旧的理论适合新的背景吗?创业型公司治理的新视角

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Venture Capital Pub Date : 2023-03-08 DOI:10.1080/13691066.2023.2178365
C. Bellavitis, M. Deloof, I. Filatotchev, N. Hermes, Ine Paeleman
{"title":"旧的理论适合新的背景吗?创业型公司治理的新视角","authors":"C. Bellavitis, M. Deloof, I. Filatotchev, N. Hermes, Ine Paeleman","doi":"10.1080/13691066.2023.2178365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporate governance deals with the mechanisms used by organizations to enhance the power and accountability of key stakeholders who are responsible for generating, protecting, and distributing firm wealth. The extant literature has adopted four main theories to explain corporate governance mechanisms. Historically, agency theory has provided the first theoretical inroads in the field as it argues that the overarching aim of corporate governance is to minimize agency costs and conflicts of interest between the providers (principals) and users (agents) of financial capital (Filatotchev and Wright 2011). Agency costs include monitoring costs and efforts that are necessary to align the interests of principals and agents and mitigate information asymmetry, adverse selection, moral hazard and shirking behaviors. More recent theoretical developments include the resource-based view that underlines the role of directors and managers in gathering and deploying unique and valuable resources to achieve a firm’s competitive advantage (Wernerfelt 1984). Institutional theory researchers have focused on how institutions such as governments or culture influence corporate governance initiatives (Bell, Filatotchev, and Aguilera 2014). Finally, stakeholder theory enlarges the meaning of the firm from shareholders to stakeholders. It emphasizes values that go beyond simple economic profits. Through stakeholder theory, researchers investigate how corporate governance should be designed in order to create value for all stakeholders, as well as how stakeholders can influence corporate governance. Notwithstanding the value of previous studies and theories, the majority of the existing corporate governance literature has focused on large and publicly listed firms operating in obsolete segments of the economy. However, the business landscape has evolved alongside societal changes, both technological as well as cultural. Entrepreneurial firms have taken advantage of these changes to create new business models, radically shaping legacy industries such as car manufacturing (e.g., Tesla, Lucid Motors), movie making (e.g., Netflix), medicine (e.g., Moderna), transportation (e.g., Uber), banking (e.g., Revolut), hospitality (e.g., AirBnB), and fundraising (e.g., Kickstarter, Indiegogo), among many others. Therefore, it is important to understand whether existing theories fit the purpose of describing these new contexts and entrepreneurial ventures. In order to fill this gap, this special issue focuses on the intersection between societal changes – technological and cultural – and entrepreneurial firms. Most of these entrepreneurial firms are powered and influenced by new technologies and cultural shifts that have opened up immense possibilities for new business models and different sources of competitive advantage. The agency relations, resources, institutional settings and stakeholders in entrepreneurial firms operating in cutting edge technological environments are often very different from those in mature firms operating in obsolete environments, VENTURE CAPITAL 2023, VOL. 25, NO. 2, 117–133 https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2023.2178365","PeriodicalId":46643,"journal":{"name":"Venture Capital","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do old theories fit new contexts? New perspectives on corporate governance in entrepreneurial firms\",\"authors\":\"C. Bellavitis, M. Deloof, I. Filatotchev, N. Hermes, Ine Paeleman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13691066.2023.2178365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Corporate governance deals with the mechanisms used by organizations to enhance the power and accountability of key stakeholders who are responsible for generating, protecting, and distributing firm wealth. The extant literature has adopted four main theories to explain corporate governance mechanisms. Historically, agency theory has provided the first theoretical inroads in the field as it argues that the overarching aim of corporate governance is to minimize agency costs and conflicts of interest between the providers (principals) and users (agents) of financial capital (Filatotchev and Wright 2011). Agency costs include monitoring costs and efforts that are necessary to align the interests of principals and agents and mitigate information asymmetry, adverse selection, moral hazard and shirking behaviors. More recent theoretical developments include the resource-based view that underlines the role of directors and managers in gathering and deploying unique and valuable resources to achieve a firm’s competitive advantage (Wernerfelt 1984). Institutional theory researchers have focused on how institutions such as governments or culture influence corporate governance initiatives (Bell, Filatotchev, and Aguilera 2014). Finally, stakeholder theory enlarges the meaning of the firm from shareholders to stakeholders. It emphasizes values that go beyond simple economic profits. Through stakeholder theory, researchers investigate how corporate governance should be designed in order to create value for all stakeholders, as well as how stakeholders can influence corporate governance. Notwithstanding the value of previous studies and theories, the majority of the existing corporate governance literature has focused on large and publicly listed firms operating in obsolete segments of the economy. However, the business landscape has evolved alongside societal changes, both technological as well as cultural. Entrepreneurial firms have taken advantage of these changes to create new business models, radically shaping legacy industries such as car manufacturing (e.g., Tesla, Lucid Motors), movie making (e.g., Netflix), medicine (e.g., Moderna), transportation (e.g., Uber), banking (e.g., Revolut), hospitality (e.g., AirBnB), and fundraising (e.g., Kickstarter, Indiegogo), among many others. Therefore, it is important to understand whether existing theories fit the purpose of describing these new contexts and entrepreneurial ventures. In order to fill this gap, this special issue focuses on the intersection between societal changes – technological and cultural – and entrepreneurial firms. Most of these entrepreneurial