Tseng等人对关于文章“药物和心脏植入电子设备治疗心力衰竭和射血分数降低患者的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析”的回应。

A. Tseng, K. Kunze, S. Mulpuru
{"title":"Tseng等人对关于文章“药物和心脏植入电子设备治疗心力衰竭和射血分数降低患者的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析”的回应。","authors":"A. Tseng, K. Kunze, S. Mulpuru","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"August 2019 1 Andrew S. Tseng, MD Katie L. Kunze, PhD Siva K. Mulpuru, MD In Response: We greatly appreciate the commentary by Zamani and Wininger in regard to our recent network meta-analysis on pharmacological and cardiac implantable electronic device therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.1 Their response to our article was meticulous and insightful, and we are privileged to be able to respond to their concerns. We agree with the commentators on the limitations of our design for Figure 6 and acknowledge errors in its construction. Figure 6 attempts to visually represent the temporal relationship between the number of pharmacological versus device studies and mean all-cause mortality incidence rates. We did not intend for Figure 6 to answer the question on overall comparative efficacy of medications versus devices in reducing all-cause mortality. The sole purpose of this supporting figure is to visually demonstrate the trend of all-cause mortality rates in heart failure trials over time. To more accurately represent the data and our intentions with this figure, we have revised the figure to be a bubbleplot, weighted by study sample size and study duration (in person-years). We also thank the commentators for mentioning the misattribution of the study years with the publication years, and we have rectified this in our new figure. Regrettably, Figure 6 had included additional studies from an older version of the data, and in the final publication, Figure 6 had not been updated to reflect only those studies included in the final analysis. All other figures and analyses in the article were derived from the final data. The revised figure is provided here and online (Figure). The raw data used to construct the figure have been provided online (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/15YnklLuvORw 0oYSPLOcSYMk2WAuuAeGL?usp=sharing). Overall, our study is intended to assist clinicians and researchers generate hypotheses for the various roles of medications and devices in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. We thank the commentators for their thoughtful analysis and comments and believe that the revised figure more accurately represents the data and the intended scope of the figure.","PeriodicalId":10167,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response by Tseng et al to Letter Regarding Article, \\\"Efficacy of Pharmacologic and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Therapies in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis\\\".\",\"authors\":\"A. Tseng, K. Kunze, S. Mulpuru\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"August 2019 1 Andrew S. Tseng, MD Katie L. Kunze, PhD Siva K. Mulpuru, MD In Response: We greatly appreciate the commentary by Zamani and Wininger in regard to our recent network meta-analysis on pharmacological and cardiac implantable electronic device therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.1 Their response to our article was meticulous and insightful, and we are privileged to be able to respond to their concerns. We agree with the commentators on the limitations of our design for Figure 6 and acknowledge errors in its construction. Figure 6 attempts to visually represent the temporal relationship between the number of pharmacological versus device studies and mean all-cause mortality incidence rates. We did not intend for Figure 6 to answer the question on overall comparative efficacy of medications versus devices in reducing all-cause mortality. The sole purpose of this supporting figure is to visually demonstrate the trend of all-cause mortality rates in heart failure trials over time. To more accurately represent the data and our intentions with this figure, we have revised the figure to be a bubbleplot, weighted by study sample size and study duration (in person-years). We also thank the commentators for mentioning the misattribution of the study years with the publication years, and we have rectified this in our new figure. Regrettably, Figure 6 had included additional studies from an older version of the data, and in the final publication, Figure 6 had not been updated to reflect only those studies included in the final analysis. All other figures and analyses in the article were derived from the final data. The revised