{"title":"衡量波动性持久性和指数再平衡的不对称效应","authors":"Eshan Ahluwalia, Trilochan Tripathy, A. Mishra","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v15n5p86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the time-varying volatility behavior of the stocks that are added to or deleted from the major indices (Nifty 50 and Nifty Next 50) of the National Stock Exchange of India around the event of index rebalancing. The best fit asymmetric panel GJR-GARCH model estimates suggest that volatility persistence is relatively higher for the stocks added to a prominent benchmark index compared to the stocks deleted from such an index. On the contrary, the stocks deleted from a prominent benchmark index are exposed to a higher degree of volatility asymmetry than the stocks added. Our findings have implications on traders, asset managers, exchange managers, regulators and analysts.","PeriodicalId":37166,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Volatility Persistence and Asymmetric Effects Around Index Rebalancing of Nifty Indices\",\"authors\":\"Eshan Ahluwalia, Trilochan Tripathy, A. Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/ijef.v15n5p86\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the time-varying volatility behavior of the stocks that are added to or deleted from the major indices (Nifty 50 and Nifty Next 50) of the National Stock Exchange of India around the event of index rebalancing. The best fit asymmetric panel GJR-GARCH model estimates suggest that volatility persistence is relatively higher for the stocks added to a prominent benchmark index compared to the stocks deleted from such an index. On the contrary, the stocks deleted from a prominent benchmark index are exposed to a higher degree of volatility asymmetry than the stocks added. Our findings have implications on traders, asset managers, exchange managers, regulators and analysts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v15n5p86\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v15n5p86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文研究了在指数再平衡事件前后,印度国家证券交易所主要指数(Nifty 50和Nifty Next 50)的增减股票的时变波动行为。最佳拟合非对称面板GJR-GARCH模型估计表明,与从该指数中删除的股票相比,被添加到突出基准指数的股票的波动性持久性相对较高。相反,从一个重要基准指数中剔除的股票,其波动性不对称程度要高于被纳入指数的股票。我们的研究结果对交易员、资产管理公司、交易所管理公司、监管机构和分析师都有启示意义。
Measuring Volatility Persistence and Asymmetric Effects Around Index Rebalancing of Nifty Indices
This paper examines the time-varying volatility behavior of the stocks that are added to or deleted from the major indices (Nifty 50 and Nifty Next 50) of the National Stock Exchange of India around the event of index rebalancing. The best fit asymmetric panel GJR-GARCH model estimates suggest that volatility persistence is relatively higher for the stocks added to a prominent benchmark index compared to the stocks deleted from such an index. On the contrary, the stocks deleted from a prominent benchmark index are exposed to a higher degree of volatility asymmetry than the stocks added. Our findings have implications on traders, asset managers, exchange managers, regulators and analysts.