在吊带蛇气道氨否定正常通气反应气道二氧化碳

Marcos Vivoni, Maria I Castro , Liliana Lojo, Robert A Furilla
{"title":"在吊带蛇气道氨否定正常通气反应气道二氧化碳","authors":"Marcos Vivoni,&nbsp;Maria I Castro ,&nbsp;Liliana Lojo,&nbsp;Robert A Furilla","doi":"10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00216-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Earlier studies from this lab showed that unidirectionally ventilated snakes, maintained on high airway [CO<sub>2</sub>], breathe slowly with a large tidal volume. If airway [CO<sub>2</sub>] is abruptly reduced during inspiration, inspiratory duration (<span>ti</span>) and tidal volume increase. On the other hand, in an animal normally receiving fresh air (no CO<sub>2</sub> in the inspired air) on each inspiration, if fresh air is withheld for one breath, <span>ti</span> and tidal volume decrease. To test the effect of producing an alkaline environment in the presence of CO<sub>2</sub> during these two maneuvers, six unidirectionally ventilated snakes weighing 32±16 g were maintained on 4% CO<sub>2</sub> in air flowing at 300 ml/min even during inspiration. NH<sub>3</sub> (4%) was introduced into the lung during one inspiration. During that breath, <span>ti</span> increased significantly, as if CO<sub>2</sub> had been removed from the lung. In another study, six different snakes weighing 21±6 g received fresh air at each inspiration. At the end of inspiration [CO<sub>2</sub>] was again raised to 4%. However, for one breath, [CO<sub>2</sub>] was maintained high during inspiration and airway NH<sub>3</sub> (3–4%) was simultaneously introduced into the airstream. During this breath, <span>ti</span> was expected to decrease, owing to the elevated [CO<sub>2</sub>]; however, there was no significant difference in the <span>ti</span> of the test breath compared with the previous breath, indicating that ammonia interfered with the expected CO<sub>2</sub> response. This study suggests that pH (probably intracellular) rather than P<sub>CO<sub>2</sub></sub> produces this ventilatory reflex.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20976,"journal":{"name":"Respiration physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00216-X","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Airway ammonia negates the normal ventilatory response to airway CO2 in garter snakes\",\"authors\":\"Marcos Vivoni,&nbsp;Maria I Castro ,&nbsp;Liliana Lojo,&nbsp;Robert A Furilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00216-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Earlier studies from this lab showed that unidirectionally ventilated snakes, maintained on high airway [CO<sub>2</sub>], breathe slowly with a large tidal volume. If airway [CO<sub>2</sub>] is abruptly reduced during inspiration, inspiratory duration (<span>ti</span>) and tidal volume increase. On the other hand, in an animal normally receiving fresh air (no CO<sub>2</sub> in the inspired air) on each inspiration, if fresh air is withheld for one breath, <span>ti</span> and tidal volume decrease. To test the effect of producing an alkaline environment in the presence of CO<sub>2</sub> during these two maneuvers, six unidirectionally ventilated snakes weighing 32±16 g were maintained on 4% CO<sub>2</sub> in air flowing at 300 ml/min even during inspiration. NH<sub>3</sub> (4%) was introduced into the lung during one inspiration. During that breath, <span>ti</span> increased significantly, as if CO<sub>2</sub> had been removed from the lung. In another study, six different snakes weighing 21±6 g received fresh air at each inspiration. At the end of inspiration [CO<sub>2</sub>] was again raised to 4%. However, for one breath, [CO<sub>2</sub>] was maintained high during inspiration and airway NH<sub>3</sub> (3–4%) was simultaneously introduced into the airstream. During this breath, <span>ti</span> was expected to decrease, owing to the elevated [CO<sub>2</sub>]; however, there was no significant difference in the <span>ti</span> of the test breath compared with the previous breath, indicating that ammonia interfered with the expected CO<sub>2</sub> response. This study suggests that pH (probably intracellular) rather than P<sub>CO<sub>2</sub></sub> produces this ventilatory reflex.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiration physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00216-X\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiration physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003456870100216X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003456870100216X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

该实验室早期的研究表明,单向通风的蛇,保持高气道[CO2],呼吸缓慢,潮汐量大。如果吸气时气道[CO2]突然减少,吸气时间(ti)和潮气量增加。另一方面,在每次吸气时通常接受新鲜空气(吸入空气中没有二氧化碳)的动物中,如果在一次呼吸中保留新鲜空气,则ti和潮气量会减少。为了测试在有CO2存在的情况下产生碱性环境的效果,6条体重为32±16 g的单向通风蛇在吸入过程中保持在300 ml/min流速为4% CO2的空气中。NH3(4%)一次吸入肺内。在这一次呼吸中,ti显著增加,就好像二氧化碳从肺中被清除了一样。在另一项研究中,6条体重为21±6克的蛇在每次吸气时都能吸入新鲜空气。在灵感结束时,[CO2]再次提高到4%。然而,对于一次呼吸,[CO2]在吸气过程中保持高水平,同时将气道NH3(3-4%)引入气流。在这一次呼吸中,由于升高的[CO2], ti预计会下降;然而,与前一次呼吸相比,测试呼吸的ti没有显著差异,这表明氨干扰了预期的CO2响应。这项研究表明,产生这种通气反射的是pH值(可能是细胞内的)而不是二氧化碳分压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Airway ammonia negates the normal ventilatory response to airway CO2 in garter snakes

Earlier studies from this lab showed that unidirectionally ventilated snakes, maintained on high airway [CO2], breathe slowly with a large tidal volume. If airway [CO2] is abruptly reduced during inspiration, inspiratory duration (ti) and tidal volume increase. On the other hand, in an animal normally receiving fresh air (no CO2 in the inspired air) on each inspiration, if fresh air is withheld for one breath, ti and tidal volume decrease. To test the effect of producing an alkaline environment in the presence of CO2 during these two maneuvers, six unidirectionally ventilated snakes weighing 32±16 g were maintained on 4% CO2 in air flowing at 300 ml/min even during inspiration. NH3 (4%) was introduced into the lung during one inspiration. During that breath, ti increased significantly, as if CO2 had been removed from the lung. In another study, six different snakes weighing 21±6 g received fresh air at each inspiration. At the end of inspiration [CO2] was again raised to 4%. However, for one breath, [CO2] was maintained high during inspiration and airway NH3 (3–4%) was simultaneously introduced into the airstream. During this breath, ti was expected to decrease, owing to the elevated [CO2]; however, there was no significant difference in the ti of the test breath compared with the previous breath, indicating that ammonia interfered with the expected CO2 response. This study suggests that pH (probably intracellular) rather than PCO2 produces this ventilatory reflex.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of regional changes to shell conductance on oxygen consumption and growth of chicken embryos Metabolic and ventilatory responses to CO hypoxia at different levels of oxygenation in the rat Brain electrical activity during combined hypoxemia and hypoperfusion in anesthetized rats Comparison between anatomy and resistance of upper airway in normal subjects, snorers and OSAS patients Eicosanoids modulate hyperpnea-induced late phase airway obstruction and hyperreactivity in dogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1