{"title":"外部环绕细节对采光模拟结果的影响","authors":"R. Sadeghi, R. Mistrick","doi":"10.1080/15502724.2021.1947313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The accuracy of daylighting simulations for the built environment strongly depends on the modeling of the exterior surround. The practice of modeling a space with a flat ground surface with little or no external architectural or landscape elements, particularly early in the design phase, is often applied. In this study, this approach and a number of different levels of detail for modeling the exterior surround were investigated by comparing real-life empirical measurements with their corresponding simulation results. A total of 13 different exterior views were studied under 15 different sky/seasonal conditions to investigate the contribution of the surrounding features to the daylight delivered inside a small office. These features were classified into one of four different groups – sky, architectural structures, standing vegetation, and horizontal ground. Five of these locations were chosen for further simulation by applying six levels of detail to the exterior surround in a simulation model. The results reveal that ignoring exterior surround objects (common practice for some) yielded an average error of 67.9%, while a high level of detail (which applied high polygon vegetation representations) resulted in an average error of only 11.3%. A detailed model of the surround with the IES LM-83 suggested method of modeling trees resulted in an average error of 22.8%.","PeriodicalId":49911,"journal":{"name":"Leukos","volume":"124 2 1","pages":"341 - 356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Exterior Surround Detail on Daylighting Simulation Results\",\"authors\":\"R. Sadeghi, R. Mistrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15502724.2021.1947313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The accuracy of daylighting simulations for the built environment strongly depends on the modeling of the exterior surround. The practice of modeling a space with a flat ground surface with little or no external architectural or landscape elements, particularly early in the design phase, is often applied. In this study, this approach and a number of different levels of detail for modeling the exterior surround were investigated by comparing real-life empirical measurements with their corresponding simulation results. A total of 13 different exterior views were studied under 15 different sky/seasonal conditions to investigate the contribution of the surrounding features to the daylight delivered inside a small office. These features were classified into one of four different groups – sky, architectural structures, standing vegetation, and horizontal ground. Five of these locations were chosen for further simulation by applying six levels of detail to the exterior surround in a simulation model. The results reveal that ignoring exterior surround objects (common practice for some) yielded an average error of 67.9%, while a high level of detail (which applied high polygon vegetation representations) resulted in an average error of only 11.3%. A detailed model of the surround with the IES LM-83 suggested method of modeling trees resulted in an average error of 22.8%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukos\",\"volume\":\"124 2 1\",\"pages\":\"341 - 356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2021.1947313\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukos","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2021.1947313","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Exterior Surround Detail on Daylighting Simulation Results
ABSTRACT The accuracy of daylighting simulations for the built environment strongly depends on the modeling of the exterior surround. The practice of modeling a space with a flat ground surface with little or no external architectural or landscape elements, particularly early in the design phase, is often applied. In this study, this approach and a number of different levels of detail for modeling the exterior surround were investigated by comparing real-life empirical measurements with their corresponding simulation results. A total of 13 different exterior views were studied under 15 different sky/seasonal conditions to investigate the contribution of the surrounding features to the daylight delivered inside a small office. These features were classified into one of four different groups – sky, architectural structures, standing vegetation, and horizontal ground. Five of these locations were chosen for further simulation by applying six levels of detail to the exterior surround in a simulation model. The results reveal that ignoring exterior surround objects (common practice for some) yielded an average error of 67.9%, while a high level of detail (which applied high polygon vegetation representations) resulted in an average error of only 11.3%. A detailed model of the surround with the IES LM-83 suggested method of modeling trees resulted in an average error of 22.8%.
期刊介绍:
The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America and our publisher Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America and our publisher Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America and our publisher Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America and our publisher Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .