面部表情中悲伤决定的神经关联

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.1037/npe0000081
R. Viviani, L. Dommes, Julia E. Bosch, J. Stingl, P. Beschoner
{"title":"面部表情中悲伤决定的神经关联","authors":"R. Viviani, L. Dommes, Julia E. Bosch, J. Stingl, P. Beschoner","doi":"10.1037/npe0000081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Models of decision processes postulate the action of a similar mechanism when computing responses across very different domains, such as decisions made on the intensity of a stimulus or according to subjective preferences. However, the neural substrates of decision-making in domains such as those involving emotion processing in social interactions have as yet remained largely unexplored. In this functional neuroimaging study, we used a paradigm developed in neuroeconomical studies of subjective preferences to uncover the neural substrates involved in deciding the degree of sadness in facial expressions, which convey information on sufferance in conspecifics. Because of the possible association of facial expressions with stimulus properties such as the capacity to be emotionally arousing, we used a procedure designed to control for this possible confound. The contrast representing differences in attributed sadness activated the precuneus and posterior cingular cortex, areas often implicated in studies of subjective preference. Also, the somatosensory cortex was active, an area associated with both sensory discrimination tasks in the visual domain and whose lesion is known to result in deficits in emotion recognition. In the same contrast, no activation of the amygdala, the substrate of emotional arousal, was detected (or of any other area associated with the sensory processing of faces, such as the fusiform gyrus). These results suggest that specific networks beyond those sensitive to the arousing properties of emotional stimuli are active when making choices in a social–cognitive domain.","PeriodicalId":45695,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics","volume":"113 1","pages":"93–105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Neural Correlates of Decisions About Sadness in Facial Expressions\",\"authors\":\"R. Viviani, L. Dommes, Julia E. Bosch, J. Stingl, P. Beschoner\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/npe0000081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Models of decision processes postulate the action of a similar mechanism when computing responses across very different domains, such as decisions made on the intensity of a stimulus or according to subjective preferences. However, the neural substrates of decision-making in domains such as those involving emotion processing in social interactions have as yet remained largely unexplored. In this functional neuroimaging study, we used a paradigm developed in neuroeconomical studies of subjective preferences to uncover the neural substrates involved in deciding the degree of sadness in facial expressions, which convey information on sufferance in conspecifics. Because of the possible association of facial expressions with stimulus properties such as the capacity to be emotionally arousing, we used a procedure designed to control for this possible confound. The contrast representing differences in attributed sadness activated the precuneus and posterior cingular cortex, areas often implicated in studies of subjective preference. Also, the somatosensory cortex was active, an area associated with both sensory discrimination tasks in the visual domain and whose lesion is known to result in deficits in emotion recognition. In the same contrast, no activation of the amygdala, the substrate of emotional arousal, was detected (or of any other area associated with the sensory processing of faces, such as the fusiform gyrus). These results suggest that specific networks beyond those sensitive to the arousing properties of emotional stimuli are active when making choices in a social–cognitive domain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"93–105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

当计算不同领域的反应时,决策过程模型假设了类似机制的作用,例如根据刺激的强度或根据主观偏好做出的决策。然而,在诸如社会互动中涉及情感处理的领域中,决策的神经基础尚未得到很大程度的探索。在这项功能性神经成像研究中,我们使用了主观偏好的神经经济学研究中开发的范式来揭示参与决定面部表情中悲伤程度的神经基质,面部表情传达了在特定情况下的忍受信息。由于面部表情可能与刺激特性(如情绪唤起的能力)有关,我们使用了一种设计来控制这种可能的混淆的程序。这种差异激活了楔前叶和后扣带皮层,这两个区域通常与主观偏好的研究有关。此外,体感觉皮层也很活跃,这一区域与视觉领域的感觉辨别任务有关,并且已知其损伤会导致情绪识别的缺陷。与此形成对比的是,没有检测到杏仁核(情绪唤起的基础)的激活(或与面部感觉处理相关的任何其他区域,如梭状回)。这些结果表明,在社会认知领域做出选择时,除了那些对情绪刺激的唤起特性敏感的网络之外,还有一些特定的网络是活跃的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Neural Correlates of Decisions About Sadness in Facial Expressions
Models of decision processes postulate the action of a similar mechanism when computing responses across very different domains, such as decisions made on the intensity of a stimulus or according to subjective preferences. However, the neural substrates of decision-making in domains such as those involving emotion processing in social interactions have as yet remained largely unexplored. In this functional neuroimaging study, we used a paradigm developed in neuroeconomical studies of subjective preferences to uncover the neural substrates involved in deciding the degree of sadness in facial expressions, which convey information on sufferance in conspecifics. Because of the possible association of facial expressions with stimulus properties such as the capacity to be emotionally arousing, we used a procedure designed to control for this possible confound. The contrast representing differences in attributed sadness activated the precuneus and posterior cingular cortex, areas often implicated in studies of subjective preference. Also, the somatosensory cortex was active, an area associated with both sensory discrimination tasks in the visual domain and whose lesion is known to result in deficits in emotion recognition. In the same contrast, no activation of the amygdala, the substrate of emotional arousal, was detected (or of any other area associated with the sensory processing of faces, such as the fusiform gyrus). These results suggest that specific networks beyond those sensitive to the arousing properties of emotional stimuli are active when making choices in a social–cognitive domain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Self-reported and electroencephalogram responses to evaluate sponsorship congruence efficacy. Is geographical location really dead in the online world? An event-related potentials study. Motivating risky choices increases risk taking. Supplemental Material for From Genes to Performance: Dopaminergic Modulation of Decision Making in a Stock Market Simulation Supplemental Material for Motivating Risky Choices Increases Risk Taking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1