Mónica Torres-Cajas, Adriana Lara-Velarde, Danilo Yépez-Oviedo, E. Heredia-Arboleda
{"title":"高等教育教师共同评价过程","authors":"Mónica Torres-Cajas, Adriana Lara-Velarde, Danilo Yépez-Oviedo, E. Heredia-Arboleda","doi":"10.29393/atat523-425mttc40425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Th e students’ learning results are closely related to the quality of teachers. Consequently, teaching practice implies a continuous search of the results it produces. Th e quality education policies in higher education institutions should be directed to transform the culture of performance evaluation into peer evaluation; trying to over-come the resistance it generates in many educational environments, especially those that are not linked to this culture. Th is bibliographic research aims to develop a dis-cussion about a process of co-evaluation to favor the improvement of the teacher and the educational institution, through a practical four-stage process: Pre Observation, Observation, Post Observation and Critical Refection that encourages new ways to facilitate knowledge. desarrollar una discusión sobre un proceso de co-evaluación para favorecer la mejora del profesor y la institución educativa. A través de un proceso práctico de cuatro etapas: Pre Observación, Observación, Post Observación y Refexión Crítica que aliente nuevas formas de facilitar el conocimiento.","PeriodicalId":8621,"journal":{"name":"Atenea (Concepción)","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teacher Coassessment Process in Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"Mónica Torres-Cajas, Adriana Lara-Velarde, Danilo Yépez-Oviedo, E. Heredia-Arboleda\",\"doi\":\"10.29393/atat523-425mttc40425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Th e students’ learning results are closely related to the quality of teachers. Consequently, teaching practice implies a continuous search of the results it produces. Th e quality education policies in higher education institutions should be directed to transform the culture of performance evaluation into peer evaluation; trying to over-come the resistance it generates in many educational environments, especially those that are not linked to this culture. Th is bibliographic research aims to develop a dis-cussion about a process of co-evaluation to favor the improvement of the teacher and the educational institution, through a practical four-stage process: Pre Observation, Observation, Post Observation and Critical Refection that encourages new ways to facilitate knowledge. desarrollar una discusión sobre un proceso de co-evaluación para favorecer la mejora del profesor y la institución educativa. A través de un proceso práctico de cuatro etapas: Pre Observación, Observación, Post Observación y Refexión Crítica que aliente nuevas formas de facilitar el conocimiento.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atenea (Concepción)\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atenea (Concepción)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29393/atat523-425mttc40425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atenea (Concepción)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29393/atat523-425mttc40425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
学生的学习效果与教师的素质密切相关。。因此,教学实践意味着对其产生的结果的不断探索。高校素质教育政策应引导绩效评价文化向同行评价文化转变;试图克服它在许多教育环境中产生的阻力,特别是那些与这种文化没有联系的环境。本文的书目研究旨在通过一个实用的四阶段过程:前观察、观察、后观察和批判性反思,鼓励新的方法来促进知识的发展,从而探讨一个有利于教师和教育机构改进的共同评估过程。通过institución教育,通过co-evaluación对教授的荣誉给予支持的联合国进程。1 .在处理过程中通过电子邮件和电子邮件práctico:前Observación、Observación、后Observación和Refexión Crítica que aliente nuevas formas de facilitar conconimiento。
: Th e students’ learning results are closely related to the quality of teachers. Consequently, teaching practice implies a continuous search of the results it produces. Th e quality education policies in higher education institutions should be directed to transform the culture of performance evaluation into peer evaluation; trying to over-come the resistance it generates in many educational environments, especially those that are not linked to this culture. Th is bibliographic research aims to develop a dis-cussion about a process of co-evaluation to favor the improvement of the teacher and the educational institution, through a practical four-stage process: Pre Observation, Observation, Post Observation and Critical Refection that encourages new ways to facilitate knowledge. desarrollar una discusión sobre un proceso de co-evaluación para favorecer la mejora del profesor y la institución educativa. A través de un proceso práctico de cuatro etapas: Pre Observación, Observación, Post Observación y Refexión Crítica que aliente nuevas formas de facilitar el conocimiento.