figure is provided here and online (Figure). The raw data used to construct the figure have been provided online (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/15YnklLuvORw 0oYSPLOcSYMk2WAuuAeGL?usp=sharing). Overall, our study is intended to assist clinicians and researchers generate hypotheses for the various roles of medications and devices in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. We thank the commentators for their thoughtful analysis and comments and believe that the revised figure more accurately represents the data and the intended scope of the figure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1 Andrew S. Tseng医学博士Katie L. Kunze博士Siva K. Mulpuru医学博士回应:我们非常感谢Zamani和Wininger关于我们最近关于药物和心脏植入式电子设备治疗心力衰竭降低射血分数的网络荟萃分析的评论他们对我们文章的回应是细致而深刻的,我们很荣幸能够回应他们的担忧。我们同意评论者对图6设计的局限性的看法,并承认其构造中的错误。图6试图直观地表示药理学与器械研究数量与平均全因死亡率之间的时间关系。我们不打算用图6来回答关于药物与器械在降低全因死亡率方面的总体比较疗效的问题。这个支持数据的唯一目的是直观地展示心力衰竭试验中全因死亡率随时间的变化趋势。为了更准确地表示数据和我们的意图,我们将该图修改为气泡图,按研究样本量和研究持续时间(以人年为单位)加权。我们也感谢评论者提到的研究年份与出版年份的错误归属,我们已经在我们的新数据中纠正了这一点。遗憾的是,图6包含了来自旧版本数据的额外研究,并且在最终出版物中,图6没有更新以仅反映最终分析中包含的那些研究。文中其他所有的数据和分析均来源于最终数据。修改后的数字在这里和网上提供(图)。用于构建该图的原始数据已在网上提供(https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/15YnklLuvORw 0oYSPLOcSYMk2WAuuAeGL?usp=sharing)。总的来说,我们的研究旨在帮助临床医生和研究人员对药物和设备在治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低中的各种作用提出假设。我们感谢评论员们深思熟虑的分析和评论,并相信修订后的数字更准确地反映了数据和数字的预期范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response by Tseng et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Efficacy of Pharmacologic and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Therapies in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis".
August 2019 1 Andrew S. Tseng, MD Katie L. Kunze, PhD Siva K. Mulpuru, MD In Response: We greatly appreciate the commentary by Zamani and Wininger in regard to our recent network meta-analysis on pharmacological and cardiac implantable electronic device therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.1 Their response to our article was meticulous and insightful, and we are privileged to be able to respond to their concerns. We agree with the commentators on the limitations of our design for Figure 6 and acknowledge errors in its construction. Figure 6 attempts to visually represent the temporal relationship between the number of pharmacological versus device studies and mean all-cause mortality incidence rates. We did not intend for Figure 6 to answer the question on overall comparative efficacy of medications versus devices in reducing all-cause mortality. The sole purpose of this supporting figure is to visually demonstrate the trend of all-cause mortality rates in heart failure trials over time. To more accurately represent the data and our intentions with this figure, we have revised the figure to be a bubbleplot, weighted by study sample size and study duration (in person-years). We also thank the commentators for mentioning the misattribution of the study years with the publication years, and we have rectified this in our new figure. Regrettably, Figure 6 had included additional studies from an older version of the data, and in the final publication, Figure 6 had not been updated to reflect only those studies included in the final analysis. All other figures and analyses in the article were derived from the final data. The revised figure is provided here and online (Figure). The raw data used to construct the figure have been provided online (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/15YnklLuvORw 0oYSPLOcSYMk2WAuuAeGL?usp=sharing). Overall, our study is intended to assist clinicians and researchers generate hypotheses for the various roles of medications and devices in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. We thank the commentators for their thoughtful analysis and comments and believe that the revised figure more accurately represents the data and the intended scope of the figure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coronary Sinus Metabolite 12,13-diHOME Is a Novel Biomarker for Left Atrial Remodeling in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Impact of Contact Force on Pulsed Field Ablation Outcomes Using Focal Point Catheter Characteristics of Right-Sided Accessory Pathways Associated With Right Cardiac Veins Prognostic Impact of Sinus Rhythm in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Separating Rhythm Outcomes From Randomized Strategy Findings From the CABANA Trial Trends Favoring an Anatomical Approach to Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating From the Left Ventricular Summit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1