{"title":"生物柴油生产废水的催化处理研究","authors":"T. Borralho, Solange Coelho, Andreia Estrelo","doi":"10.24425/aep.2019.127981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of the possibility of removing organic compounds from wastewater originating from the biodiesel purifi cation stage by two catalytic processes, HSO5 -/transition metal and Fenton method has been presented. The source of the ion HSO5 is potassium monopersulphate (2KHSO5∙KHSO4∙K2SO4) (Oxone) that may be decomposed into radicals (OH., SO4 -., SO5 -.) by means of transition metal as Co (II). Different concentrations were used for both compounds and the combination ([Co2+] =1.00μM/[HSO5 -] =5.00×10-2 M) achieved the highest COD removal (60%) and complete decomposition of the oxidant was verifi ed for contact times of 45 min. This process has some advantages comparing to the conventional Fenton method such as the absence of the costly pH adjustment and the Fe(III) hydroxide sludge which characterize this treatment process. The Fenton process showed that the combination of [H2O2] =2.00M/[Fe 2+] = 0.70 M was the best and archived COD removal of 80%. The treatments studied in this research have achieved high COD removal, but the wastewater from the biodiesel purifi cation stage presents very high parametric values of Chemical Oxygen Demand (667,000 mgO2/L), so the fi nal COD concentration reached is still above the emission limit of discharge in surface water, according the Portuguese Law (Decree-Law 236/98). However, both treatments have proved to be feasible techniques for the pre-oxidation of the wastewater under study and can be considered as a suitable pre-treatment for this type of wastewaters. A rough economic analysis of both processes was, also, made. Archives vol 45 no 2 a4 srodki.indd 66 2019-05-09 14:53:01 Study of catalytic processes for biodiesel production wastewater treatment 67 2012, Chi et al. 2016, Wang and Chu 2012) thereby providing mechanisms for reaction with some advantages comparing to hydroxyl radicals (Hu and Long 2016, Oh et al. 2016). Oxone can also be decomposed into radicals by means of transition metals, such as Co (II), Ru (II) and Mn (II) (Rivas et al. 2012), according Eqs.1, 2 and 3: HSO5 + M n+ → SO4 .+M(n+1) + + OH(Eq. 1) HSO5 + M n+ → SO4 +M(n+1) + + OH. (Eq. 2) HSO5 + M n+ → SO5 +M(n+1) + + H+ (Eq. 3) M = Co (II), Ru (II) or Mn (II) Co (II) has been reported as one of the most effective metal catalysts for the activation of HSO5 promoting a radical sulphate complex mechanism (Rivas et al. 2012, Sun et al. 2009). So, the main objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of two catalytic treatments based in advanced oxidation processes; the traditional Fenton process and the emerging treatment that uses the compound monopersulphate (HSO5 -) on the removal of wastewater COD from the biodiesel purifi cation stage. Several combinations of the amounts of oxidant/catalyst have been investigated and optimum conditions assessed. Materials and methods Materials and chemical reagents Table 1 summarises the physicochemical characteristics of the biodiesel wastewater used, provided by PRIO (Prio Energy Co). The reagents used in this work were: Sulfuric acid, H2SO4, 95–98%, (Panreac); Ultrapure water, Mili-Q. Resistivity 10 MΩ cm; Sodium hydroxide, NaOH, 98%, (Panreac); Potassium iodate, KIO3, (Panreac); Potassium iodide, KI, 99.0–100.5%, (Panreac); Ammonium molybdate, (NH4)2MoO4∙4H2O, 93.1–101.0% (Panreac); Oxone, 2KHSO5∙KHSO4∙K2SO4, 99.9%, (Sigma Aldrich); Cobalt(II) sulphate, CoSO4∙7H2O, (Sigma Aldrich); Sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, 98–102%, (Panreac); Hydrochloric acid, HCl, 36% (Panreac); Barium chloride, BaCl2∙H2O (Panreac); Hydrogen peroxide, H2O2, 30% w/w, (Scharlab); Iron(II) sulphate, FeSO4∙7H2O, (Sigma Aldrich); Potassium dichromate, K2Cr2O7 , (Panreac) and Silver nitrate, AgNO3, (Panreac). All reagents used were analytical grade. Analytical method Different physico-chemical parameters such as pH, Conductivity, Redox potential, Turbidity, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Oil and grease and Chlorides were analysed for the sample characterization. The characterization was performed according to Standardized Water and Wastewater Methods (APHA 2012). The pH and Redox Potential were determined by the potentiometer pH – Metron 654 pH meter and WTW – Inolab potentiometer respectively, while Conductivity was measured by the conductivity meter Methohm, and the Turbidity using a WTW Turb.550 turbidimeter. In the determination of sulphates the furnace, Thermo – Heraeus, model K 114 was used. For both catalytic treatments (HSO5 -/Co2+ and Fenton process) several concentrations of Oxone and hydrogen peroxide were tested and its evolution over time of reaction was monitored using the iodometric method. This method consists in adding to the sample an excess of iodide which is titrated with sodium thiosulphate solution. Thus, 5 mL of sample was taken, 10 mL of H2SO4, 2.0 N, 25 mL of KI (20 g/L) and a few drops of saturated ammonium molybdate solution were added, which acted as a catalyst. The reaction that occurs is: HSO5 + 2I+ 2H+ → I2 + H2O + HSO4 (Eq. 4) H2O2 + 2I + 2H+ → I2 + H2O + OH (Eq. 5) Then it is titrated with sodium thiosulfate, previously measured with KIO3 and the desired concentration is obtained by: C = (VS2O3 2∙ CS2O3 2-)/2 ∙ Vsample (Eq. 6) where VS2O3 2is the volume of thiosulphate spent in the titration, CS2O3 2is the concentration of the thiosulphate solution used and V sample is the volume of the sample. At the end of treatments organic matter degradation was carried out by COD determination (APHA 2012). The sulphates were determined using the gravimetric method (APHA 2012) and the chlorides with the Mohr method (APHA 2012). Methodology of research Both experiments were carried out in a discontinuous way using 300 mL of wastewater with stirring at a constant speed of 250 rpm to avoid concentration gradients. The assays started Table 1. Biodiesel wastewater physicochemical characteristics and the respective Limit Emission Values (LEV) of wastewater discharges in surface water according Decree-Law 236/98 (Portuguese legislation) Parameter Biodiesel wastewater Decree-Law 236/98 (LEV)","PeriodicalId":48950,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Environmental Protection","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of catalytic processes for biodiesel production wastewater treatment\",\"authors\":\"T. Borralho, Solange Coelho, Andreia Estrelo\",\"doi\":\"10.24425/aep.2019.127981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study of the possibility of removing organic compounds from wastewater originating from the biodiesel purifi cation stage by two catalytic processes, HSO5 -/transition metal and Fenton method has been presented. The source of the ion HSO5 is potassium monopersulphate (2KHSO5∙KHSO4∙K2SO4) (Oxone) that may be decomposed into radicals (OH., SO4 -., SO5 -.) by means of transition metal as Co (II). Different concentrations were used for both compounds and the combination ([Co2+] =1.00μM/[HSO5 -] =5.00×10-2 M) achieved the highest COD removal (60%) and complete decomposition of the oxidant was verifi ed for contact times of 45 min. This process has some advantages comparing to the conventional Fenton method such as the absence of the costly pH adjustment and the Fe(III) hydroxide