基于人工智能的人工耳蜗选择评分系统

IF 0.3 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Hearing Balance and Communication Pub Date : 2023-01-16 DOI:10.1080/21695717.2023.2165371
A. Abousetta, Wafaa El Kholy, M. Hegazy, E. Kolkaila, A. Emara, Shaymaa A. Serag, Ahmed Salah Fathalla, Omnia Ismail
{"title":"基于人工智能的人工耳蜗选择评分系统","authors":"A. Abousetta, Wafaa El Kholy, M. Hegazy, E. Kolkaila, A. Emara, Shaymaa A. Serag, Ahmed Salah Fathalla, Omnia Ismail","doi":"10.1080/21695717.2023.2165371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: Cochlear implant (CI) candidate selection is a lengthy, complicated process that entails subjective judgment on the interaction of multiple pre-operative variables. It is assumed that setting a scoring system for the process of CI candidate selection would help in precise and reliable decision making. This would also provide a tool that would help in providing a better quality of life for CI patients. Methods: Retrospective cohort study was held out in three post-CI rehabilitation centers. A total of 100 children records were analyzed with two statistical methods; conventional and Artificial Intelligence (AI) using Machine Learning. Language age deficit, phonological deficit, and social deficit were invented as new measures of CI performance; used to represent the developmental delay of those children in a single numeric value (in months). Results: Artificial Intelligence analysis surpassed conventional statistical methods for the prediction of the outcome measures of post-CI performance. This was clearly expressed using linear regression models. The AI classification model validation for predictive accuracy of language age deficit, phonological deficit, and social deficit were 56.66%, 88.11%, and 40.46% respectively. Conclusion: The production of a preliminary CI scoring model used for prediction of performance of patients was achieved. More data should be collected and fed to the software in order to improve its performance.","PeriodicalId":43765,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Balance and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoring system for cochlear implant candidate selection using artificial intelligence\",\"authors\":\"A. Abousetta, Wafaa El Kholy, M. Hegazy, E. Kolkaila, A. Emara, Shaymaa A. Serag, Ahmed Salah Fathalla, Omnia Ismail\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21695717.2023.2165371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective: Cochlear implant (CI) candidate selection is a lengthy, complicated process that entails subjective judgment on the interaction of multiple pre-operative variables. It is assumed that setting a scoring system for the process of CI candidate selection would help in precise and reliable decision making. This would also provide a tool that would help in providing a better quality of life for CI patients. Methods: Retrospective cohort study was held out in three post-CI rehabilitation centers. A total of 100 children records were analyzed with two statistical methods; conventional and Artificial Intelligence (AI) using Machine Learning. Language age deficit, phonological deficit, and social deficit were invented as new measures of CI performance; used to represent the developmental delay of those children in a single numeric value (in months). Results: Artificial Intelligence analysis surpassed conventional statistical methods for the prediction of the outcome measures of post-CI performance. This was clearly expressed using linear regression models. The AI classification model validation for predictive accuracy of language age deficit, phonological deficit, and social deficit were 56.66%, 88.11%, and 40.46% respectively. Conclusion: The production of a preliminary CI scoring model used for prediction of performance of patients was achieved. More data should be collected and fed to the software in order to improve its performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Balance and Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Balance and Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2023.2165371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Balance and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2023.2165371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:人工耳蜗(CI)的选择是一个漫长而复杂的过程,需要对多个术前变量的相互作用进行主观判断。假设在CI候选人选择过程中设置一个评分系统将有助于准确可靠的决策。这也将提供一种工具,有助于为CI患者提供更好的生活质量。方法:回顾性队列研究在三家ci后康复中心进行。采用两种统计方法对100例患儿病历进行分析;传统智能和人工智能(AI)使用机器学习。语言年龄缺陷、语音缺陷和社交缺陷被发明作为CI表现的新指标;用于用单个数值(以月为单位)表示这些儿童的发育延迟。结果:人工智能分析在预测ci后表现的结局指标方面优于传统的统计方法。使用线性回归模型清楚地表达了这一点。人工智能分类模型对语言年龄缺陷、语音缺陷和社交缺陷的预测准确率分别为56.66%、88.11%和40.46%。结论:初步的CI评分模型用于预测患者的表现是成功的。为了提高软件的性能,应该收集更多的数据并将其输入软件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A scoring system for cochlear implant candidate selection using artificial intelligence
Abstract Objective: Cochlear implant (CI) candidate selection is a lengthy, complicated process that entails subjective judgment on the interaction of multiple pre-operative variables. It is assumed that setting a scoring system for the process of CI candidate selection would help in precise and reliable decision making. This would also provide a tool that would help in providing a better quality of life for CI patients. Methods: Retrospective cohort study was held out in three post-CI rehabilitation centers. A total of 100 children records were analyzed with two statistical methods; conventional and Artificial Intelligence (AI) using Machine Learning. Language age deficit, phonological deficit, and social deficit were invented as new measures of CI performance; used to represent the developmental delay of those children in a single numeric value (in months). Results: Artificial Intelligence analysis surpassed conventional statistical methods for the prediction of the outcome measures of post-CI performance. This was clearly expressed using linear regression models. The AI classification model validation for predictive accuracy of language age deficit, phonological deficit, and social deficit were 56.66%, 88.11%, and 40.46% respectively. Conclusion: The production of a preliminary CI scoring model used for prediction of performance of patients was achieved. More data should be collected and fed to the software in order to improve its performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Balance and Communication
Hearing Balance and Communication AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Comparison of quick speech-in-noise test and pure tone audiometry in noise-induced hearing loss Otolin-1 as a biomarker for the evaluation of the effectiveness of betahistine treatment for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo The effect of hearing loss on balance in subjects with cognitive disorders Effect of auditory deprivation on threshold of sound lateralization Assessment of spatial acuity in typically developing children: a comparative study of sound-field and closed-field sound source identification paradigms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1