{"title":"协同司法的扩散:毒品法院发展中的学习政治","authors":"Maxwell Mak, J. Rutledge","doi":"10.1080/0098261X.2019.1643269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We investigate the creation of county-level drug courts in California, Florida, and New York and seek to answer the following questions: (1) what conditions are necessary for the adoption of institutional innovations by the judiciary; and (2) what conditions will encourage or deter the spread of these innovations? We find that preconditions against these alternative approaches can be overcome through the diffusion mechanism of learning and demonstrate that policy diffusion is most important when viewed as having a conditional relationship with institutional and political context. When viewed as a dynamic relationship, we also find that diffusion mechanisms do not operate only in a positive direction and, instead, can work to mitigate or amplify government opposition to changes in judicial approaches.","PeriodicalId":45509,"journal":{"name":"Justice System Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"238 - 258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diffusion of Collaborative Justice: The Politics of Learning in the Development of Drug Courts\",\"authors\":\"Maxwell Mak, J. Rutledge\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0098261X.2019.1643269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We investigate the creation of county-level drug courts in California, Florida, and New York and seek to answer the following questions: (1) what conditions are necessary for the adoption of institutional innovations by the judiciary; and (2) what conditions will encourage or deter the spread of these innovations? We find that preconditions against these alternative approaches can be overcome through the diffusion mechanism of learning and demonstrate that policy diffusion is most important when viewed as having a conditional relationship with institutional and political context. When viewed as a dynamic relationship, we also find that diffusion mechanisms do not operate only in a positive direction and, instead, can work to mitigate or amplify government opposition to changes in judicial approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Justice System Journal\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"238 - 258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Justice System Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2019.1643269\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justice System Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2019.1643269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Diffusion of Collaborative Justice: The Politics of Learning in the Development of Drug Courts
Abstract We investigate the creation of county-level drug courts in California, Florida, and New York and seek to answer the following questions: (1) what conditions are necessary for the adoption of institutional innovations by the judiciary; and (2) what conditions will encourage or deter the spread of these innovations? We find that preconditions against these alternative approaches can be overcome through the diffusion mechanism of learning and demonstrate that policy diffusion is most important when viewed as having a conditional relationship with institutional and political context. When viewed as a dynamic relationship, we also find that diffusion mechanisms do not operate only in a positive direction and, instead, can work to mitigate or amplify government opposition to changes in judicial approaches.
期刊介绍:
The Justice System Journal is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes original research articles on all aspects of law, courts, court administration, judicial behavior, and the impact of all of these on public and social policy. Open as to methodological approaches, The Justice System Journal aims to use the latest in advanced social science research and analysis to bridge the gap between practicing and academic law, courts and politics communities. The Justice System Journal invites submission of original articles and research notes that are likely to be of interest to scholars and practitioners in the field of law, courts, and judicial administration, broadly defined. Articles may draw on a variety of research approaches in the social sciences. The journal does not publish articles devoted to extended analysis of legal doctrine such as a law review might publish, although short manuscripts analyzing cases or legal issues are welcome and will be considered for the Legal Notes section. The Justice System Journal was created in 1974 by the Institute for Court Management and is published under the auspices of the National Center for State Courts. The Justice System Journal features peer-reviewed research articles as well as reviews of important books in law and courts, and analytical research notes on some of the leading cases from state and federal courts. The journal periodically produces special issues that provide analysis of fundamental and timely issues on law and courts from both national and international perspectives.