{"title":"《奥德赛》(20.356-57)和公元前1178年的日食:对拜库齐斯和马格纳斯科的回应","authors":"Peter Gainsford","doi":"10.1353/APA.2012.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent argument of Constantino Baikouzis and Marcelo Magnasco that Odyssey 20.356–57 preserves a reference to the solar eclipse of 26 April 1178 b.c.e . has received widespread attention in generalist publications. Unlike Carl Schoch’s 1926 argument, which came to the same conclusion,the new argument cannot be dismissed on the basis of the passage’s context. Baikouzis and Magnasco require several other tacit assumptions, however, and many of these may be rejected with great confidence.","PeriodicalId":46223,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the American Philological Association","volume":"36 1","pages":"1 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Odyssey 20.356-57 and the Eclipse of 1178 b.c.e .: A Response to Baikouzis and Magnasco\",\"authors\":\"Peter Gainsford\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/APA.2012.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent argument of Constantino Baikouzis and Marcelo Magnasco that Odyssey 20.356–57 preserves a reference to the solar eclipse of 26 April 1178 b.c.e . has received widespread attention in generalist publications. Unlike Carl Schoch’s 1926 argument, which came to the same conclusion,the new argument cannot be dismissed on the basis of the passage’s context. Baikouzis and Magnasco require several other tacit assumptions, however, and many of these may be rejected with great confidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the American Philological Association\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the American Philological Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/APA.2012.0006\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the American Philological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/APA.2012.0006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Odyssey 20.356-57 and the Eclipse of 1178 b.c.e .: A Response to Baikouzis and Magnasco
The recent argument of Constantino Baikouzis and Marcelo Magnasco that Odyssey 20.356–57 preserves a reference to the solar eclipse of 26 April 1178 b.c.e . has received widespread attention in generalist publications. Unlike Carl Schoch’s 1926 argument, which came to the same conclusion,the new argument cannot be dismissed on the basis of the passage’s context. Baikouzis and Magnasco require several other tacit assumptions, however, and many of these may be rejected with great confidence.
期刊介绍：
Transactions of the APA (TAPA) is the official research publication of the American Philological Association. TAPA reflects the wide range and high quality of research currently undertaken by classicists. Highlights of every issue include: The Presidential Address from the previous year"s conference and Paragraphoi a reflection on the material and response to issues raised in the issue.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
