两种硫酸盐对鲕状灰岩5种盐风化机制的排序

G. Kamh, C. Oguchi, K. Watanabe
{"title":"两种硫酸盐对鲕状灰岩5种盐风化机制的排序","authors":"G. Kamh, C. Oguchi, K. Watanabe","doi":"10.12900/rbm14.20.4-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The weathering of a given rock has been previously reported to be a result of many processes acting on it but one of them should dominate based on the prevailing environmental conditions at this site. In case of salt weathering, it has been reported to be prevailing and destructive for a wide range of materials but its regime has received little attention particularly ranking of salt weathering regimes on a given rock. Not only that but also the same salt differs in its impact on a given rock rather than other one based on the rock's properties and the acting weathering regime. The current study aims to compare and rank rock's damage by salts at five weathering regimes (that imitate all possible regimes in the world particularly in the Middle-East and Europe) using sodium and magnesium sulfates. The rock's pore size distribution \"PSD\" has been measured using mercury intrusion porosometry \"MIP\" before and after conducting the artificial weathering to find out rock's Salt Susceptibility Index \"SSI\" to be correlated with rock's damage visually recorded and numerically expressed by samples' weight loss at the end of each regime. The rock's weathering on micro-scale as well as salt's form and distribution have been investigated using scanning electron microscope \"SEM\" along profiles scanned on nano-scale from sample's surface to its deep inside. This is finally to rank weathering regimes on one hand and to rank the severity of these salts on the other hand. Also, to find out the rock's pore size that controls rock's susceptibility to salt weathering. This study enables a best choice for limits of rock properties in case of its use for reconstruction of archaeological sites at salty environments with regimes as that conducted in the current study. The results indicated that SCI-S15 is the most aggressive weathering regime, particularly with sodium sulfate, followed by CPI 12-12, particularly with sodium sulfate, but the least has been recorded for samples exposed to CPI, particularly with magnesium sulfate, CPI-CC, particularly with sodium sulfate, and CPI-HC, with both salts. Sodium sulfate is almost more destructive than magnesium sulfate for such rock but to have a clear view in ranking these two salts they must be applied for other facies in another study.","PeriodicalId":20957,"journal":{"name":"Restoration of Buildings and Monuments","volume":"45 1","pages":"247 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranking of Five Salt Weathering Regimes Conducted on Oolitic Limestone Using Two Sulfates\",\"authors\":\"G. Kamh, C. Oguchi, K. Watanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.12900/rbm14.20.4-0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The weathering of a given rock has been previously reported to be a result of many processes acting on it but one of them should dominate based on the prevailing environmental conditions at this site. In case of salt weathering, it has been reported to be prevailing and destructive for a wide range of materials but its regime has received little attention particularly ranking of salt weathering regimes on a given rock. Not only that but also the same salt differs in its impact on a given rock rather than other one based on the rock's properties and the acting weathering regime. The current study aims to compare and rank rock's damage by salts at five weathering regimes (that imitate all possible regimes in the world particularly in the Middle-East and Europe) using sodium and magnesium sulfates. The rock's pore size distribution \\\"PSD\\\" has been measured using mercury intrusion porosometry \\\"MIP\\\" before and after conducting the artificial weathering to find out rock's Salt Susceptibility Index \\\"SSI\\\" to be correlated with rock's damage visually recorded and numerically expressed by samples' weight loss at the end of each regime. The rock's weathering on micro-scale as well as salt's form and distribution have been investigated using scanning electron microscope \\\"SEM\\\" along profiles scanned on nano-scale from sample's surface to its deep inside. This is finally to rank weathering regimes on one hand and to rank the severity of these salts on the other hand. Also, to find out the rock's pore size that controls rock's susceptibility to salt weathering. This study enables a best choice for limits of rock properties in case of its use for reconstruction of archaeological sites at salty environments with regimes as that conducted in