美国性少数群体男性的性同意暗示

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Sexuality Pub Date : 2021-05-28 DOI:10.1080/19419899.2021.1936141
T. Marcantonio, Andrew M. O’Neil, K. Jozkowski
{"title":"美国性少数群体男性的性同意暗示","authors":"T. Marcantonio, Andrew M. O’Neil, K. Jozkowski","doi":"10.1080/19419899.2021.1936141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Sexual consent research often focuses on how those who identify as heterosexual communicate consent, with limited research examining how sexual minority (SM) men communicate consent. Factors that influence how people communicate consent – such as the type of sexual behaviour being consented to and the relationship status of those engaged in sexual behaviour – is understudied among SM men. The purpose of this exploratory study was to assess how SM men communicate sexual consent and examine if these factors influence how men consent to sex. SM men (N = 234) were recruited from social media and Qualtrics’ panel. Participants completed an open-ended survey assessing how consent was communicated during oral and anal sex and who their partner was during this encounter. Responses were analysed using an inductive coding approach. Six overarching consent cues emerged: Explicit Verbal, Explicit Nonverbal, No-Response, Implicit Nonverbal, Virtual Consent and Implicit Verbal. Sexual consent communication appeared to vary by sexual behaviour and relationship status. Overall, SM men and people who identify as heterosexual appear to communicate sexual consent similarly; however, some new cues emerged for SM men. Consent education initiatives should consider findings from more diverse populations when discussing sexual consent to take a more inclusive approach to sexual health education.","PeriodicalId":51686,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Sexuality","volume":"2 1","pages":"863 - 879"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual consent cues among sexual minority men in the United States\",\"authors\":\"T. Marcantonio, Andrew M. O’Neil, K. Jozkowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19419899.2021.1936141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Sexual consent research often focuses on how those who identify as heterosexual communicate consent, with limited research examining how sexual minority (SM) men communicate consent. Factors that influence how people communicate consent – such as the type of sexual behaviour being consented to and the relationship status of those engaged in sexual behaviour – is understudied among SM men. The purpose of this exploratory study was to assess how SM men communicate sexual consent and examine if these factors influence how men consent to sex. SM men (N = 234) were recruited from social media and Qualtrics’ panel. Participants completed an open-ended survey assessing how consent was communicated during oral and anal sex and who their partner was during this encounter. Responses were analysed using an inductive coding approach. Six overarching consent cues emerged: Explicit Verbal, Explicit Nonverbal, No-Response, Implicit Nonverbal, Virtual Consent and Implicit Verbal. Sexual consent communication appeared to vary by sexual behaviour and relationship status. Overall, SM men and people who identify as heterosexual appear to communicate sexual consent similarly; however, some new cues emerged for SM men. Consent education initiatives should consider findings from more diverse populations when discussing sexual consent to take a more inclusive approach to sexual health education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology & Sexuality\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"863 - 879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology & Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1936141\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1936141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

性同意研究通常关注于那些自认为是异性恋的人如何表达同意,而对性少数(SM)男性如何表达同意的研究有限。影响人们如何表达同意的因素——比如被同意的性行为的类型以及参与性行为者的关系状况——在SM男性中没有得到充分的研究。本探索性研究的目的是评估SM男性如何沟通性同意,并检查这些因素是否影响男性如何同意性行为。SM男性(N = 234)是从社交媒体和qualics小组中招募的。参与者完成了一项开放式调查,评估在口交和肛交过程中如何表达同意,以及他们的伴侣是谁。反应分析使用归纳编码方法。六种主要的同意线索出现了:显性语言,显性非语言,无反应,隐性非语言,虚拟同意和隐性语言。性同意沟通似乎因性行为和关系状况而异。总体而言,SM男性和自认为是异性恋的人似乎在性同意的沟通上相似;然而,SM男性身上出现了一些新的线索。同意教育倡议在讨论性同意时应考虑来自更多样化人群的调查结果,以便对性健康教育采取更具包容性的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sexual consent cues among sexual minority men in the United States
ABSTRACT Sexual consent research often focuses on how those who identify as heterosexual communicate consent, with limited research examining how sexual minority (SM) men communicate consent. Factors that influence how people communicate consent – such as the type of sexual behaviour being consented to and the relationship status of those engaged in sexual behaviour – is understudied among SM men. The purpose of this exploratory study was to assess how SM men communicate sexual consent and examine if these factors influence how men consent to sex. SM men (N = 234) were recruited from social media and Qualtrics’ panel. Participants completed an open-ended survey assessing how consent was communicated during oral and anal sex and who their partner was during this encounter. Responses were analysed using an inductive coding approach. Six overarching consent cues emerged: Explicit Verbal, Explicit Nonverbal, No-Response, Implicit Nonverbal, Virtual Consent and Implicit Verbal. Sexual consent communication appeared to vary by sexual behaviour and relationship status. Overall, SM men and people who identify as heterosexual appear to communicate sexual consent similarly; however, some new cues emerged for SM men. Consent education initiatives should consider findings from more diverse populations when discussing sexual consent to take a more inclusive approach to sexual health education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology & Sexuality
Psychology & Sexuality PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Prospective Effects of Resilience on Mental Health among Sexual and Gender Minority Young People. The role of faith in the experience of grief among sexually diverse individuals: a systematic review Do attitude functions and perceiver demographics predict attitudes towards asexuality? Holding hands: LGBTQ people’s experiences of public displays of affection with their partner(s) Changing beliefs about gender: the relation between contact with gender nonconforming individuals and gender essentialism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1