慢性硬膜下血肿的钻孔开颅术评价:一项随机非盲对照试验:新进展的慢性硬膜下血肿的钻孔开颅术与有或无冲洗引流

Sayaka Ito, Haruka Miyata, Tomoaki Fujita, Y. Nonoyama, T. Nakazawa, ShigeharuFukao
{"title":"慢性硬膜下血肿的钻孔开颅术评价:一项随机非盲对照试验:新进展的慢性硬膜下血肿的钻孔开颅术与有或无冲洗引流","authors":"Sayaka Ito, Haruka Miyata, Tomoaki Fujita, Y. Nonoyama, T. Nakazawa, ShigeharuFukao","doi":"10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common clinical entities in neurosurgical practice. Although the therapeutic management is well established with burr-hole craniostomy and drainage, patients with CSDH still suffer from recurrence up to 33% [1-3]. Recently reported randomized controlled studies revealed that drainage is the most effective treatment in controlling recurrence [4,5]. As far as we know, there is no reported trials revealing whether simple drainage without irrigation (simple drainage) or with irrigation (irrigation drainage) could treat CSDH with less recurrence rate compared to the other. The purpose of this study is toanalyze thepostoperative recurrence rate and complications between drainage with and without irrigation. The present trial is permitted by Institutional Review Board of Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital (No. 2020-18).","PeriodicalId":15375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical trials","volume":"28 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary on Assessment of Burr-Hole Craniostomy for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Randomized Unblinded Comparative Trial of Burr-HoleCraniostomies and Drainage with or without Irrigation for Newly Progressed Chronic Subdural Hematoma\",\"authors\":\"Sayaka Ito, Haruka Miyata, Tomoaki Fujita, Y. Nonoyama, T. Nakazawa, ShigeharuFukao\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common clinical entities in neurosurgical practice. Although the therapeutic management is well established with burr-hole craniostomy and drainage, patients with CSDH still suffer from recurrence up to 33% [1-3]. Recently reported randomized controlled studies revealed that drainage is the most effective treatment in controlling recurrence [4,5]. As far as we know, there is no reported trials revealing whether simple drainage without irrigation (simple drainage) or with irrigation (irrigation drainage) could treat CSDH with less recurrence rate compared to the other. The purpose of this study is toanalyze thepostoperative recurrence rate and complications between drainage with and without irrigation. The present trial is permitted by Institutional Review Board of Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital (No. 2020-18).\",\"PeriodicalId\":15375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"1-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)是神经外科最常见的临床疾病之一。虽然采用钻孔开颅引流的治疗方法较为完善,但CSDH患者的复发率仍高达33%[1-3]。最近报道的随机对照研究表明,引流是控制复发最有效的治疗方法[4,5]。据我们所知,目前还没有文献报道单纯引流不灌水(simple drainage)或灌水(irrigation drainage)治疗CSDH的复发率比单纯引流低。本研究的目的是分析有冲洗和无冲洗引流的术后复发率和并发症。本试验经京都冈本纪念医院机构审查委员会(No. 2020-18)批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Commentary on Assessment of Burr-Hole Craniostomy for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Randomized Unblinded Comparative Trial of Burr-HoleCraniostomies and Drainage with or without Irrigation for Newly Progressed Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common clinical entities in neurosurgical practice. Although the therapeutic management is well established with burr-hole craniostomy and drainage, patients with CSDH still suffer from recurrence up to 33% [1-3]. Recently reported randomized controlled studies revealed that drainage is the most effective treatment in controlling recurrence [4,5]. As far as we know, there is no reported trials revealing whether simple drainage without irrigation (simple drainage) or with irrigation (irrigation drainage) could treat CSDH with less recurrence rate compared to the other. The purpose of this study is toanalyze thepostoperative recurrence rate and complications between drainage with and without irrigation. The present trial is permitted by Institutional Review Board of Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital (No. 2020-18).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Targets and Mechanism of Banxia Xiexin Decoction on Precancerous Lesions of Gastric Cancer: Network pharmacology Swedish healthcare for women subjected to Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) Assessment of Malnutrition in Emergency Laparotomy Patients. A QIP Highlights Simple Measures To Improve Early Recognition and Optimisation of High-Risk Patients. The Impact Factor of Colon Polyp A Call to Redefine Undergraduate Medical Education: Fostering Scientific Research and Evidence driven Decision-Making among Future Physicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1