ONCObc-ST:一种改进的基于选择与测试(ST)算法的乳腺癌诊断临床推理算法

O. N. Oyelade, S. Adewuyi
{"title":"ONCObc-ST:一种改进的基于选择与测试(ST)算法的乳腺癌诊断临床推理算法","authors":"O. N. Oyelade, S. Adewuyi","doi":"10.3844/AJBSP.2019.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need for an accurate reasoning algorithm is usually necessitated by the sensitivity of domain of (medicine as example) application of such algorithms. Most reasoning algorithms for medical diagnosis are either limited by their techniques or accuracy and efficiency. Even the Select and Test (ST) algorithm which is considered a more approximate reasoning algorithm is also limited by its approach of using bipartite graph in modeling domain knowledge and making inference through the use of orthogonal vector projection for estimating likelihood of diagnosis at the clinical decision stage (induction). While the bipartite graph knowledge base lacks n-ary use of predicate on concepts, orthogonal vector projection on the other hand has high computation for the inference process. The aim of this paper is to enhance ST algorithm for improved performance and accuracy. First, we propose the use of ontologies and semantic web based rule for knowledge representation so as to provide support for inference making. Furthermore, three major improvements were added to ST algorithm to aid the improvement of its approximation. Secondly, we designed an inference making procedure to enable interaction with the knowledge base mentioned earlier. Thirdly, we model Hill’s Criteria of Causation into clinical decision stage of ST to overcome the limitation of orthogonal vector projection. Lastly, the improved ST algorithm was largely represented and described using set notations (though implemented as linked-list and queues) and mathematical notations. The result of the improved ST algorithm revealed a sensitivity of 0.81 and 0.89 and specificity of 0.82 and 1.0 in the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database (WBCD) and Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) datasets respectively. In addition, the accuracy obtained from the proposed algorithm was 86.0% and 88.72% for the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database (WBCD) and Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) datasets respectively. This enhancement in accuracy was obtained at a slowdown time due to the reasoning process and ontology parsing task added to the enhanced system. However, there was an improvement in the accuracy and inference power of the resulting system.","PeriodicalId":11025,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Bioinformatics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ONCObc-ST: An Improved Clinical Reasoning Algorithm Based on Select and Test (ST) Algorithm for Diagnosing Breast Cancer\",\"authors\":\"O. N. Oyelade, S. Adewuyi\",\"doi\":\"10.3844/AJBSP.2019.1.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The need for an accurate reasoning algorithm is usually necessitated by the sensitivity of domain of (medicine as example) application of such algorithms. Most reasoning algorithms for medical diagnosis are either limited by their techniques or accuracy and efficiency. Even the Select and Test (ST) algorithm which is considered a more approximate reasoning algorithm is also limited by its approach of using bipartite graph in modeling domain knowledge and making inference through the use of orthogonal vector projection for estimating likelihood of diagnosis at the clinical decision stage (induction). While the bipartite graph knowledge base lacks n-ary use of predicate on concepts, orthogonal vector projection on the other hand has high computation for the inference process. The aim of this paper is to enhance ST algorithm for improved performance and accuracy. First, we propose the use of ontologies and semantic web based rule for knowledge representation so as to provide support for inference making. Furthermore, three major improvements were added to ST algorithm to aid the improvement of its approximation. Secondly, we designed an inference making procedure to enable interaction with the knowledge base mentioned earlier. Thirdly, we model Hill’s Criteria of Causation into clinical decision stage of ST to overcome the limitation of orthogonal vector projection. Lastly, the improved ST algorithm was largely represented and described using set notations (though implemented as linked-list and queues) and mathematical notations. The result of the improved ST algorithm revealed a sensitivity of 0.81 and 0.89 and specificity of 0.82 and 1.0 in the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database (WBCD) and Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) datasets