比经验更重要:对团队成员进行任务后反思干预可提高学生团队在模拟复苏任务中的表现--前瞻性随机试验。

IF 0.1 2区 历史学 Q4 HISTORY ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY Pub Date : 2020-03-02 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000395
Patrizia Kündig, Franziska Tschan, Norbert K Semmer, Camille Morgenthaler, Jasmin Zimmermann, Eliane Holzer, Simon Andreas Huber, Sabina Hunziker, Stephan Marsch
{"title":"比经验更重要:对团队成员进行任务后反思干预可提高学生团队在模拟复苏任务中的表现--前瞻性随机试验。","authors":"Patrizia Kündig, Franziska Tschan, Norbert K Semmer, Camille Morgenthaler, Jasmin Zimmermann, Eliane Holzer, Simon Andreas Huber, Sabina Hunziker, Stephan Marsch","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Teams that regularly step back from action and deliberately reflect on their performance and strategies show higher performance. Ad hoc emergency teams with changing team composition cannot develop such habits but may engage in short postaction reflection to discuss shortcomings of past performance and potential adaptations of their strategies for future similar tasks. This study aimed to test the effect of a short postaction self-led reflective team briefing on resuscitation performance in a simulator setting in terms of three performance parameters: hands-on time, coordination between chest compression and ventilation, and defibrillation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a randomised controlled trial including 56 ad hoc formed teams of three fourth-year medical students each. All groups performed a resuscitation task, followed by a self-guided reflective briefing, based on a general instruction (n=28 teams), or an unrelated discussion session (control condition; n=29), followed by a second resuscitation task in the same team composition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjusted for performance in the first task, teams in the reflection condition showed higher performance gain in the second resuscitation than teams in the control condition (6.21 percentage points (95% CI 1.31 to 11.10, p<0.001)) for basic hands-on performance; 15.0 percentage points (95% CI 2 to 28, p<0.001) for coordinative performance but non-significantly lower performance for defibrillation (-9%, 95% CI -27% to -9%, p=0.312).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even very short self-led postaction reflective briefings enhance basic resuscitation performance in ad hoc groups but may not influence more complex aspects of the task. We recommend including short self-led team debriefings as part of simulator training.</p>","PeriodicalId":42621,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY","volume":"37 1","pages":"81-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More than experience: a post-task reflection intervention among team members enhances performance in student teams confronted with a simulated resuscitation task-a prospective randomised trial.\",\"authors\":\"Patrizia Kündig, Franziska Tschan, Norbert K Semmer, Camille Morgenthaler, Jasmin Zimmermann, Eliane Holzer, Simon Andreas Huber, Sabina Hunziker, Stephan Marsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Teams that regularly step back from action and deliberately reflect on their performance and strategies show higher performance. Ad hoc emergency teams with changing team composition cannot develop such habits but may engage in short postaction reflection to discuss shortcomings of past performance and potential adaptations of their strategies for future similar tasks. This study aimed to test the effect of a short postaction self-led reflective team briefing on resuscitation performance in a simulator setting in terms of three performance parameters: hands-on time, coordination between chest compression and ventilation, and defibrillation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a randomised controlled trial including 56 ad hoc formed teams of three fourth-year medical students each. All groups performed a resuscitation task, followed by a self-guided reflective briefing, based on a general instruction (n=28 teams), or an unrelated discussion session (control condition; n=29), followed by a second resuscitation task in the same team composition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjusted for performance in the first task, teams in the reflection condition showed higher performance gain in the second resuscitation than teams in the control condition (6.21 percentage points (95% CI 1.31 to 11.10, p<0.001)) for basic hands-on performance; 15.0 percentage points (95% CI 2 to 28, p<0.001) for coordinative performance but non-significantly lower performance for defibrillation (-9%, 95% CI -27% to -9%, p=0.312).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even very short self-led postaction reflective briefings enhance basic resuscitation performance in ad hoc groups but may not influence more complex aspects of the task. We recommend including short self-led team debriefings as part of simulator training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"81-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936849/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000395\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000395","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经常从行动中后退并有意识地反思自己的表现和策略的团队表现出更高的绩效。团队组成不断变化的临时急救团队无法养成这样的习惯,但可以在行动后进行简短反思,讨论过去表现的不足之处,以及对未来类似任务的策略进行调整的可能性。本研究旨在测试在模拟器环境中,行动后自我主导的简短反思性团队简报对复苏表现的影响,包括三个表现参数:动手时间、胸外按压与通气之间的协调以及除颤:我们进行了一项随机对照试验,包括 56 个临时组成的小组,每个小组由三名四年级医学生组成。所有小组在完成一项复苏任务后,根据一般指导(28 个小组)或不相关的讨论环节(对照组;29 个小组)进行自我指导的反思性简报,然后以相同的小组组成进行第二项复苏任务:结果:根据第一项任务的表现进行调整后,反思条件下的团队在第二次复苏中的表现收益高于对照条件下的团队(6.21 个百分点(95% CI 1.31 至 11.10,p)):即使是很短的自我主导行动后反思简报也能提高特设小组的基本复苏表现,但可能不会影响任务的更复杂方面。我们建议将简短的自我主导团队汇报作为模拟器培训的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
More than experience: a post-task reflection intervention among team members enhances performance in student teams confronted with a simulated resuscitation task-a prospective randomised trial.

Background: Teams that regularly step back from action and deliberately reflect on their performance and strategies show higher performance. Ad hoc emergency teams with changing team composition cannot develop such habits but may engage in short postaction reflection to discuss shortcomings of past performance and potential adaptations of their strategies for future similar tasks. This study aimed to test the effect of a short postaction self-led reflective team briefing on resuscitation performance in a simulator setting in terms of three performance parameters: hands-on time, coordination between chest compression and ventilation, and defibrillation.

Methods: We performed a randomised controlled trial including 56 ad hoc formed teams of three fourth-year medical students each. All groups performed a resuscitation task, followed by a self-guided reflective briefing, based on a general instruction (n=28 teams), or an unrelated discussion session (control condition; n=29), followed by a second resuscitation task in the same team composition.

Results: Adjusted for performance in the first task, teams in the reflection condition showed higher performance gain in the second resuscitation than teams in the control condition (6.21 percentage points (95% CI 1.31 to 11.10, p<0.001)) for basic hands-on performance; 15.0 percentage points (95% CI 2 to 28, p<0.001) for coordinative performance but non-significantly lower performance for defibrillation (-9%, 95% CI -27% to -9%, p=0.312).

Conclusion: Even very short self-led postaction reflective briefings enhance basic resuscitation performance in ad hoc groups but may not influence more complex aspects of the task. We recommend including short self-led team debriefings as part of simulator training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medicine and Healing in Martin Luther’s Thought Die Vermessung der Arche Noah. Mosaische Physik im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert Historia Persecutionum Ecclesiae Bohemicae between History, Identity, and Martyrology Inhalt The Early Salvation Theology of Juan de Valdés: Luther Once Again
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1