量子力学是全部真理吗?

Q3 Medicine Activitas nervosa superior Pub Date : 2019-05-25 DOI:10.1063/1.2947702
A. Leggett
{"title":"量子力学是全部真理吗?","authors":"A. Leggett","doi":"10.1063/1.2947702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I draw an analogy between the “measurement paradox” of quantum mechanics in 2019 and the “Gibbs paradox” of statistical physics in 1875, and use it to argue that we have good reason to believe that the answer to the question in my title is “no”.","PeriodicalId":7153,"journal":{"name":"Activitas nervosa superior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Quantum Mechanics the Whole Truth?\",\"authors\":\"A. Leggett\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/1.2947702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I draw an analogy between the “measurement paradox” of quantum mechanics in 2019 and the “Gibbs paradox” of statistical physics in 1875, and use it to argue that we have good reason to believe that the answer to the question in my title is “no”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Activitas nervosa superior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Activitas nervosa superior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2947702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Activitas nervosa superior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2947702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我将2019年量子力学的“测量悖论”与1875年统计物理学的“吉布斯悖论”进行了类比,并用它来证明,我们有充分的理由相信,我的标题中问题的答案是“不”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is Quantum Mechanics the Whole Truth?
I draw an analogy between the “measurement paradox” of quantum mechanics in 2019 and the “Gibbs paradox” of statistical physics in 1875, and use it to argue that we have good reason to believe that the answer to the question in my title is “no”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Activitas nervosa superior
Activitas nervosa superior Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cognitive and Brain Reserve in Psychotic Disorders: an Overview of Current Research and Treatment Implications From Consciousness to Brain-Sign: a Neurobiological Reconstruction “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Is Associated with Top-Down Visual Attention For a Typology of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations Based on their Content Thermodynamic Implications of the Fermionic Mind Hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1