从伦敦使用全科医生服务的艾滋病毒感染者的经验中学习:一项定性研究

P. Keogh, P. Weatherburn, D. Reid
{"title":"从伦敦使用全科医生服务的艾滋病毒感染者的经验中学习:一项定性研究","authors":"P. Keogh, P. Weatherburn, D. Reid","doi":"10.1017/S1463423615000481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To explore the experiences of people with HIV (PWHIV) using general practitioner (GP) services in order to identify barriers to use. Background Traditionally, GPs have little involvement in the care of PWHIV. However, as HIV becomes a chronic condition and the population of PWHIV ages, there is a need to increase this involvement. Despite high levels of GP registration, the majority of PWHIV in London report that their GP is not involved in their HIV care. Methods This paper presents qualitative findings from a mixed method study of PWHIV’s experiences of clinical services. Survey respondents were purposively sampled to recruit 51 PWHIV who took part in eight focus groups. Participants were asked about their experience of using GP services. Findings Three factors emerged which mediated experiences of GP care. Competence: respondents were concerned about the potential for misdiagnosis of symptoms, lack of awareness of the health needs of PWHIV and experiences of prescribing, which could lead to drug interactions. Continuity: not being able to get appointments quickly enough, not being able to see the same doctor twice and not being able to keep the same GP when one changed address were experienced as impediments to use. Communication: lack of communication between GPs and HIV specialists led to what participants called ‘patient ping-pong’ where they found themselves acting as a go-between for different clinical specialists trying to make sense of their care. Conclusion Meaningful contact between HIV specialists and GPs is likely to allay concerns about competency as treatment and care decisions can be taken collaboratively between the GP, HIV specialist and patient. A key component of acceptable GP care for PWHIV is likely to be the application of long-term condition management approaches, which includes empowered patient self-management.","PeriodicalId":20471,"journal":{"name":"Primary Health Care Research & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning from the experiences of people with HIV using general practitioner services in London: a qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"P. Keogh, P. Weatherburn, D. Reid\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1463423615000481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim To explore the experiences of people with HIV (PWHIV) using general practitioner (GP) services in order to identify barriers to use. Background Traditionally, GPs have little involvement in the care of PWHIV. However, as HIV becomes a chronic condition and the population of PWHIV ages, there is a need to increase this involvement. Despite high levels of GP registration, the majority of PWHIV in London report that their GP is not involved in their HIV care. Methods This paper presents qualitative findings from a mixed method study of PWHIV’s experiences of clinical services. Survey respondents were purposively sampled to recruit 51 PWHIV who took part in eight focus groups. Participants were asked about their experience of using GP services. Findings Three factors emerged which mediated experiences of GP care. Competence: respondents were concerned about the potential for misdiagnosis of symptoms, lack of awareness of the health needs of PWHIV and experiences of prescribing, which could lead to drug interactions. Continuity: not being able to get appointments quickly enough, not being able to see the same doctor twice and not being able to keep the same GP when one changed address were experienced as impediments to use. Communication: lack of communication between GPs and HIV specialists led to what participants called ‘patient ping-pong’ where they found themselves acting as a go-between for different clinical specialists trying to make sense of their care. Conclusion Meaningful contact between HIV specialists and GPs is likely to allay concerns about competency as treatment and care decisions can be taken collaboratively between the GP, HIV specialist and patient. A key component of acceptable GP care for PWHIV is likely to be the application of long-term condition management approaches, which includes empowered patient self-management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary Health Care Research & Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary Health Care Research & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423615000481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Health Care Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423615000481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的探讨艾滋病毒感染者(PWHIV)使用全科医生(GP)服务的经历,以确定使用障碍。传统上,全科医生很少参与PWHIV的护理。然而,随着艾滋病毒成为一种慢性病和艾滋病毒感染者的年龄增长,有必要增加这种参与。尽管全科医生的注册率很高,但伦敦大多数艾滋病毒感染者报告说,他们的全科医生没有参与他们的艾滋病毒护理。方法采用混合方法对PWHIV的临床服务经验进行定性研究。有针对性地对调查对象进行抽样,以招募51名参加八个焦点小组的PWHIV。参与者被问及他们使用全科医生服务的经历。发现有三个因素介导全科医生护理体验。能力:答复者担心可能误诊症状、缺乏对艾滋病毒感染者健康需求的认识和处方经验,这可能导致药物相互作用。连续性:不能足够快地预约,不能看同一个医生两次,当一个地址改变时不能保持同一个全科医生,这些都是使用的障碍。沟通:全科医生和艾滋病专家之间缺乏沟通导致了参与者所谓的“病人乒乓”,他们发现自己在不同的临床专家之间充当中间人,试图理解他们的护理。结论:艾滋病毒专家和全科医生之间有意义的接触可能会减轻对能力的担忧,因为治疗和护理决策可以在全科医生、艾滋病毒专家和患者之间共同做出。PWHIV患者可接受的全科医生护理的一个关键组成部分可能是长期病情管理方法的应用,其中包括授权患者自我管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning from the experiences of people with HIV using general practitioner services in London: a qualitative study
Aim To explore the experiences of people with HIV (PWHIV) using general practitioner (GP) services in order to identify barriers to use. Background Traditionally, GPs have little involvement in the care of PWHIV. However, as HIV becomes a chronic condition and the population of PWHIV ages, there is a need to increase this involvement. Despite high levels of GP registration, the majority of PWHIV in London report that their GP is not involved in their HIV care. Methods This paper presents qualitative findings from a mixed method study of PWHIV’s experiences of clinical services. Survey respondents were purposively sampled to recruit 51 PWHIV who took part in eight focus groups. Participants were asked about their experience of using GP services. Findings Three factors emerged which mediated experiences of GP care. Competence: respondents were concerned about the potential for misdiagnosis of symptoms, lack of awareness of the health needs of PWHIV and experiences of prescribing, which could lead to drug interactions. Continuity: not being able to get appointments quickly enough, not being able to see the same doctor twice and not being able to keep the same GP when one changed address were experienced as impediments to use. Communication: lack of communication between GPs and HIV specialists led to what participants called ‘patient ping-pong’ where they found themselves acting as a go-between for different clinical specialists trying to make sense of their care. Conclusion Meaningful contact between HIV specialists and GPs is likely to allay concerns about competency as treatment and care decisions can be taken collaboratively between the GP, HIV specialist and patient. A key component of acceptable GP care for PWHIV is likely to be the application of long-term condition management approaches, which includes empowered patient self-management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health risk appraisal in older people 7: long-acting benzodiazepine use in community-dwelling older adults in London: is it related to physical or psychological factors? Collaborative Care model in mental health. Scope and experiences after three years of activity in Mexico City Health team for the elderly: a feasibility study for preventive home visits Primary care and the public’s health: evidence from service development initiatives Perception of measures for dealing with Ebola disease in primary care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1