阑尾位置是否影响急性阑尾炎的临床结局

W. Chan, Naomi Hau-Yin Cheng, Kw Cheng, K. Cheung, M. Cheung, K. Ho, Lok-Lam E. Huen, Janet F.Y. Lee, K. Leung
{"title":"阑尾位置是否影响急性阑尾炎的临床结局","authors":"W. Chan, Naomi Hau-Yin Cheng, Kw Cheng, K. Cheung, M. Cheung, K. Ho, Lok-Lam E. Huen, Janet F.Y. Lee, K. Leung","doi":"10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00145.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To elucidate if the course of acute appendicitis is influenced by the variable positions of the appendix. The appendix positions were divided into two groups: (i) the anterior group, which included the anterior, the pelvic and the paracaecal positions; and (ii) the posterior group, which included the retrocaecal and retroileal positions. \n \n \n \nMethod: The hospital records of 161 patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from January 2000 to June 2001 at Prince of Wales Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. \n \n \n \nResults: Clinicians’ delay in reaching the diagnosis was longer in the posterior group (9.9 h vs 5.8 h; P=0.043). However, complicated appendicitis (gangrenous changes, perforation or abscess formation) was not associated with the appendix location (P = 0.078). The median operating time for laparoscopic appendectomies lasted longer in the posterior group (77.5 min vs 60 min; P = 0.02). These patients also had a longer hospital stay (6 days vs 4 days; P = 0.049). No difference was observed among patients who underwent open surgery. \n \n \n \nConclusion: Appendices in the ‘hidden’ position did not translate into a higher incidence of complicated appendicitis or postoperative complications except for the slightly longer hospital stay in patients treated by laparoscopy. Therefore, we concluded that the location of appendices does not affect the clinical course of appendicitis in the locality studied.","PeriodicalId":7943,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong","volume":"21 1","pages":"109-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does appendix position affect the clinical outcome of acute appendicitis\",\"authors\":\"W. Chan, Naomi Hau-Yin Cheng, Kw Cheng, K. Cheung, M. Cheung, K. Ho, Lok-Lam E. Huen, Janet F.Y. Lee, K. Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00145.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To elucidate if the course of acute appendicitis is influenced by the variable positions of the appendix. The appendix positions were divided into two groups: (i) the anterior group, which included the anterior, the pelvic and the paracaecal positions; and (ii) the posterior group, which included the retrocaecal and retroileal positions. \\n \\n \\n \\nMethod: The hospital records of 161 patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from January 2000 to June 2001 at Prince of Wales Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. \\n \\n \\n \\nResults: Clinicians’ delay in reaching the diagnosis was longer in the posterior group (9.9 h vs 5.8 h; P=0.043). However, complicated appendicitis (gangrenous changes, perforation or abscess formation) was not associated with the appendix location (P = 0.078). The median operating time for laparoscopic appendectomies lasted longer in the posterior group (77.5 min vs 60 min; P = 0.02). These patients also had a longer hospital stay (6 days vs 4 days; P = 0.049). No difference was observed among patients who underwent open surgery. \\n \\n \\n \\nConclusion: Appendices in the ‘hidden’ position did not translate into a higher incidence of complicated appendicitis or postoperative complications except for the slightly longer hospital stay in patients treated by laparoscopy. Therefore, we concluded that the location of appendices does not affect the clinical course of appendicitis in the locality studied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"109-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00145.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00145.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:探讨阑尾位置变化对急性阑尾炎病程的影响。阑尾位置分为两组:(i)前组,包括前、盆腔和尾旁位置;(ii)后组,包括盲肠后和回肠后位置。方法:对2000年1月至2001年6月在威尔斯亲王医院行急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术的161例患者的住院资料进行回顾性分析。结果:后路组临床医生延迟诊断的时间更长(9.9 h vs 5.8 h;P = 0.043)。而复杂性阑尾炎(坏疽、穿孔或脓肿形成)与阑尾位置无关(P = 0.078)。后路组腹腔镜阑尾切除术的中位手术时间更长(77.5 min vs 60 min;p = 0.02)。这些患者的住院时间也更长(6天vs 4天;p = 0.049)。在接受开放手术的患者中没有观察到差异。结论:阑尾处于“隐藏”位置并不意味着复杂阑尾炎或术后并发症的发生率更高,但腹腔镜手术患者的住院时间略长。因此,我们认为阑尾的位置不影响阑尾炎的临床病程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does appendix position affect the clinical outcome of acute appendicitis
Objective: To elucidate if the course of acute appendicitis is influenced by the variable positions of the appendix. The appendix positions were divided into two groups: (i) the anterior group, which included the anterior, the pelvic and the paracaecal positions; and (ii) the posterior group, which included the retrocaecal and retroileal positions. Method: The hospital records of 161 patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from January 2000 to June 2001 at Prince of Wales Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Clinicians’ delay in reaching the diagnosis was longer in the posterior group (9.9 h vs 5.8 h; P=0.043). However, complicated appendicitis (gangrenous changes, perforation or abscess formation) was not associated with the appendix location (P = 0.078). The median operating time for laparoscopic appendectomies lasted longer in the posterior group (77.5 min vs 60 min; P = 0.02). These patients also had a longer hospital stay (6 days vs 4 days; P = 0.049). No difference was observed among patients who underwent open surgery. Conclusion: Appendices in the ‘hidden’ position did not translate into a higher incidence of complicated appendicitis or postoperative complications except for the slightly longer hospital stay in patients treated by laparoscopy. Therefore, we concluded that the location of appendices does not affect the clinical course of appendicitis in the locality studied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The causes of synthetic vascular graft failure Skin substitutes: An overview Creation of a subcutaneous tunnel in antesternal oesophageal replacement with the aid of a rigid sigmoidoscope Evaluation of Hyphecan (1-4,2-acetamide-deoxy-B-D-glucan polymer) on wound healing in a rodent model Retained intra-aortic balloon pump catheter causing acute ischaemic limb: Report of two cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1