sludge which characterize this treatment process. The Fenton process showed that the combination of [H2O2] =2.00M/[Fe 2+] = 0.70 M was the best and archived COD removal of 80%. The treatments studied in this research have achieved high COD removal, but the wastewater from the biodiesel purifi cation stage presents very high parametric values of Chemical Oxygen Demand (667,000 mgO2/L), so the fi nal COD concentration reached is still above the emission limit of discharge in surface water, according the Portuguese Law (Decree-Law 236/98). However, both treatments have proved to be feasible techniques for the pre-oxidation of the wastewater under study and can be considered as a suitable pre-treatment for this type of wastewaters. A rough economic analysis of both processes was, also, made. Archives vol 45 no 2 a4 srodki.indd 66 2019-05-09 14:53:01 Study of catalytic processes for biodiesel production wastewater treatment 67 2012, Chi et al. 2016, Wang and Chu 2012) thereby providing mechanisms for reaction with some advantages comparing to hydroxyl radicals (Hu and Long 2016, Oh et al. 2016). Oxone can also be decomposed into radicals by means of transition metals, such as Co (II), Ru (II) and Mn (II) (Rivas et al. 2012), according Eqs.1, 2 and 3: HSO5 + M n+ → SO4 .+M(n+1) + + OH(Eq. 1) HSO5 + M n+ → SO4 +M(n+1) + + OH. (Eq. 2) HSO5 + M n+ → SO5 +M(n+1) + + H+ (Eq. 3) M = Co (II), Ru (II) or Mn (II) Co (II) has been reported as one of the most effective metal catalysts for the activation of HSO5 promoting a radical sulphate complex mechanism (Rivas et al. 2012, Sun et al. 2009). So, the main objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of two catalytic treatments based in advanced oxidation processes; the traditional Fenton process and the emerging treatment that uses the compound monopersulphate (HSO5 -) on the removal of wastewater COD from the biodiesel purifi cation stage. Several combinations of the amounts of oxidant/catalyst have been investigated and optimum conditions assessed. Materials and methods Materials and chemical reagents Table 1 summarises the physicochemical characteristics of the biodiesel wastewater used, provided by PRIO (Prio Energy Co). The reagents used in this work were: Sulfuric acid, H2SO4, 95–98%, (Panreac); Ultrapure water, Mili-Q. Resistivity 10 MΩ cm; Sodium hydroxide, NaOH, 98%, (Panreac); Potassium iodate, KIO3, (Panreac); Potassium iodide, KI, 99.0–100.5%, (Panreac); Ammonium molybdate, (NH4)2MoO4∙4H2O, 93.1–101.0% (Panreac); Oxone, 2KHSO5∙KHSO4∙K2SO4, 99.9%, (Sigma Aldrich); Cobalt(II) sulphate, CoSO4∙7H2O, (Sigma Aldrich); Sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, 98–102%, (Panreac); Hydrochloric acid, HCl, 36% (Panreac); Barium chloride, BaCl2∙H2O (Panreac); Hydrogen peroxide, H2O2, 30% w/w, (Scharlab); Iron(II) sulphate, FeSO4∙7H2O, (Sigma Aldrich); Potassium dichromate, K2Cr2O7 , (Panreac) and Silver nitrate, AgNO3, (Panreac). All reagents used were analytical grade. Analytical method Different physico-chemical parameters such as pH, Conductivity, Redox potential, Turbidity, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Oil and grease and Chlorides were analysed for the sample characterization. The characterization was performed according to Standardized Water and Wastewater Methods (APHA 2012). The pH and Redox Potential were determined by the potentiometer pH – Metron 654 pH meter and WTW – Inolab potentiometer respectively, while Conductivity was measured by the conductivity meter Methohm, and the Turbidity using a WTW Turb.550 turbidimeter. In the determination of sulphates the furnace, Thermo – Heraeus, model K 114 was used. For both catalytic treatments (HSO5 -/Co2+ and Fenton process) several concentrations of Oxone and hydrogen peroxide were tested and its evolution over time of reaction was monitored using the iodometric method. This method consists in adding to the sample an excess of iodide which is titrated with sodium thiosulphate solution. Thus, 5 mL of sample was taken, 10 mL of H2SO4, 2.0 N, 25 mL of KI (20 g/L) and a few drops of saturated ammonium molybdate solution were added, which acted as a catalyst. The reaction that occurs is: HSO5 + 2I+ 2H+ → I2 + H2O + HSO4 (Eq. 4) H2O2 + 2I + 2H+ → I2 + H2O + OH (Eq. 5) Then it is titrated with sodium thiosulfate, previously measured with KIO3 and the desired concentration is obtained by: C = (VS2O3 2∙ CS2O3 2-)/2 ∙ Vsample (Eq. 6) where VS2O3 2is the volume of thiosulphate spent in the titration, CS2O3 2is the concentration of the thiosulphate solution used and V sample is the volume of the sample. At the end of treatments organic matter degradation was carried out by COD determination (APHA 2012). The sulphates were determined using the gravimetric method (APHA 2012) and the chlorides with the Mohr method (APHA 2012). Methodology of research Both experiments were carried out in a discontinuous way using 300 mL of wastewater with stirring at a constant speed of 250 rpm to avoid concentration gradients. The assays started Table 1. Biodiesel wastewater physicochemical characteristics and the respective Limit Emission Values (LEV) of wastewater discharges in surface water according Decree-Law 236/98 (Portuguese legislation) Parameter Biodiesel wastewater Decree-Law 236/98 (LEV)\",\"PeriodicalId\":48950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24425/aep.2019.127981\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/aep.2019.127981","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究了HSO5 -/过渡金属法和Fenton法两种催化工艺去除生物柴油净化废水中有机物的可能性。离子HSO5的来源是一过硫酸钾(2KHSO5∙KHSO4∙K2SO4) (Oxone),可能被分解成自由基(OH)。, so4 -。两种化合物使用不同的浓度([Co2+] =1.00μM/[HSO5 -] =5.00×10-2 M),达到了最高的COD去除率(60%),并且在接触时间为45分钟的情况下证实了氧化剂的完全分解。与传统的Fenton法相比,该工艺具有一些优点,例如没有昂贵的pH调整和Fe(III)氢氧化物污泥,这是该处理过程的特征。Fenton工艺结果表明,[H2O2] =2.00M/[fe2 +] = 0.70 M的组合效果最佳,COD去除率达80%。本研究所研究的处理方法均取得了较高的COD去除率,但生物柴油净化阶段废水的化学需氧量参数值非常高(667,000 mgO2/L),因此最终达到的COD浓度仍高于葡萄牙法律(法令236/98)规定的地表水排放限值。然而,这两种处理方法已被证明是对所研究的废水进行预氧化的可行技术,可以被认为是这类废水的合适预处理方法。对这两种过程也作了粗略的经济分析。档案卷45第2卷a4。生物柴油生产废水的催化工艺研究67 2012,Chi et al. 2016, Wang and Chu 2012),从而提供了与羟基自由基相比具有一定优势的反应机制(Hu and Long 2016, Oh et al. 2016)。氧酮也可以通过过渡金属,如Co (II)、Ru (II)和Mn (II)分解为自由基(Rivas etal . 2012),根据公式1、2和3:HSO5 +M n+→SO4 .+M(n+1) + + OH(Eq。1) HSO5 +M n+→SO4 +M(n+1) + + OH。(Eq. 2) HSO5 +M n+→SO5 +M(n+1) + + H+ (Eq. 3) M = Co (II), Ru (II)或Mn (II) Co (II)被报道为激活HSO5最有效的金属催化剂之一,促进了自由基硫酸盐络合机制(Rivas etal . 2012, Sun etal . 2009)。因此,本研究的主要目的是评估两种基于高级氧化工艺的催化处理的性能;传统的Fenton工艺和新兴的复合过硫酸盐(HSO5 -)处理生物柴油净化阶段的废水COD。研究了几种氧化剂/催化剂用量的组合,并评估了最佳条件。材料和方法材料和化学试剂表1总结了使用的生物柴油废水的物理化学特性,由PRIO (PRIO Energy Co .)提供。本工作所用试剂为:硫酸,H2SO4, 95-98%, (Panreac);超纯水,Mili-Q。电阻率10 MΩ cm;氢氧化钠,NaOH, 98% (Panreac);碘酸钾KIO3 (Panreac);碘化钾,KI, 99.0-100.5% (Panreac);钼酸铵,(NH4)2MoO4∙4H2O, 93.1-101.0% (Panreac);Oxone, 2KHSO5∙KHSO4∙K2SO4, 99.9%, (Sigma Aldrich);硫酸钴,CoSO4∙7H2O, (Sigma Aldrich);硫代硫酸钠Na2S2O3, 98-102%, (Panreac);盐酸HCl, 36% (Panreac);氯化钡,BaCl2∙H2O (Panreac);过氧化氢,H2O2, 30% w/w, (Scharlab);硫酸铁,FeSO4∙7H2O, (Sigma Aldrich);重铬酸钾K2Cr2O7 (Panreac)和硝酸银AgNO3 (Panreac)。所用试剂均为分析级试剂。分析方法采用pH、电导率、氧化还原电位、浊度、化学需氧量(COD)、油脂和氯化物等理化参数对样品进行表征。根据标准化水和废水方法(APHA 2012)进行表征。pH和氧化还原电位分别用pH - Metron 654电位器和WTW - Inolab电位器测定,电导率用电导率仪法测定,浊度用WTW Turb.550浊度仪测定。硫酸盐的测定采用Thermo - Heraeus k114型炉。在两种催化处理(HSO5 -/Co2+和Fenton法)中,测试了氧酮和过氧化氢的浓度,并使用碘量法监测了其随反应时间的变化。这种方法是在样品中加入过量的碘化物,用硫代硫酸钠溶液滴定。因此,取5 mL样品,加入10 mL H2SO4, 2.0 N, 25 mL KI (20 g/L)和几滴饱和钼酸铵溶液作为催化剂。所发生的反应为:HSO5 + 2I+ 2H+→I2 + H2O + HSO4(式。 4) H2O2 + 2I + 2H+→I2 + H2O + OH (Eq. 5)然后用硫代硫酸钠滴定,之前用KIO3测量,所需浓度为:C = (VS2O3 2∙CS2O3 2-)/2∙Vsample (Eq. 6),其中VS2O3 2为滴定中消耗的硫代硫酸盐体积,CS2O3 2为所用硫代硫酸盐溶液的浓度,Vsample为样品体积。处理结束时,通过COD测定进行有机物降解(APHA 2012)。硫酸盐用重量法测定(APHA 2012),氯化物用莫尔法测定(APHA 2012)。两项实验均采用不连续方式进行,取300 mL废水,以250 rpm的恒定转速搅拌,以避免浓度梯度。实验开始于表1。根据第236/98号法令(葡萄牙立法),生物柴油废水的物理化学特性和地表水中废水排放的各自排放限值(LEV)