respectively. In addition, the accuracy obtained from the proposed algorithm was 86.0% and 88.72% for the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database (WBCD) and Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) datasets respectively. This enhancement in accuracy was obtained at a slowdown time due to the reasoning process and ontology parsing task added to the enhanced system. However, there was an improvement in the accuracy and inference power of the resulting system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Research in Bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Research in Bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3844/AJBSP.2019.1.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3844/AJBSP.2019.1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

由于应用这种算法的领域(如医学)的敏感性,通常需要一种准确的推理算法。大多数医学诊断推理算法要么受到技术限制,要么受到准确性和效率的限制。即使是被认为是一种更近似的推理算法的选择和测试(ST)算法也受到其使用二部图建模领域知识和通过使用正交向量投影进行推理的方法的限制,以估计临床决策阶段(归纳)的诊断可能性。二部图知识库在概念上缺乏n元谓词的使用,而正交向量投影在推理过程中具有较高的计算量。本文的目的是为了提高ST算法的性能和准确性。首先,我们提出使用本体和基于语义web的规则进行知识表示,为推理提供支持。此外,本文还对ST算法进行了三个主要改进,以帮助改进其近似性。其次,我们设计了一个推理过程来实现与前面提到的知识库的交互。再次,我们将Hill’s因果准则模型引入ST的临床决策阶段,以克服正交向量投影的局限性。最后,改进的ST算法主要使用集合表示法(尽管实现为链表和队列)和数学表示法来表示和描述。改进后的ST算法在Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database (WBCD)和Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC)数据集中的敏感性分别为0.81和0.89,特异性分别为0.82和1.0。此外,该算法在Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database (WBCD)和Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC)数据集上的准确率分别为86.0%和88.72%。由于在增强的系统中添加了推理过程和本体解析任务,因此在较慢的时间内获得了准确性的提高。然而,结果系统的准确性和推理能力有了提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ONCObc-ST: An Improved Clinical Reasoning Algorithm Based on Select and Test (ST) Algorithm for Diagnosing Breast Cancer
The need for an accurate reasoning algorithm is usually necessitated by the sensitivity of domain of (medicine as example) application of such algorithms. Most reasoning algorithms for medical diagnosis are either limited by their techniques or accuracy and efficiency. Even the Select and Test (ST) algorithm which is considered a more approximate reasoning algorithm is also limited by its approach of using bipartite graph in modeling domain knowledge and making inference through the use of orthogonal vector projection for estimating likelihood of diagnosis at the clinical decision stage (induction). While the bipartite graph knowledge base lacks n-ary use of predicate on concepts, orthogonal vector projection on the other hand has high computation for the inference process. The aim of this paper is to enhance ST algorithm for improved performance and accuracy. First, we propose the use of ontologies and semantic web based rule for knowledge representation so as to provide support for inference making. Furthermore, three major improvements were added to ST algorithm to aid the improvement of its approximation. Secondly, we designed an inference making procedure to enable interaction with the knowledge base mentioned earlier. Thirdly, we model Hill’s Criteria of Causation into clinical decision stage of ST to overcome the limitation of orthogonal vector projection. Lastly, the improved ST algorithm was largely represented and described using set notations (though implemented as linked-list and queues) and mathematical notations. The result of the improved ST algorithm revealed a sensitivity of 0.81 and 0.89 and specificity of 0.82 and 1.0 in the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database (WBCD) and Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) datasets respectively. In addition, the accuracy obtained from the proposed algorithm was 86.0% and 88.72% for the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database (WBCD) and Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) datasets respectively. This enhancement in accuracy was obtained at a slowdown time due to the reasoning process and ontology parsing task added to the enhanced system. However, there was an improvement in the accuracy and inference power of the resulting system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Highlight of New Phosphodiesterase 10A Inhibitors Using Molecular Docking The Relevance of Bioinformatic Tools in the Study of Polymorphisms of the B4GALNT2 Gene and its Association with Cancer The Development of New Molecules Having Antiemetic Activity Using Molecular Modeling Diversity of Culturable Halophilic Archaea and Bacteria from Chott Tinsilt and El Malah Salt-Lake in Algeria Phylogeny and Molecular Study of Some Entomopathogenic Rhizobacteria Isolated from Two Regions in Algeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1