the current study. The results indicated that SCI-S15 is the most aggressive weathering regime, particularly with sodium sulfate, followed by CPI 12-12, particularly with sodium sulfate, but the least has been recorded for samples exposed to CPI, particularly with magnesium sulfate, CPI-CC, particularly with sodium sulfate, and CPI-HC, with both salts. Sodium sulfate is almost more destructive than magnesium sulfate for such rock but to have a clear view in ranking these two salts they must be applied for other facies in another study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Restoration of Buildings and Monuments\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"247 - 264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Restoration of Buildings and Monuments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12900/rbm14.20.4-0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration of Buildings and Monuments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12900/rbm14.20.4-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已知岩石的风化是由多种作用过程共同作用的结果,但根据该地点的主要环境条件,其中一种应占主导地位。在盐风化的情况下,据报道,它是普遍的和破坏性的材料范围很广,但它的状态很少受到关注,特别是在一个给定的岩石盐风化状态的排名。不仅如此,同一种盐对特定岩石的影响也会因岩石的性质和作用的风化机制而不同。目前的研究旨在比较和排列岩石在五种风化机制(模仿世界上所有可能的制度,特别是在中东和欧洲)中使用硫酸钠和硫酸镁的盐的损害。采用压汞孔隙测量法MIP测量了人工风化前后岩石的孔径分布“PSD”,得到了岩石的盐敏感性指数“SSI”与岩石损伤之间的关系,并以每一阶段结束时试样的失重量为数值表示。利用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对岩石的微观风化和盐的形态、分布进行了研究。最后一方面是对风化机制进行排序另一方面是对这些盐的严重程度进行排序。同时,找出控制岩石对盐风化敏感性的孔隙大小。这项研究为岩石性质的限制提供了最佳选择,以便在当前研究中进行的制度下用于咸水环境考古遗址的重建。结果表明,SCI-S15是最具侵蚀性的风化机制,特别是在硫酸钠下,其次是CPI 12-12,特别是在硫酸钠下,但暴露于CPI的样品中,特别是在硫酸镁下,CPI- cc,特别是在硫酸钠下,CPI- hc,两种盐下,记录的风化机制最少。对于这类岩石,硫酸钠几乎比硫酸镁更具破坏性,但为了对这两种盐进行明确的排序,必须在另一项研究中将它们应用于其他相。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ranking of Five Salt Weathering Regimes Conducted on Oolitic Limestone Using Two Sulfates
The weathering of a given rock has been previously reported to be a result of many processes acting on it but one of them should dominate based on the prevailing environmental conditions at this site. In case of salt weathering, it has been reported to be prevailing and destructive for a wide range of materials but its regime has received little attention particularly ranking of salt weathering regimes on a given rock. Not only that but also the same salt differs in its impact on a given rock rather than other one based on the rock's properties and the acting weathering regime. The current study aims to compare and rank rock's damage by salts at five weathering regimes (that imitate all possible regimes in the world particularly in the Middle-East and Europe) using sodium and magnesium sulfates. The rock's pore size distribution "PSD" has been measured using mercury intrusion porosometry "MIP" before and after conducting the artificial weathering to find out rock's Salt Susceptibility Index "SSI" to be correlated with rock's damage visually recorded and numerically expressed by samples' weight loss at the end of each regime. The rock's weathering on micro-scale as well as salt's form and distribution have been investigated using scanning electron microscope "SEM" along profiles scanned on nano-scale from sample's surface to its deep inside. This is finally to rank weathering regimes on one hand and to rank the severity of these salts on the other hand. Also, to find out the rock's pore size that controls rock's susceptibility to salt weathering. This study enables a best choice for limits of rock properties in case of its use for reconstruction of archaeological sites at salty environments with regimes as that conducted in the current study. The results indicated that SCI-S15 is the most aggressive weathering regime, particularly with sodium sulfate, followed by CPI 12-12, particularly with sodium sulfate, but the least has been recorded for samples exposed to CPI, particularly with magnesium sulfate, CPI-CC, particularly with sodium sulfate, and CPI-HC, with both salts. Sodium sulfate is almost more destructive than magnesium sulfate for such rock but to have a clear view in ranking these two salts they must be applied for other facies in another study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantitative Analysis of Historic Mortars by Digital Image Analysis of Thin Sections Twelve Years of Energy Efficiency in Historic Buildings in Sweden Valuation of Medieval Churches; Taking Account of Laypersons’ Views Building Performance Evaluation – A Design Approach for Refurbishment of a Small Traditional Building in Scotland Guidance for Finding a Sustainable Balance between Energy Savings and Heritage Preservation When Retrofitting Heritage Buildings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1