没有人谈论过……”:产后对社会对新母亲的主要叙述的反叙述

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION Southern Communication Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-24 DOI:10.1080/1041794X.2023.2182905
S. LeBlanc, Lindsay M. Butcher, Rachel P. Mitchell, Julianna Russel, Jessi Navarro
{"title":"没有人谈论过……”:产后对社会对新母亲的主要叙述的反叙述","authors":"S. LeBlanc, Lindsay M. Butcher, Rachel P. Mitchell, Julianna Russel, Jessi Navarro","doi":"10.1080/1041794X.2023.2182905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this study, we examine narratives to discover how new mothers narrate about the postpartum period if the experiences mirror that of the master narrative, and how new mothers make sense of postpartum anxiety. We explored 22 narratives collected between October 2019 and March 2020 for insights into how new mothers’ narratives complemented or refuted the master “good” mother narrative. Data were analyzed based on Tracy’s (2018) iterative process. While the master narrative of “good mother” was alluded to, new mothers’ discourse diverged and refuted the master narrative of how mothers should mother postpartum. New mothers say the lack of warning about the postpartum period impacts themselves, their bond with their babies, and their spousal relationships. As a result, new mothers highlighted how bingos and mom guilt caused their anxiousness. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46274,"journal":{"name":"Southern Communication Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No One Ever Talked About…”:The Postpartum Counter-Narrative to Society’s Master Narrative on New Mothering\",\"authors\":\"S. LeBlanc, Lindsay M. Butcher, Rachel P. Mitchell, Julianna Russel, Jessi Navarro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1041794X.2023.2182905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this study, we examine narratives to discover how new mothers narrate about the postpartum period if the experiences mirror that of the master narrative, and how new mothers make sense of postpartum anxiety. We explored 22 narratives collected between October 2019 and March 2020 for insights into how new mothers’ narratives complemented or refuted the master “good” mother narrative. Data were analyzed based on Tracy’s (2018) iterative process. While the master narrative of “good mother” was alluded to, new mothers’ discourse diverged and refuted the master narrative of how mothers should mother postpartum. New mothers say the lack of warning about the postpartum period impacts themselves, their bond with their babies, and their spousal relationships. As a result, new mothers highlighted how bingos and mom guilt caused their anxiousness. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Communication Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Communication Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2023.2182905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2023.2182905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们考察了叙事,以发现新妈妈如何叙述产后时期,如果经验反映了主叙事,以及新妈妈如何理解产后焦虑。我们研究了2019年10月至2020年3月期间收集的22种叙事,以深入了解新妈妈的叙事是如何补充或驳斥主要的“好”母亲叙事的。数据分析基于Tracy(2018)的迭代过程。在提到“好妈妈”的主叙事的同时,新妈妈们的话语却出现了分歧,驳斥了“妈妈应该如何做产后妈妈”的主叙事。新妈妈们说,缺乏产后预警会影响她们自己、她们与孩子的关系以及她们的配偶关系。结果,新妈妈们强调了宾果游戏和妈妈内疚是如何导致她们焦虑的。讨论了今后研究的意义和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
No One Ever Talked About…”:The Postpartum Counter-Narrative to Society’s Master Narrative on New Mothering
ABSTRACT In this study, we examine narratives to discover how new mothers narrate about the postpartum period if the experiences mirror that of the master narrative, and how new mothers make sense of postpartum anxiety. We explored 22 narratives collected between October 2019 and March 2020 for insights into how new mothers’ narratives complemented or refuted the master “good” mother narrative. Data were analyzed based on Tracy’s (2018) iterative process. While the master narrative of “good mother” was alluded to, new mothers’ discourse diverged and refuted the master narrative of how mothers should mother postpartum. New mothers say the lack of warning about the postpartum period impacts themselves, their bond with their babies, and their spousal relationships. As a result, new mothers highlighted how bingos and mom guilt caused their anxiousness. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Dominant Factors Driving Civic Engagement on of the Bandung City Government’s Social Media Instructor Communicative Behaviors as Cultivators of Students’ Task Value Managing Jealousy within Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships: A Critical Discursive Psychological Approach Explicating the Pathways Among Memorable Message Themes About Religion and Spirituality, Positive Role Models for Aging, and Successful Aging Understanding Media Effects Through Media Technological Attributes: Young People’s Second Screening Use and Political Efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1