根据健康保障体系对紧急服务的满意度

F.A. Dávila , J.S. Herrera , D.A. Yasnó , L.C. Forero , M.V. Alvarado
{"title":"根据健康保障体系对紧急服务的满意度","authors":"F.A. Dávila ,&nbsp;J.S. Herrera ,&nbsp;D.A. Yasnó ,&nbsp;L.C. Forero ,&nbsp;M.V. Alvarado","doi":"10.1016/j.cali.2016.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Health satisfaction is a fundamental measure of the quality of health services. This study aims to validate and analyse the results of a quality of care questionnaire to assess the level of satisfaction of patients attended in the emergency department of a high complexity hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Observational, cross-sectional study, with a questionnaire designed to assess the quality of service and satisfaction at the end of care in the emergency department. Descriptive statistics of scale were established and presented, as well as determining the construct validity, overall reliability, internal and concurrent validity of an overall against a uni-dimensional scale.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 5,961 records were reviewed, most of them (77.3%) reported by patients in the Mandatory Health Plan. High levels of satisfaction overall and by subgroups were found. There were no significant differences between subgroups, with 86.8 for those with Pre-paid Medical Care Plan and 84.4 for mandatory health plan. Cronbach's alpha for the questionnaire was 0.90.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The questionnaire proved to be reliable and valid in determining the quality and satisfaction with care. The results showed high levels of satisfaction overall and in the domains. A low consistency between the results of the multidimensional and unidimensional satisfaction scales suggests that there were aspects of satisfaction not investigated on the multidimensional scale. Ecologically-designed before and after studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in satisfaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101101,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","volume":"32 2","pages":"Pages 89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2016.06.010","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Satisfacción en un servicio de urgencias según el sistema de aseguramiento en salud\",\"authors\":\"F.A. Dávila ,&nbsp;J.S. Herrera ,&nbsp;D.A. Yasnó ,&nbsp;L.C. Forero ,&nbsp;M.V. Alvarado\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cali.2016.06.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Health satisfaction is a fundamental measure of the quality of health services. This study aims to validate and analyse the results of a quality of care questionnaire to assess the level of satisfaction of patients attended in the emergency department of a high complexity hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Observational, cross-sectional study, with a questionnaire designed to assess the quality of service and satisfaction at the end of care in the emergency department. Descriptive statistics of scale were established and presented, as well as determining the construct validity, overall reliability, internal and concurrent validity of an overall against a uni-dimensional scale.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 5,961 records were reviewed, most of them (77.3%) reported by patients in the Mandatory Health Plan. High levels of satisfaction overall and by subgroups were found. There were no significant differences between subgroups, with 86.8 for those with Pre-paid Medical Care Plan and 84.4 for mandatory health plan. Cronbach's alpha for the questionnaire was 0.90.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The questionnaire proved to be reliable and valid in determining the quality and satisfaction with care. The results showed high levels of satisfaction overall and in the domains. A low consistency between the results of the multidimensional and unidimensional satisfaction scales suggests that there were aspects of satisfaction not investigated on the multidimensional scale. Ecologically-designed before and after studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in satisfaction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 89-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2016.06.010\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X1630118X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X1630118X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

健康满意度是衡量卫生服务质量的基本标准。本研究旨在验证和分析一份护理质量问卷的结果,以评估在高复杂性医院急诊科就诊的病人的满意度。方法采用观察性横断面研究,设计问卷,评估急诊科临终服务质量和满意度。建立并给出了量表的描述性统计,并确定了量表对一维量表的构念效度、整体信度、内部效度和并发效度。结果共审查5961份病历,其中大部分(77.3%)为强制性健康计划患者报告。总体满意度和分组满意度都很高。亚组间无显著差异,预付费医疗计划组为86.8,强制性健康计划组为84.4。问卷的Cronbach's alpha为0.90。结论该问卷在评价护理质量和护理满意度方面是可靠有效的。结果显示,总体和领域的满意度都很高。多维度和单维满意度量表的结果之间的低一致性表明,多维度量表上没有调查满意度的某些方面。需要进行生态设计前后的研究来评估干预措施在满意度方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Satisfacción en un servicio de urgencias según el sistema de aseguramiento en salud

Introduction

Health satisfaction is a fundamental measure of the quality of health services. This study aims to validate and analyse the results of a quality of care questionnaire to assess the level of satisfaction of patients attended in the emergency department of a high complexity hospital.

Methods

Observational, cross-sectional study, with a questionnaire designed to assess the quality of service and satisfaction at the end of care in the emergency department. Descriptive statistics of scale were established and presented, as well as determining the construct validity, overall reliability, internal and concurrent validity of an overall against a uni-dimensional scale.

Results

A total of 5,961 records were reviewed, most of them (77.3%) reported by patients in the Mandatory Health Plan. High levels of satisfaction overall and by subgroups were found. There were no significant differences between subgroups, with 86.8 for those with Pre-paid Medical Care Plan and 84.4 for mandatory health plan. Cronbach's alpha for the questionnaire was 0.90.

Conclusions

The questionnaire proved to be reliable and valid in determining the quality and satisfaction with care. The results showed high levels of satisfaction overall and in the domains. A low consistency between the results of the multidimensional and unidimensional satisfaction scales suggests that there were aspects of satisfaction not investigated on the multidimensional scale. Ecologically-designed before and after studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Del papel a las nuevas tecnologías en la comunicación con nuestros pacientes Impacto de un programa de gestión de riesgo en la tasa de úlceras por presión La enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC): ¿esa gran conocida? Reflexiones sobre cómo mejorar la calidad diagnóstica El capital social como determinante de salud pública Efectividad de la evaluación de historias clínicas informatizadas en un hospital universitario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1