美国州内长途电信交换接入费用传递的监管授权实证分析

Debra J. Aron, David E. Burnstein, Ana C. Danies, G. Keith
{"title":"美国州内长途电信交换接入费用传递的监管授权实证分析","authors":"Debra J. Aron, David E. Burnstein, Ana C. Danies, G. Keith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1674082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the parlance of regulatory economics, “pass-through�? refers to the effect of a change in an incremental cost – generally, the effect of a change in a regulated input price – on the retail price of a good or service. In this paper we examine retail long distance telephone service prices in the United States for evidence of pass-through of the switched access fees paid by long distance telephone companies to local exchange carriers. We estimate the degree to which long distance companies pass through to their customers reductions in access rates, and we examine whether mandates imposed by regulators on long distance companies to pass through access fee reductions to customers affect the extent of pass-through. We evaluate annual panel data on intrastate long-distance revenues, access expenses, and minutes of use from 2004 to 2008 in each of the 50 states in the U.S. using a proprietary and detailed data set. We leverage the fact that some states have accompanied access rate reductions with pass-through mandates, and others have not. Using standard multivariate regression techniques we find that the market induces carriers to pass-through most of the reduction in access rates, and that this market-based pass-through is consistent with “full�? (100%) pass-through in the states that have undergone regulatory access reform. We also find that a regulatory mandate on long distance companies to pass through access rate reductions has no statistically significant effect on the magnitude of access fee pass-through, supporting the economic hypothesis that pass-through is driven by incentives for profit maximization and by competitive forces.","PeriodicalId":11485,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics: Applied Econometrics & Modeling eJournal","volume":"24 25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Analysis of Regulator Mandates on the Pass Through of Switched Access Fees for In-State Long-Distance Telecommunications in the U.S.\",\"authors\":\"Debra J. Aron, David E. Burnstein, Ana C. Danies, G. Keith\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1674082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the parlance of regulatory economics, “pass-through�? refers to the effect of a change in an incremental cost – generally, the effect of a change in a regulated input price – on the retail price of a good or service. In this paper we examine retail long distance telephone service prices in the United States for evidence of pass-through of the switched access fees paid by long distance telephone companies to local exchange carriers. We estimate the degree to which long distance companies pass through to their customers reductions in access rates, and we examine whether mandates imposed by regulators on long distance companies to pass through access fee reductions to customers affect the extent of pass-through. We evaluate annual panel data on intrastate long-distance revenues, access expenses, and minutes of use from 2004 to 2008 in each of the 50 states in the U.S. using a proprietary and detailed data set. We leverage the fact that some states have accompanied access rate reductions with pass-through mandates, and others have not. Using standard multivariate regression techniques we find that the market induces carriers to pass-through most of the reduction in access rates, and that this market-based pass-through is consistent with “full�? (100%) pass-through in the states that have undergone regulatory access reform. We also find that a regulatory mandate on long distance companies to pass through access rate reductions has no statistically significant effect on the magnitude of access fee pass-through, supporting the economic hypothesis that pass-through is driven by incentives for profit maximization and by competitive forces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometrics: Applied Econometrics & Modeling eJournal\",\"volume\":\"24 25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometrics: Applied Econometrics & Modeling eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1674082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics: Applied Econometrics & Modeling eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1674082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用监管经济学的说法,就是“传递”(pass-through)。指增量成本的变化对商品或服务零售价格的影响,通常是指受管制的投入价格变化的影响。在本文中,我们研究了美国的零售长途电话服务价格,以证明长途电话公司向当地交换运营商支付的交换接入费的传递。我们估计了长途电话公司将接入费的降低传递给客户的程度,并研究了监管机构要求长途电话公司将接入费的降低传递给客户的要求是否会影响传递的程度。我们使用专有和详细的数据集评估了2004年至2008年美国50个州的州内长途收入、接入费用和使用分钟数的年度面板数据。我们利用了这样一个事实,即一些州在降低接入率的同时实施了传递式授权,而另一些州则没有。使用标准的多元回归技术,我们发现市场诱导运营商通过接入率的大部分下降,并且这种基于市场的传递与“充分”一致。(100%)在进行了监管准入改革的州进行了传递。我们还发现,要求长途电话公司通过降低接入率的监管命令对接入费传递的幅度没有统计学上的显著影响,这支持了传递是由利润最大化激励和竞争力量驱动的经济学假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Empirical Analysis of Regulator Mandates on the Pass Through of Switched Access Fees for In-State Long-Distance Telecommunications in the U.S.
In the parlance of regulatory economics, “pass-through�? refers to the effect of a change in an incremental cost – generally, the effect of a change in a regulated input price – on the retail price of a good or service. In this paper we examine retail long distance telephone service prices in the United States for evidence of pass-through of the switched access fees paid by long distance telephone companies to local exchange carriers. We estimate the degree to which long distance companies pass through to their customers reductions in access rates, and we examine whether mandates imposed by regulators on long distance companies to pass through access fee reductions to customers affect the extent of pass-through. We evaluate annual panel data on intrastate long-distance revenues, access expenses, and minutes of use from 2004 to 2008 in each of the 50 states in the U.S. using a proprietary and detailed data set. We leverage the fact that some states have accompanied access rate reductions with pass-through mandates, and others have not. Using standard multivariate regression techniques we find that the market induces carriers to pass-through most of the reduction in access rates, and that this market-based pass-through is consistent with “full�? (100%) pass-through in the states that have undergone regulatory access reform. We also find that a regulatory mandate on long distance companies to pass through access rate reductions has no statistically significant effect on the magnitude of access fee pass-through, supporting the economic hypothesis that pass-through is driven by incentives for profit maximization and by competitive forces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discovering Causal Models with Optimization: Confounders, Cycles, and Feature Selection Improving the Wisdom of Crowds with Analysis of Variance of Predictions of Related Outcomes Canonical Correlation-based Model Selection for the Multilevel Factors Robust Forecasting Resurrecting the Size Effect: Firm Size, Profitability Shocks, and Expected Stock Returns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1