研究学习空间是否影响经验知识的保留

Robert A. Montgomery, Kelly F. Millenbah
{"title":"研究学习空间是否影响经验知识的保留","authors":"Robert A. Montgomery,&nbsp;Kelly F. Millenbah","doi":"10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Experiential learning describes structured educational opportunities that allow students to physically interact with the course material. This pedagogical technique promotes critical thinking, decision making, problem solving, and increases the retention of knowledge. Given that experiential learning can be employed in a variety of learning spaces (e.g., labs, lecture halls, and outdoor classrooms) we question whether there exists variation in students’ retention of experiential knowledge by learning space. Using an experiential knot-tying tutorial we tested whether natural resource students perform better in an outdoor learning space versus an indoor classroom. Our results demonstrate that students in the outdoor learning space learned significantly better than those in the indoor classroom following the initial tutorial. However, 30 and 65 days after the experiential tutorial there was no difference in the retention of knowledge between groups. Furthermore, no covariates considered (classroom type, prior experience, age, sex, or GPA) in our longitudinal analysis affected the retention of experiential knowledge. Although, this analysis determined that student retention of certain experiential knowledge is improved, at least initially, when learned in an applied outdoor setting, the overall lack of knowledge retention, regardless of learning space, highlights the importance of repeated opportunities to interact with course material.</p>","PeriodicalId":100810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","volume":"40 1","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0015","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Whether Learning Space Affects the Retention of Experiential Knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Robert A. Montgomery,&nbsp;Kelly F. Millenbah\",\"doi\":\"10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Experiential learning describes structured educational opportunities that allow students to physically interact with the course material. This pedagogical technique promotes critical thinking, decision making, problem solving, and increases the retention of knowledge. Given that experiential learning can be employed in a variety of learning spaces (e.g., labs, lecture halls, and outdoor classrooms) we question whether there exists variation in students’ retention of experiential knowledge by learning space. Using an experiential knot-tying tutorial we tested whether natural resource students perform better in an outdoor learning space versus an indoor classroom. Our results demonstrate that students in the outdoor learning space learned significantly better than those in the indoor classroom following the initial tutorial. However, 30 and 65 days after the experiential tutorial there was no difference in the retention of knowledge between groups. Furthermore, no covariates considered (classroom type, prior experience, age, sex, or GPA) in our longitudinal analysis affected the retention of experiential knowledge. Although, this analysis determined that student retention of certain experiential knowledge is improved, at least initially, when learned in an applied outdoor setting, the overall lack of knowledge retention, regardless of learning space, highlights the importance of repeated opportunities to interact with course material.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"45-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0015\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

体验式学习描述了结构化的教育机会,允许学生与课程材料进行实际互动。这种教学方法促进批判性思维,决策,解决问题,并增加知识的保留。鉴于体验式学习可以在各种学习空间(如实验室、演讲厅和室外教室)中进行,我们质疑学生在学习空间中对体验式知识的保留是否存在差异。我们使用体验式打结教程测试了自然资源学生在室外学习空间比在室内学习空间表现更好。我们的研究结果表明,在最初的辅导后,学生在户外学习空间的学习效果明显优于室内课堂的学生。然而,在体验式辅导后的30天和65天,两组之间的知识保留没有差异。此外,在我们的纵向分析中,没有考虑协变量(课堂类型、先前经验、年龄、性别或GPA)影响经验知识的保留。尽管这一分析表明,当学生在户外应用环境中学习时,他们对某些经验知识的记忆有所提高,至少最初是这样,但无论学习空间如何,知识记忆的总体缺乏都凸显了反复接触课程材料的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining Whether Learning Space Affects the Retention of Experiential Knowledge

Experiential learning describes structured educational opportunities that allow students to physically interact with the course material. This pedagogical technique promotes critical thinking, decision making, problem solving, and increases the retention of knowledge. Given that experiential learning can be employed in a variety of learning spaces (e.g., labs, lecture halls, and outdoor classrooms) we question whether there exists variation in students’ retention of experiential knowledge by learning space. Using an experiential knot-tying tutorial we tested whether natural resource students perform better in an outdoor learning space versus an indoor classroom. Our results demonstrate that students in the outdoor learning space learned significantly better than those in the indoor classroom following the initial tutorial. However, 30 and 65 days after the experiential tutorial there was no difference in the retention of knowledge between groups. Furthermore, no covariates considered (classroom type, prior experience, age, sex, or GPA) in our longitudinal analysis affected the retention of experiential knowledge. Although, this analysis determined that student retention of certain experiential knowledge is improved, at least initially, when learned in an applied outdoor setting, the overall lack of knowledge retention, regardless of learning space, highlights the importance of repeated opportunities to interact with course material.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corn Rootworm: Small Insect, Big Impact Assessing Student Learning with Surveys and a Pre-Test/Post-Test in an Online Course Student Presentations of Case Studies to Illustrate Core Concepts in Soil Biogeochemistry Using Student Competition Field Trips to Increase Teaching and Learning Effectiveness JNRLSE Editorial Board Minutes for 2011
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1