{"title":"员工愤怒是一种内部风险吗?数字通信中消极情绪与内部风险的检测和测量——人类评价者与心理语言学软件的比较","authors":"E. Shaw, Maria Payri, Ilene Shaw","doi":"10.15394/JDFSL.2013.1144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research uses two recently introduced observer rating scales, (Shaw et al., 2013) for the identification and measurement of negative sentiment (the Scale for Negativity in Text or SNIT) and insider risk (Scale of Indicators of Risk in Digital Communication or SIRDC) in communications to test the performance of psycholinguistic software designed to detect indicators of these risk factors. The psycholinguistic software program, WarmTouch (WT), previously used for investigations, appeared to be an effective means for locating communications scored High or Medium in negative sentiment by the SNIT or High in insider risk by the SIRDC within a randomly selected sample from the Enron archive. WT proved less effective in locating emails Low in negative sentiment on the SNIT and Low in insider risk on the SIRDC. However, WT performed extremely well in identifying communications from actual insiders randomly selected from case files and inserted in this email sample. In addition, it appeared that WT’s measure of perceived Victimization was a significant supplement to using negative sentiment alone, when it came to searching for actual insiders. Previous findings ( Shaw et al., 2013) indicate that this relative weakness in identifying low levels of negative sentiment may not impair WT’s usefulness for identifying communications containing","PeriodicalId":43224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HOW OFTEN IS EMPLOYEE ANGER AN INSIDER RISK II? DETECTING AND MEASURING NEGATIVE SENTIMENT VERSUS INSIDER RISK IN DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS-COMPARISON BETWEEN HUMAN RATERS AND PSYCHOLINGUISTIC SOFTWARE\",\"authors\":\"E. Shaw, Maria Payri, Ilene Shaw\",\"doi\":\"10.15394/JDFSL.2013.1144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research uses two recently introduced observer rating scales, (Shaw et al., 2013) for the identification and measurement of negative sentiment (the Scale for Negativity in Text or SNIT) and insider risk (Scale of Indicators of Risk in Digital Communication or SIRDC) in communications to test the performance of psycholinguistic software designed to detect indicators of these risk factors. The psycholinguistic software program, WarmTouch (WT), previously used for investigations, appeared to be an effective means for locating communications scored High or Medium in negative sentiment by the SNIT or High in insider risk by the SIRDC within a randomly selected sample from the Enron archive. WT proved less effective in locating emails Low in negative sentiment on the SNIT and Low in insider risk on the SIRDC. However, WT performed extremely well in identifying communications from actual insiders randomly selected from case files and inserted in this email sample. In addition, it appeared that WT’s measure of perceived Victimization was a significant supplement to using negative sentiment alone, when it came to searching for actual insiders. Previous findings ( Shaw et al., 2013) indicate that this relative weakness in identifying low levels of negative sentiment may not impair WT’s usefulness for identifying communications containing\",\"PeriodicalId\":43224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15394/JDFSL.2013.1144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15394/JDFSL.2013.1144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本研究使用两种最近引入的观察者评级量表(Shaw et al., 2013)来识别和测量负面情绪(文本中的消极情绪量表或SNIT)和内部风险(数字通信中的风险指标量表或SIRDC),以测试用于检测这些风险因素指标的心理语言学软件的性能。以前用于调查的心理语言学软件程序WarmTouch (WT)似乎是一种有效的方法,可以在随机选择的安然档案样本中定位由SNIT评为负面情绪高或中等或由SIRDC评为内幕风险高的通信。WT证明在定位电子邮件方面效果较差,SNIT的负面情绪较低,SIRDC的内部风险较低。然而,WT在识别从案例文件中随机选择并插入此电子邮件样本的实际内部人员的通信方面表现得非常好。此外,当涉及到寻找实际的内部人员时,WT的感知受害测量似乎是单独使用负面情绪的重要补充。先前的研究结果(Shaw et al., 2013)表明,识别低水平负面情绪的相对弱点可能不会损害WT在识别包含的通信中的有用性
HOW OFTEN IS EMPLOYEE ANGER AN INSIDER RISK II? DETECTING AND MEASURING NEGATIVE SENTIMENT VERSUS INSIDER RISK IN DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS-COMPARISON BETWEEN HUMAN RATERS AND PSYCHOLINGUISTIC SOFTWARE
This research uses two recently introduced observer rating scales, (Shaw et al., 2013) for the identification and measurement of negative sentiment (the Scale for Negativity in Text or SNIT) and insider risk (Scale of Indicators of Risk in Digital Communication or SIRDC) in communications to test the performance of psycholinguistic software designed to detect indicators of these risk factors. The psycholinguistic software program, WarmTouch (WT), previously used for investigations, appeared to be an effective means for locating communications scored High or Medium in negative sentiment by the SNIT or High in insider risk by the SIRDC within a randomly selected sample from the Enron archive. WT proved less effective in locating emails Low in negative sentiment on the SNIT and Low in insider risk on the SIRDC. However, WT performed extremely well in identifying communications from actual insiders randomly selected from case files and inserted in this email sample. In addition, it appeared that WT’s measure of perceived Victimization was a significant supplement to using negative sentiment alone, when it came to searching for actual insiders. Previous findings ( Shaw et al., 2013) indicate that this relative weakness in identifying low levels of negative sentiment may not impair WT’s usefulness for identifying communications containing