1