在高等教育机构中翻译政府数字化政策:丹麦案例

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy Pub Date : 2020-12-11 DOI:10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-04-03
Sanne Haase, Lillian Buus
{"title":"在高等教育机构中翻译政府数字化政策:丹麦案例","authors":"Sanne Haase, Lillian Buus","doi":"10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-04-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Danish national government (2018) prioritises a proactive digitalisation of the public sector, including higher education institutions (HEIs). HEIs are facing major changes and need to integrate increasingly advanced digital technologies, and might soon be significantly different from what they are today. The mechanisms linking national policy discourses and the implementation of actual, new practices are not well documented. Drawing from the insights of Scandinavian neo-institutionalism and discursive institutionalism about the travelling and translation of ideas in specific national and organisational contexts, the article investigates one aspect of this broader problem— that is, how national digitalisation policy is discursively translated into institutional policy at the level of HEIs. We focus on three large, comprehensive research universities and on two of the profession-oriented university colleges. Based on our analysis of digitalisation policies, we conduct a comparative analysis to illuminate the translation of national policy ideas into the digitalisation policies of HEIs Findings indicate that the what, the how and the why of Danish HEIs’ digitalisation policies do not come together in a coherent order of discourse. Rather, Danish HEIs catch on to singular elements of national policy ideas in an eclectic and fragmented manner. This might also be connected to the vagueness of definitions of digitalisation in national policy documents, which might be acting as an obstacle for more coherent translation processes at the HEI level.","PeriodicalId":44945,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy","volume":"83 1","pages":"246-258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translating government digitalisation policy in higher education institutions: the Danish case\",\"authors\":\"Sanne Haase, Lillian Buus\",\"doi\":\"10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-04-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Danish national government (2018) prioritises a proactive digitalisation of the public sector, including higher education institutions (HEIs). HEIs are facing major changes and need to integrate increasingly advanced digital technologies, and might soon be significantly different from what they are today. The mechanisms linking national policy discourses and the implementation of actual, new practices are not well documented. Drawing from the insights of Scandinavian neo-institutionalism and discursive institutionalism about the travelling and translation of ideas in specific national and organisational contexts, the article investigates one aspect of this broader problem— that is, how national digitalisation policy is discursively translated into institutional policy at the level of HEIs. We focus on three large, comprehensive research universities and on two of the profession-oriented university colleges. Based on our analysis of digitalisation policies, we conduct a comparative analysis to illuminate the translation of national policy ideas into the digitalisation policies of HEIs Findings indicate that the what, the how and the why of Danish HEIs’ digitalisation policies do not come together in a coherent order of discourse. Rather, Danish HEIs catch on to singular elements of national policy ideas in an eclectic and fragmented manner. This might also be connected to the vagueness of definitions of digitalisation in national policy documents, which might be acting as an obstacle for more coherent translation processes at the HEI level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"246-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-04-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-04-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

丹麦国家政府(2018年)优先考虑公共部门的主动数字化,包括高等教育机构(HEIs)。高等教育院校正面临重大变革,需要整合越来越先进的数码科技,可能很快就会与现在有很大的不同。将国家政策话语与实际新做法的执行联系起来的机制没有得到很好的记录。根据斯堪的纳维亚新制度主义和话语制度主义对特定国家和组织背景下思想传播和翻译的见解,本文研究了这一更广泛问题的一个方面——即国家数字化政策如何在高等教育机构层面上被话语转化为制度政策。我们专注于三所大型综合性研究型大学和两所专业型大学学院。基于我们对数字化政策的分析,我们进行了一项比较分析,以阐明将国家政策理念转化为高等学校数字化政策的过程。研究结果表明,丹麦高等学校数字化政策的内容、方式和原因没有以连贯的话语顺序汇集在一起。相反,丹麦的高等教育机构以一种折衷和分散的方式抓住了国家政策理念的单一元素。这也可能与国家政策文件中数字化定义的模糊性有关,这可能成为高等教育层面更连贯的翻译过程的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Translating government digitalisation policy in higher education institutions: the Danish case
The Danish national government (2018) prioritises a proactive digitalisation of the public sector, including higher education institutions (HEIs). HEIs are facing major changes and need to integrate increasingly advanced digital technologies, and might soon be significantly different from what they are today. The mechanisms linking national policy discourses and the implementation of actual, new practices are not well documented. Drawing from the insights of Scandinavian neo-institutionalism and discursive institutionalism about the travelling and translation of ideas in specific national and organisational contexts, the article investigates one aspect of this broader problem— that is, how national digitalisation policy is discursively translated into institutional policy at the level of HEIs. We focus on three large, comprehensive research universities and on two of the profession-oriented university colleges. Based on our analysis of digitalisation policies, we conduct a comparative analysis to illuminate the translation of national policy ideas into the digitalisation policies of HEIs Findings indicate that the what, the how and the why of Danish HEIs’ digitalisation policies do not come together in a coherent order of discourse. Rather, Danish HEIs catch on to singular elements of national policy ideas in an eclectic and fragmented manner. This might also be connected to the vagueness of definitions of digitalisation in national policy documents, which might be acting as an obstacle for more coherent translation processes at the HEI level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Why Are Norwegian Education Authorities Digitising Education? Digital nødundervisning under covid-19-nedstengning Physiotherapy Students’ Shaping of Digital Learning Practices: Characteristics, Opportunities and Challenges Reading in the digital age Læringsanalyse – tilbakeblikk og frampek
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1