Study of catalytic processes for biodiesel production wastewater treatment
The study of the possibility of removing organic compounds from wastewater originating from the biodiesel purifi cation stage by two catalytic processes, HSO5 -/transition metal and Fenton method has been presented. The source of the ion HSO5 is potassium monopersulphate (2KHSO5∙KHSO4∙K2SO4) (Oxone) that may be decomposed into radicals (OH., SO4 -., SO5 -.) by means of transition metal as Co (II). Different concentrations were used for both compounds and the combination ([Co2+] =1.00μM/[HSO5 -] =5.00×10-2 M) achieved the highest COD removal (60%) and complete decomposition of the oxidant was verifi ed for contact times of 45 min. This process has some advantages comparing to the conventional Fenton method such as the absence of the costly pH adjustment and the Fe(III) hydroxide sludge which characterize this treatment process. The Fenton process showed that the combination of [H2O2] =2.00M/[Fe 2+] = 0.70 M was the best and archived COD removal of 80%. The treatments studied in this research have achieved high COD removal, but the wastewater from the biodiesel purifi cation stage presents very high parametric values of Chemical Oxygen Demand (667,000 mgO2/L), so the fi nal COD concentration reached is still above the emission limit of discharge in surface water, according the Portuguese Law (Decree-Law 236/98). However, both treatments have proved to be feasible techniques for the pre-oxidation of the wastewater under study and can be considered as a suitable pre-treatment for this type of wastewaters. A rough economic analysis of both processes was, also, made. Archives vol 45 no 2 a4 srodki.indd 66 2019-05-09 14:53:01 Study of catalytic processes for biodiesel production wastewater treatment 67 2012, Chi et al. 2016, Wang and Chu 2012) thereby providing mechanisms for reaction with some advantages comparing to hydroxyl radicals (Hu and Long 2016, Oh et al. 2016). Oxone can also be decomposed into radicals by means of transition metals, such as Co (II), Ru (II) and Mn (II) (Rivas et al. 2012), according Eqs.1, 2 and 3: HSO5 + M n+ → SO4 .+M(n+1) + + OH(Eq. 1) HSO5 + M n+ → SO4 +M(n+1) + + OH. (Eq. 2) HSO5 + M n+ → SO5 +M(n+1) + + H+ (Eq. 3) M = Co (II), Ru (II) or Mn (II) Co (II) has been reported as one of the most effective metal catalysts for the activation of HSO5 promoting a radical sulphate complex mechanism (Rivas et al. 2012, Sun et al. 2009). So, the main objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of two catalytic treatments based in advanced oxidation processes; the traditional Fenton process and the emerging treatment that uses the compound monopersulphate (HSO5 -) on the removal of wastewater COD from the biodiesel purifi cation stage. Several combinations of the amounts of oxidant/catalyst have been investigated and optimum conditions assessed. Materials and methods Materials and chemical reagents Table 1 summarises the physicochemical characteristics of the biodiesel wastewater used, provided by PRIO (Prio Energy Co). The reagents used in this work were: Sulfuric acid, H2SO4, 95–98%, (Panreac); Ultrapure water, Mili-Q. Resistivity 10 MΩ cm; Sodium hydroxide, NaOH, 98%, (Panreac); Potassium iodate, KIO3, (Panreac); Potassium