寰枢操纵对心血管生理的直接影响

John Ward , Ken Tyer , Jesse Coats , Gabbrielle Williams , Shauna Weigand , Danielle Cockburn
{"title":"寰枢操纵对心血管生理的直接影响","authors":"John Ward ,&nbsp;Ken Tyer ,&nbsp;Jesse Coats ,&nbsp;Gabbrielle Williams ,&nbsp;Shauna Weigand ,&nbsp;Danielle Cockburn","doi":"10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The aims of this study were (1) to determine if there were any statistically significant immediate effects of atlas Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy (CMT) on </span>cardiovascular physiology among normotensive individuals and (2) to quantify those responses if they were found.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A single-blind, randomized controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Human physiology lab.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>Forty-eight college students (age<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->25.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.4 years, height<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.70<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.10<!--> <!-->m, body mass<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->76.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->20.1<!--> <!-->kg: mean<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->SD) were sampled in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>Participants were equally randomized into four study groups: left head-turn control, no contact control, left atlas manipulation, and right atlas manipulation. The CMT provided was a cervical break. Electrocardiogram (ECG), bilateral pulse oximetry, and bilateral </span>blood pressure measurement were performed at baseline, post 1-min intervention, post 10-min intervention, and approximately post 24-h (±1</span> <!-->h) intervention. Between-group dependent variables were analyzed through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at each time point.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No statistically significant difference was shown among any between-group cardiovascular dependent variables in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this research suggest cardiovascular physiology is not affected by CMT of the atlas in normotensive individuals. These findings in relation to existing research suggest future cervical spine CMT studies should be performed focusing on hypertensive patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Chiropractic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.036","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate effects of atlas manipulation on cardiovascular physiology\",\"authors\":\"John Ward ,&nbsp;Ken Tyer ,&nbsp;Jesse Coats ,&nbsp;Gabbrielle Williams ,&nbsp;Shauna Weigand ,&nbsp;Danielle Cockburn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The aims of this study were (1) to determine if there were any statistically significant immediate effects of atlas Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy (CMT) on </span>cardiovascular physiology among normotensive individuals and (2) to quantify those responses if they were found.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A single-blind, randomized controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Human physiology lab.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>Forty-eight college students (age<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->25.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.4 years, height<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.70<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.10<!--> <!-->m, body mass<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->76.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->20.1<!--> <!-->kg: mean<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->SD) were sampled in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>Participants were equally randomized into four study groups: left head-turn control, no contact control, left atlas manipulation, and right atlas manipulation. The CMT provided was a cervical break. Electrocardiogram (ECG), bilateral pulse oximetry, and bilateral </span>blood pressure measurement were performed at baseline, post 1-min intervention, post 10-min intervention, and approximately post 24-h (±1</span> <!-->h) intervention. Between-group dependent variables were analyzed through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at each time point.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No statistically significant difference was shown among any between-group cardiovascular dependent variables in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this research suggest cardiovascular physiology is not affected by CMT of the atlas in normotensive individuals. These findings in relation to existing research suggest future cervical spine CMT studies should be performed focusing on hypertensive patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Chiropractic\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.036\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Chiropractic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479235412001150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Chiropractic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479235412001150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的本研究的目的是:(1)确定寰椎捏脊疗法(CMT)对正常血压个体的心血管生理是否有统计学上显著的直接影响;(2)如果发现这些影响,对这些反应进行量化。设计一项单盲、随机对照试验。人体生理学实验室。对象48名大学生,年龄25.9±3.4岁,身高1.70±0.10 m,体重76.2±20.1 kg,平均±SD。方法将受试者随机分为4个研究组:左转头组、无接触组、左寰椎操纵组和右寰椎操纵组。CMT提供的是颈椎断裂。在基线、干预1分钟后、干预10分钟后和大约干预24小时(±1小时)后进行心电图(ECG)、双侧脉搏血氧仪和双侧血压测量。各时间点组间因变量分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)。结果组间心血管相关变量差异无统计学意义。结论本研究结果提示,在血压正常的个体中,心血管生理不受寰椎CMT的影响。这些与现有研究相关的发现表明,未来的颈椎CMT研究应该集中在高血压患者身上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Immediate effects of atlas manipulation on cardiovascular physiology

Objective

The aims of this study were (1) to determine if there were any statistically significant immediate effects of atlas Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy (CMT) on cardiovascular physiology among normotensive individuals and (2) to quantify those responses if they were found.

Design

A single-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Human physiology lab.

Subjects

Forty-eight college students (age = 25.9 ± 3.4 years, height = 1.70 ± 0.10 m, body mass = 76.2 ± 20.1 kg: mean ± SD) were sampled in this study.

Methods

Participants were equally randomized into four study groups: left head-turn control, no contact control, left atlas manipulation, and right atlas manipulation. The CMT provided was a cervical break. Electrocardiogram (ECG), bilateral pulse oximetry, and bilateral blood pressure measurement were performed at baseline, post 1-min intervention, post 10-min intervention, and approximately post 24-h (±1 h) intervention. Between-group dependent variables were analyzed through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at each time point.

Results

No statistically significant difference was shown among any between-group cardiovascular dependent variables in this study.

Conclusions

The results of this research suggest cardiovascular physiology is not affected by CMT of the atlas in normotensive individuals. These findings in relation to existing research suggest future cervical spine CMT studies should be performed focusing on hypertensive patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chiropractic: Not All That It's Cracked Up to Be Disease Prevention Indirect Risks Ethical Issues Professionalism and Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1