估计不完整家系近亲繁殖的流行程度

T. C. Marshall, David W. Coltman, J. Pemberton, J. Slate, J. A. Spalton, F. Guinness, J. A. Smith, J. Pilkington, T. Clutton‐Brock
{"title":"估计不完整家系近亲繁殖的流行程度","authors":"T. C. Marshall, David W. Coltman, J. Pemberton, J. Slate, J. A. Spalton, F. Guinness, J. A. Smith, J. Pilkington, T. Clutton‐Brock","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2002.2035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A previous review of inbreeding in natural populations suggested that close inbreeding (inbreeding coefficient f = 0.25) is generally rare in wild birds and mammals. However, the review did not assess rates of moderate inbreeding (f = 0.125), which may make a rather larger contribution to overall inbreeding in a population. Furthermore, previous studies may have underestimated the prevalence of inbreeding in wild populations with incomplete pedigrees. By categorizing inbreeding events by the relationship of the parental pair, we suggest a simple method for estimating rates of close and moderate inbreeding from incomplete pedigree data. We applied this method to three wild populations of ruminants: red deer on Rum, Scotland, Soay sheep on Hirta, Scotland and reintroduced Arabian oryx on the Jiddat–al–Harasis, Oman. Although paternal half–sib pairs were the most common category of inbreeding in all three populations, there was considerable variation among populations in the frequencies of the various categories of inbreeding. This variation may be largely explained by differences in population size and dynamics, in maternal and paternal sibship size and in the overlap of reproductive lifespan of consecutive generations. Close and moderate inbreeding appear to be a routine part of breeding behaviour in these ruminant populations.","PeriodicalId":20585,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"92","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the prevalence of inbreeding from incomplete pedigrees\",\"authors\":\"T. C. Marshall, David W. Coltman, J. Pemberton, J. Slate, J. A. Spalton, F. Guinness, J. A. Smith, J. Pilkington, T. Clutton‐Brock\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rspb.2002.2035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A previous review of inbreeding in natural populations suggested that close inbreeding (inbreeding coefficient f = 0.25) is generally rare in wild birds and mammals. However, the review did not assess rates of moderate inbreeding (f = 0.125), which may make a rather larger contribution to overall inbreeding in a population. Furthermore, previous studies may have underestimated the prevalence of inbreeding in wild populations with incomplete pedigrees. By categorizing inbreeding events by the relationship of the parental pair, we suggest a simple method for estimating rates of close and moderate inbreeding from incomplete pedigree data. We applied this method to three wild populations of ruminants: red deer on Rum, Scotland, Soay sheep on Hirta, Scotland and reintroduced Arabian oryx on the Jiddat–al–Harasis, Oman. Although paternal half–sib pairs were the most common category of inbreeding in all three populations, there was considerable variation among populations in the frequencies of the various categories of inbreeding. This variation may be largely explained by differences in population size and dynamics, in maternal and paternal sibship size and in the overlap of reproductive lifespan of consecutive generations. Close and moderate inbreeding appear to be a routine part of breeding behaviour in these ruminant populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"92\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

摘要

以往对自然种群近亲繁殖的研究表明,在野生鸟类和哺乳动物中,近亲繁殖(近亲繁殖系数f = 0.25)通常很少见。然而,这篇综述没有评估适度近交的比率(f = 0.125),而适度近交可能对种群的整体近交有更大的贡献。此外,以前的研究可能低估了近亲繁殖在家谱不完整的野生种群中的流行程度。通过亲本对近亲交配事件的分类,我们提出了一种从不完整的系谱数据中估计近亲交配率和中等近亲交配率的简单方法。我们将这种方法应用于三个野生反刍动物种群:苏格兰朗姆酒的马鹿,苏格兰Hirta的Soay羊和阿曼吉达特哈拉西斯重新引入的阿拉伯大羚羊。虽然在所有三个种群中,父系同父异母的兄弟姐妹是最常见的近亲交配类型,但在不同种群中,各种近亲交配类型的频率存在相当大的差异。这种差异在很大程度上可以用种群规模和动态、母系和父系兄弟姐妹数量的差异以及连续几代的生殖寿命重叠来解释。在这些反刍动物种群中,密切和适度的近亲繁殖似乎是繁殖行为的常规部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating the prevalence of inbreeding from incomplete pedigrees
A previous review of inbreeding in natural populations suggested that close inbreeding (inbreeding coefficient f = 0.25) is generally rare in wild birds and mammals. However, the review did not assess rates of moderate inbreeding (f = 0.125), which may make a rather larger contribution to overall inbreeding in a population. Furthermore, previous studies may have underestimated the prevalence of inbreeding in wild populations with incomplete pedigrees. By categorizing inbreeding events by the relationship of the parental pair, we suggest a simple method for estimating rates of close and moderate inbreeding from incomplete pedigree data. We applied this method to three wild populations of ruminants: red deer on Rum, Scotland, Soay sheep on Hirta, Scotland and reintroduced Arabian oryx on the Jiddat–al–Harasis, Oman. Although paternal half–sib pairs were the most common category of inbreeding in all three populations, there was considerable variation among populations in the frequencies of the various categories of inbreeding. This variation may be largely explained by differences in population size and dynamics, in maternal and paternal sibship size and in the overlap of reproductive lifespan of consecutive generations. Close and moderate inbreeding appear to be a routine part of breeding behaviour in these ruminant populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermal processing. 'Affinity'. Correction for Durant et al., Trophic interactions under climate fluctuations: the Atlantic puffin as an example Correction for Johnstone and Bshary, Evolution of spite through indirect reciprocity Correction for Frönicke et al., Towards the delineation of the ancestral eutherian genome organization: comparative genome maps of human and the African elephant (Loxodonta africana) generated by chromosome painting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1