iodide, KI, 99.0–100.5%, (Panreac); Ammonium molybdate, (NH4)2MoO4∙4H2O, 93.1–101.0% (Panreac); Oxone, 2KHSO5∙KHSO4∙K2SO4, 99.9%, (Sigma Aldrich); Cobalt(II) sulphate, CoSO4∙7H2O, (Sigma Aldrich); Sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, 98–102%, (Panreac); Hydrochloric acid, HCl, 36% (Panreac); Barium chloride, BaCl2∙H2O (Panreac); Hydrogen peroxide, H2O2, 30% w/w, (Scharlab); Iron(II) sulphate, FeSO4∙7H2O, (Sigma Aldrich); Potassium dichromate, K2Cr2O7 , (Panreac) and Silver nitrate, AgNO3, (Panreac). All reagents used were analytical grade. Analytical method Different physico-chemical parameters such as pH, Conductivity, Redox potential, Turbidity, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Oil and grease and Chlorides were analysed for the sample characterization. The characterization was performed according to Standardized Water and Wastewater Methods (APHA 2012). The pH and Redox Potential were determined by the potentiometer pH – Metron 654 pH meter and WTW – Inolab potentiometer respectively, while Conductivity was measured by the conductivity meter Methohm, and the Turbidity using a WTW Turb.550 turbidimeter. In the determination of sulphates the furnace, Thermo – Heraeus, model K 114 was used. For both catalytic treatments (HSO5 -/Co2+ and Fenton process) several concentrations of Oxone and hydrogen peroxide were tested and its evolution over time of reaction was monitored using the iodometric method. This method consists in adding to the sample an excess of iodide which is titrated with sodium thiosulphate solution. Thus, 5 mL of sample was taken, 10 mL of H2SO4, 2.0 N, 25 mL of KI (20 g/L) and a few drops of saturated ammonium molybdate solution were added, which acted as a catalyst. The reaction that occurs is: HSO5 + 2I+ 2H+ → I2 + H2O + HSO4 (Eq. 4) H2O2 + 2I + 2H+ → I2 + H2O + OH (Eq. 5) Then it is titrated with sodium thiosulfate, previously measured with KIO3 and the desired concentration is obtained by: C = (VS2O3 2∙ CS2O3 2-)/2 ∙ Vsample (Eq. 6) where VS2O3 2is the volume of thiosulphate spent in the titration, CS2O3 2is the concentration of the thiosulphate solution used and V sample is the volume of the sample. At the end of treatments organic matter degradation was carried out by COD determination (APHA 2012). The sulphates were determined using the gravimetric method (APHA 2012) and the chlorides with the Mohr method (APHA 2012). Methodology of research Both experiments were carried out in a discontinuous way using 300 mL of wastewater with stirring at a constant speed of 250 rpm to avoid concentration gradients. The assays started Table 1. Biodiesel wastewater physicochemical characteristics and the respective Limit Emission Values (LEV) of wastewater discharges in surface water according Decree-Law 236/98 (Portuguese legislation) Parameter Biodiesel wastewater Decree-Law 236/98 (LEV)
期刊介绍:
Archives of Environmental Protection is the oldest Polish scientific journal of international scope that publishes articles on engineering and environmental protection. The quarterly has been published by the Institute of Environmental Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences since 1975. The journal has served as a forum for the exchange of views and ideas among scientists. It has become part of scientific life in Poland and abroad. The quarterly publishes the results of research and scientific inquiries by best specialists hereby becoming an important pillar of science. The journal facilitates better understanding of environmental risks to humans and ecosystems and it also shows the methods for their analysis as well as trends in the search of effective solutions to minimize these risks.