新标准与机遇:重新思考学校的优秀写作

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Writing & Pedagogy Pub Date : 2015-07-17 DOI:10.1558/WAP.V7I2-3.18449
Jennifer I. Berne, Susan I. McMahon
{"title":"新标准与机遇:重新思考学校的优秀写作","authors":"Jennifer I. Berne, Susan I. McMahon","doi":"10.1558/WAP.V7I2-3.18449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New standards for writing provide the opportunity to rethink definitions of what writing is in schools. While traditional assessment methods align with many of the new standards and offer an important tool for gauging the success of some elements of writing, they often neglect other elements. In traditional assessment, the elements that are quantifiable become those that are valued. Teachers can promote consideration of other elements, those intangibles that change a text from an assignment to be completed into a powerful communicative act, by intervening in the prewriting or planning stage of the writing process. This article discusses one possible form of intervention in which the teacher has a conversation with a student that centers on the student’s investment of interest in her/his topic and helps the student plan a paper that will make a unique contribution and not just fulfill a task. By using a prewriting rubric to focus the conversation, the teacher is able to track student progress in understanding and enacting this important component of writing.","PeriodicalId":42573,"journal":{"name":"Writing & Pedagogy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Standards and Opportunities: Rethinking Good Writing in Schools\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer I. Berne, Susan I. McMahon\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/WAP.V7I2-3.18449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New standards for writing provide the opportunity to rethink definitions of what writing is in schools. While traditional assessment methods align with many of the new standards and offer an important tool for gauging the success of some elements of writing, they often neglect other elements. In traditional assessment, the elements that are quantifiable become those that are valued. Teachers can promote consideration of other elements, those intangibles that change a text from an assignment to be completed into a powerful communicative act, by intervening in the prewriting or planning stage of the writing process. This article discusses one possible form of intervention in which the teacher has a conversation with a student that centers on the student’s investment of interest in her/his topic and helps the student plan a paper that will make a unique contribution and not just fulfill a task. By using a prewriting rubric to focus the conversation, the teacher is able to track student progress in understanding and enacting this important component of writing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Writing & Pedagogy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Writing & Pedagogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/WAP.V7I2-3.18449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing & Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/WAP.V7I2-3.18449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新的写作标准为重新思考学校写作的定义提供了机会。虽然传统的评估方法与许多新标准保持一致,并提供了衡量写作某些元素是否成功的重要工具,但它们往往忽视了其他元素。在传统的评估中,那些可量化的元素变成了那些被重视的元素。教师可以通过介入写作过程的预写或计划阶段,促进对其他因素的考虑,这些无形因素将文本从待完成的作业转变为强大的交际行为。本文讨论了一种可能的干预形式,即教师与学生进行对话,以学生对其主题的兴趣为中心,帮助学生计划一篇将做出独特贡献的论文,而不仅仅是完成一项任务。通过使用写作前的标题来聚焦对话,教师能够跟踪学生在理解和执行写作中这一重要组成部分方面的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Standards and Opportunities: Rethinking Good Writing in Schools
New standards for writing provide the opportunity to rethink definitions of what writing is in schools. While traditional assessment methods align with many of the new standards and offer an important tool for gauging the success of some elements of writing, they often neglect other elements. In traditional assessment, the elements that are quantifiable become those that are valued. Teachers can promote consideration of other elements, those intangibles that change a text from an assignment to be completed into a powerful communicative act, by intervening in the prewriting or planning stage of the writing process. This article discusses one possible form of intervention in which the teacher has a conversation with a student that centers on the student’s investment of interest in her/his topic and helps the student plan a paper that will make a unique contribution and not just fulfill a task. By using a prewriting rubric to focus the conversation, the teacher is able to track student progress in understanding and enacting this important component of writing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Writing & Pedagogy
Writing & Pedagogy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Writing and identity: Promoting critical discourse amidst double consciousness Writing as resistance in an age of demagoguery Making sense of resistance in an afterschool tutoring program: Learning from volunteer writing tutors Stray dogs: Interviews with working-class writers, edited by Daniel M. Mendoza Schools, sexual violence, and safety: Adolescent girls and writing resistance at an afterschool program in suburban Mumbai
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1