CEA和Ca 19.9/肿瘤标志物在胃癌根治术后鉴别预后不良患者中的预后价值

L. Graziosi, E. Marino, A. Donini
{"title":"CEA和Ca 19.9/肿瘤标志物在胃癌根治术后鉴别预后不良患者中的预后价值","authors":"L. Graziosi, E. Marino, A. Donini","doi":"10.4172/1948-5956.1000529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Although gastric cancer incidence has decreased worldwide, it’ s still the fifth most frequent malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer related mortality. Many prognostic factors have been identified as indicators of gastric cancer prognosis including tumour size, depth, lymph nodes metastasis and microvascular involvement. To date the clinical significance of tumoral markers remains unclear. In our study we would like to investigate the prognostic survival significance of preoperative CEA and CA19.9.Material and Methods: From January 2004 to September 2016, a total of 326 gastric cancer patients were analysed. Of these 260 were enrolled in the study. The two serum tumour markers CEA and CA19.9 were detected within 7 days before surgery. The normal cut off value for serum CEA was 5 ng/ml whereas for CA19.9 was 35 U/ ml. Patients were also dichotomized according to CEA and CA19.9 median value (respectively 2 ng/ml and 9 U/ml).Results: Our results suggest that the optimal application of these common tumour markers could promote the clinical screening and staging of gastric cancer patients. Their evaluation is cheap and easy, allowing a routinely use to identify patients at high risk of death or post-surgical recurrences. Also, we could utilize the optimal cut-off value of CA19.9 for individualizing patients with an early stage but a very bad prognosis.Discussion and Conclusion: We conclude that the combined assessment of CA19.9 and CEA levels could have prognostic value in gastric cancer in particular to identify patients with a poor prognosis after radical surgery, who need an aggressive follow-up and medical treatment.","PeriodicalId":15170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy","volume":"117 4 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Value of CEA and Ca 19.9/Tumor Markers in Gastric Cancer to Identify Patients with Poor Prognosis after Radical Surgery\",\"authors\":\"L. Graziosi, E. Marino, A. Donini\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/1948-5956.1000529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Although gastric cancer incidence has decreased worldwide, it’ s still the fifth most frequent malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer related mortality. Many prognostic factors have been identified as indicators of gastric cancer prognosis including tumour size, depth, lymph nodes metastasis and microvascular involvement. To date the clinical significance of tumoral markers remains unclear. In our study we would like to investigate the prognostic survival significance of preoperative CEA and CA19.9.Material and Methods: From January 2004 to September 2016, a total of 326 gastric cancer patients were analysed. Of these 260 were enrolled in the study. The two serum tumour markers CEA and CA19.9 were detected within 7 days before surgery. The normal cut off value for serum CEA was 5 ng/ml whereas for CA19.9 was 35 U/ ml. Patients were also dichotomized according to CEA and CA19.9 median value (respectively 2 ng/ml and 9 U/ml).Results: Our results suggest that the optimal application of these common tumour markers could promote the clinical screening and staging of gastric cancer patients. Their evaluation is cheap and easy, allowing a routinely use to identify patients at high risk of death or post-surgical recurrences. Also, we could utilize the optimal cut-off value of CA19.9 for individualizing patients with an early stage but a very bad prognosis.Discussion and Conclusion: We conclude that the combined assessment of CA19.9 and CEA levels could have prognostic value in gastric cancer in particular to identify patients with a poor prognosis after radical surgery, who need an aggressive follow-up and medical treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"117 4 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5956.1000529\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5956.1000529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导论:虽然胃癌的发病率在世界范围内有所下降,但它仍然是第五大最常见的恶性肿瘤和第三大癌症相关死亡原因。许多预后因素已被确定为胃癌预后的指标,包括肿瘤大小、深度、淋巴结转移和微血管受累。迄今为止,肿瘤标志物的临床意义尚不清楚。在我们的研究中,我们想探讨术前CEA和CA19.9对预后生存的意义。材料与方法:对2004年1月至2016年9月共326例胃癌患者进行分析。其中260人参加了这项研究。术前7天检测血清肿瘤标志物CEA和CA19.9。血清CEA的正常临界值为5 ng/ml, CA19.9的正常临界值为35 U/ml,并根据CEA和CA19.9的中位数(分别为2 ng/ml和9 U/ml)对患者进行分类。结果:我们的研究结果表明,这些常见肿瘤标志物的优化应用可以促进胃癌患者的临床筛查和分期。它们的评估既便宜又容易,可以常规地用于识别死亡或术后复发风险高的患者。此外,我们可以利用CA19.9的最佳临界值对早期但预后很差的患者进行个体化治疗。讨论与结论:我们得出结论,CA19.9和CEA水平的联合评估在胃癌根治性手术后预后不良,需要积极随访和药物治疗的患者中具有预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic Value of CEA and Ca 19.9/Tumor Markers in Gastric Cancer to Identify Patients with Poor Prognosis after Radical Surgery
Introduction: Although gastric cancer incidence has decreased worldwide, it’ s still the fifth most frequent malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer related mortality. Many prognostic factors have been identified as indicators of gastric cancer prognosis including tumour size, depth, lymph nodes metastasis and microvascular involvement. To date the clinical significance of tumoral markers remains unclear. In our study we would like to investigate the prognostic survival significance of preoperative CEA and CA19.9.Material and Methods: From January 2004 to September 2016, a total of 326 gastric cancer patients were analysed. Of these 260 were enrolled in the study. The two serum tumour markers CEA and CA19.9 were detected within 7 days before surgery. The normal cut off value for serum CEA was 5 ng/ml whereas for CA19.9 was 35 U/ ml. Patients were also dichotomized according to CEA and CA19.9 median value (respectively 2 ng/ml and 9 U/ml).Results: Our results suggest that the optimal application of these common tumour markers could promote the clinical screening and staging of gastric cancer patients. Their evaluation is cheap and easy, allowing a routinely use to identify patients at high risk of death or post-surgical recurrences. Also, we could utilize the optimal cut-off value of CA19.9 for individualizing patients with an early stage but a very bad prognosis.Discussion and Conclusion: We conclude that the combined assessment of CA19.9 and CEA levels could have prognostic value in gastric cancer in particular to identify patients with a poor prognosis after radical surgery, who need an aggressive follow-up and medical treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Oxygen and Nitrogen Radicals in the Mechanism of Anticancer Drug Cytotoxicity. Durable Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade Plus Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel in Two Osimertinib-Refractory Patients with EGFR-mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma Significant Role of MCM10 in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Promote Viability and Migration Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy of Human Cancers FLOT1 is a novel target of ovarian cancer for diagnosis and treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1