在公共场合废除维多利亚时代的异性扮装法

Rajiv Jebodh
{"title":"在公共场合废除维多利亚时代的异性扮装法","authors":"Rajiv Jebodh","doi":"10.3167/JLA.2018.020213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review considers how another outdated postcolonial law has\nbeen struck down in a former British colony amidst campaigns, global\nchange and action by an appellate court. This follows from the historic\n2018 Supreme Court ruling from Trinidad and Tobago in the Jason Jones\njudgement, in which it was decided that existing laws prohibiting consensual\nadult intercourse and sexual acts between consenting same-sex\nadults were unconstitutional. This review adds to that decision to\nhighlight further social and sociolegal change in the region which has\ndirect implications for future challenges to postcolonial laws which\nare ‘sitting on the books’. My review looks at recent case law which\nhas overturned Guyana’s Victorian-era cross-dressing prohibition, as\nit relates to 153(1)(xlvii) of the Summary Jurisdiction (Offences) Act\nof Guyana.","PeriodicalId":34676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Striking Down Victorian-Era Cross-Dressing Law in Public Ban\",\"authors\":\"Rajiv Jebodh\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/JLA.2018.020213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review considers how another outdated postcolonial law has\\nbeen struck down in a former British colony amidst campaigns, global\\nchange and action by an appellate court. This follows from the historic\\n2018 Supreme Court ruling from Trinidad and Tobago in the Jason Jones\\njudgement, in which it was decided that existing laws prohibiting consensual\\nadult intercourse and sexual acts between consenting same-sex\\nadults were unconstitutional. This review adds to that decision to\\nhighlight further social and sociolegal change in the region which has\\ndirect implications for future challenges to postcolonial laws which\\nare ‘sitting on the books’. My review looks at recent case law which\\nhas overturned Guyana’s Victorian-era cross-dressing prohibition, as\\nit relates to 153(1)(xlvii) of the Summary Jurisdiction (Offences) Act\\nof Guyana.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/JLA.2018.020213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/JLA.2018.020213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇评论探讨了另一部过时的后殖民法律是如何在一个前英国殖民地,在运动、全球变化和上诉法院的行动中被推翻的。此前,最高法院于2018年对特立尼达和多巴哥的杰森·琼斯(Jason jones)一案作出历史性裁决,裁定现行法律禁止双方同意的成人性交和同性成年人之间的性行为违宪。这次审查进一步强调了该地区进一步的社会和社会法律变革,这对未来对“成文”后殖民法律的挑战具有直接影响。我的评论着眼于最近的判例法,这些判例法推翻了圭亚那维多利亚时代的异装禁令,因为它涉及圭亚那简易管辖权(罪行)法案的153(1)(xlvii)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Striking Down Victorian-Era Cross-Dressing Law in Public Ban
This review considers how another outdated postcolonial law has been struck down in a former British colony amidst campaigns, global change and action by an appellate court. This follows from the historic 2018 Supreme Court ruling from Trinidad and Tobago in the Jason Jones judgement, in which it was decided that existing laws prohibiting consensual adult intercourse and sexual acts between consenting same-sex adults were unconstitutional. This review adds to that decision to highlight further social and sociolegal change in the region which has direct implications for future challenges to postcolonial laws which are ‘sitting on the books’. My review looks at recent case law which has overturned Guyana’s Victorian-era cross-dressing prohibition, as it relates to 153(1)(xlvii) of the Summary Jurisdiction (Offences) Act of Guyana.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Concorde's Tyres Reckoning with Law—and with Legal Anthropology Durable Resolutions Indigenous Peoples and Criminal Justice Legal aid amid bureaucracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1