协同司法的扩散:毒品法院发展中的学习政治

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q3 Social Sciences Justice System Journal Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/0098261X.2019.1643269
Maxwell Mak, J. Rutledge
{"title":"协同司法的扩散:毒品法院发展中的学习政治","authors":"Maxwell Mak, J. Rutledge","doi":"10.1080/0098261X.2019.1643269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We investigate the creation of county-level drug courts in California, Florida, and New York and seek to answer the following questions: (1) what conditions are necessary for the adoption of institutional innovations by the judiciary; and (2) what conditions will encourage or deter the spread of these innovations? We find that preconditions against these alternative approaches can be overcome through the diffusion mechanism of learning and demonstrate that policy diffusion is most important when viewed as having a conditional relationship with institutional and political context. When viewed as a dynamic relationship, we also find that diffusion mechanisms do not operate only in a positive direction and, instead, can work to mitigate or amplify government opposition to changes in judicial approaches.","PeriodicalId":45509,"journal":{"name":"Justice System Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"238 - 258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diffusion of Collaborative Justice: The Politics of Learning in the Development of Drug Courts\",\"authors\":\"Maxwell Mak, J. Rutledge\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0098261X.2019.1643269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We investigate the creation of county-level drug courts in California, Florida, and New York and seek to answer the following questions: (1) what conditions are necessary for the adoption of institutional innovations by the judiciary; and (2) what conditions will encourage or deter the spread of these innovations? We find that preconditions against these alternative approaches can be overcome through the diffusion mechanism of learning and demonstrate that policy diffusion is most important when viewed as having a conditional relationship with institutional and political context. When viewed as a dynamic relationship, we also find that diffusion mechanisms do not operate only in a positive direction and, instead, can work to mitigate or amplify government opposition to changes in judicial approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Justice System Journal\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"238 - 258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Justice System Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2019.1643269\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justice System Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2019.1643269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文以加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州和纽约州的县级毒品法院为研究对象,试图回答以下问题:(1)司法机构采用制度创新的必要条件是什么;(2)什么条件会鼓励或阻碍这些创新的传播?我们发现,可以通过学习的扩散机制克服这些替代方法的前提条件,并证明当政策扩散被视为与制度和政治背景具有条件关系时,政策扩散是最重要的。当被视为一种动态关系时,我们还发现扩散机制不仅朝着积极的方向运作,而且可以减轻或扩大政府对司法方法变化的反对。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Diffusion of Collaborative Justice: The Politics of Learning in the Development of Drug Courts
Abstract We investigate the creation of county-level drug courts in California, Florida, and New York and seek to answer the following questions: (1) what conditions are necessary for the adoption of institutional innovations by the judiciary; and (2) what conditions will encourage or deter the spread of these innovations? We find that preconditions against these alternative approaches can be overcome through the diffusion mechanism of learning and demonstrate that policy diffusion is most important when viewed as having a conditional relationship with institutional and political context. When viewed as a dynamic relationship, we also find that diffusion mechanisms do not operate only in a positive direction and, instead, can work to mitigate or amplify government opposition to changes in judicial approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Justice System Journal is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes original research articles on all aspects of law, courts, court administration, judicial behavior, and the impact of all of these on public and social policy. Open as to methodological approaches, The Justice System Journal aims to use the latest in advanced social science research and analysis to bridge the gap between practicing and academic law, courts and politics communities. The Justice System Journal invites submission of original articles and research notes that are likely to be of interest to scholars and practitioners in the field of law, courts, and judicial administration, broadly defined. Articles may draw on a variety of research approaches in the social sciences. The journal does not publish articles devoted to extended analysis of legal doctrine such as a law review might publish, although short manuscripts analyzing cases or legal issues are welcome and will be considered for the Legal Notes section. The Justice System Journal was created in 1974 by the Institute for Court Management and is published under the auspices of the National Center for State Courts. The Justice System Journal features peer-reviewed research articles as well as reviews of important books in law and courts, and analytical research notes on some of the leading cases from state and federal courts. The journal periodically produces special issues that provide analysis of fundamental and timely issues on law and courts from both national and international perspectives.
期刊最新文献
State Supreme Court Responsiveness to Court Curbing: Examining the Use of Judicial Review The Effects of Jurors’ Initial Views of Jury Service on Predeliberation Preferences for Prosecution or Defense Emerging Hardball Confirmation Tactics and Public Support for the U.S. Supreme Court A War of Words Over Abortion: The Legal-Framing Contest Over the Undue Burden Standard Letter from the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1