firms are powered and influenced by new technologies and cultural shifts that have opened up immense possibilities for new business models and different sources of competitive advantage. The agency relations, resources, institutional settings and stakeholders in entrepreneurial firms operating in cutting edge technological environments are often very different from those in mature firms operating in obsolete environments, VENTURE CAPITAL 2023, VOL. 25, NO. 2, 117–133 https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2023.2178365\",\"PeriodicalId\":46643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Venture Capital\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Venture Capital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2023.2178365\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Venture Capital","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2023.2178365","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公司治理是指组织用来增强主要利益相关者的权力和责任的机制,这些利益相关者负责创造、保护和分配公司财富。现有文献主要采用四种理论来解释公司治理机制。从历史上看,代理理论为该领域提供了第一个理论进展,因为它认为公司治理的总体目标是最大限度地减少代理成本和金融资本提供者(委托人)和使用者(代理人)之间的利益冲突(Filatotchev和Wright 2011)。代理成本包括协调委托人和代理人的利益、减轻信息不对称、逆向选择、道德风险和逃避行为所必需的监督成本和努力。最近的理论发展包括资源基础观点,强调董事和经理在收集和部署独特和有价值的资源以实现公司竞争优势方面的作用(Wernerfelt 1984)。制度理论研究者关注政府或文化等机构如何影响公司治理举措(Bell, Filatotchev, and Aguilera 2014)。最后,利益相关者理论将企业的意义从股东扩大到利益相关者。它强调的价值观超越了简单的经济利益。通过利益相关者理论,研究者研究了公司治理应该如何设计,以便为所有利益相关者创造价值,以及利益相关者如何影响公司治理。尽管先前的研究和理论具有价值,但现有的大多数公司治理文献都侧重于在过时的经济部门中运营的大型上市公司。然而,商业环境随着社会的变化而变化,包括技术和文化的变化。创业公司利用这些变化创造了新的商业模式,从根本上改变了传统行业,如汽车制造(如特斯拉、Lucid Motors)、电影制作(如Netflix)、医药(如Moderna)、交通运输(如Uber)、银行(如Revolut)、酒店(如AirBnB)和筹款(如Kickstarter、Indiegogo)等。因此,了解现有理论是否适合描述这些新环境和创业企业的目的是很重要的。为了填补这一空白,本期特刊聚焦于社会变革(技术和文化)与创业公司之间的交集。这些创业公司大多受到新技术和文化转变的推动和影响,这些新技术和文化转变为新的商业模式和不同的竞争优势来源开辟了巨大的可能性。前沿技术环境下创业企业的代理关系、资源、制度设置和利益相关者往往与在过时环境下运营的成熟企业有很大不同,《风险投资》,第25卷,第1期。2,117 - 133 https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2023.2178365
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do old theories fit new contexts? New perspectives on corporate governance in entrepreneurial firms
Corporate governance deals with the mechanisms used by organizations to enhance the power and accountability of key stakeholders who are responsible for generating, protecting, and distributing firm wealth. The extant literature has adopted four main theories to explain corporate governance mechanisms. Historically, agency theory has provided the first theoretical inroads in the field as it argues that the overarching aim of corporate governance is to minimize agency costs and conflicts of interest between the providers (principals) and users (agents) of financial capital (Filatotchev and Wright 2011). Agency costs include monitoring costs and efforts that are necessary to align the interests of principals and agents and mitigate information asymmetry, adverse selection, moral hazard and shirking behaviors. More recent theoretical developments include the resource-based view that underlines the role of directors and managers in gathering and deploying unique and valuable resources to achieve a firm’s competitive advantage (Wernerfelt 1984). Institutional theory researchers have focused on how institutions such as governments or culture influence corporate governance initiatives (Bell, Filatotchev, and Aguilera 2014). Finally, stakeholder theory enlarges the meaning of the firm from shareholders to stakeholders. It emphasizes values that go beyond simple economic profits. Through stakeholder theory, researchers investigate how corporate governance should be designed in order to create value for all stakeholders, as well as how stakeholders can influence corporate governance. Notwithstanding the value of previous studies and theories, the majority of the existing corporate governance literature has focused on large and publicly listed firms operating in obsolete segments of the economy. However, the business landscape has evolved alongside societal changes, both technological as well as cultural. Entrepreneurial firms have taken advantage of these changes to create new business models, radically shaping legacy industries such as car manufacturing (e.g., Tesla, Lucid Motors), movie making (e.g., Netflix), medicine (e.g., Moderna), transportation (e.g., Uber), banking (e.g., Revolut), hospitality (e.g., AirBnB), and fundraising (e.g., Kickstarter, Indiegogo), among many others. Therefore, it is important to understand whether existing theories fit the purpose of describing these new contexts and entrepreneurial ventures. In order to fill this gap, this special issue focuses on the intersection between societal changes – technological and cultural – and entrepreneurial firms. Most of these entrepreneurial firms are powered and influenced by new technologies and cultural shifts that have opened up immense possibilities for new business models and different sources of competitive advantage. The agency relations, resources, institutional settings and stakeholders in entrepreneurial firms operating in cutting edge technological environments are often very different from those in mature firms operating in obsolete environments, VENTURE CAPITAL 2023, VOL. 25, NO. 2, 117–133 https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2023.2178365
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Venture Capital
Venture Capital BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Venture Capital publishes cutting edge research-based papers from academics and practitioners on all aspects of private equity finance such as: •institutional venture capital •informal venture capital •corporate venture capital •public sector venture capital •community venture capital It also covers all aspects of the venture capital process from investment decision to exit, including studies on: •investment patterns •investment decision-making •investment performance •realisation of investment value exit routes (including the relationship with junior capital markets such as NASDAQ, EASDAQ, AIM and Nouvelle March). •economic impact and public policy
期刊最新文献
Private captive fund providers and the likelihood of achieving successful venture capital exits Compensation incentive, misappropriation risk, and startup innovation: the role of corporate venture capital manager in resource transfer The role of actively open-minded thinking and control orientation in venture capital investment outcomes Private equity, venture capital and patents: a bibliometric review and future research The impact of time constraints on new venture investment decisions: an experimental study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1