Metallgesellschaft使用石油期货是一种理性的企业战略吗?

Philip K. Verleger Jr.
{"title":"Metallgesellschaft使用石油期货是一种理性的企业战略吗?","authors":"Philip K. Verleger Jr.","doi":"10.1016/S1085-7443(99)00004-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Financial losses incurred in trading petroleum futures by Metallgesellschaft have been viewed as a mistake that occurred because the firm's Supervisory Board overreacted. However, these conclusions have been based on an incomplete analysis of the firm's business and petroleum markets. Metallgesellschaft's futures market position was excessively large, poorly distributed, and in the wrong products when the firm's long-term, fixed-price supply arrangements are balanced against its obligations to customers. Furthermore, Metallgesellschaft was unprotected financially against its long-term purchase obligations if its customers triggered the so-called “blowout” option. Finally, Metallgesellschaft's trading practices exposed the firm to the risk that the specifications of the commodities it had agreed to deliver would change and to the risk of manipulation by other firms. At least one large company has reported publicly that it profited at Metallgesellschaft's expense.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 89-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1085-7443(99)00004-6","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Was Metallgesellschaft's use of petroleum futures part of a rational corporate strategy?\",\"authors\":\"Philip K. Verleger Jr.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1085-7443(99)00004-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Financial losses incurred in trading petroleum futures by Metallgesellschaft have been viewed as a mistake that occurred because the firm's Supervisory Board overreacted. However, these conclusions have been based on an incomplete analysis of the firm's business and petroleum markets. Metallgesellschaft's futures market position was excessively large, poorly distributed, and in the wrong products when the firm's long-term, fixed-price supply arrangements are balanced against its obligations to customers. Furthermore, Metallgesellschaft was unprotected financially against its long-term purchase obligations if its customers triggered the so-called “blowout” option. Finally, Metallgesellschaft's trading practices exposed the firm to the risk that the specifications of the commodities it had agreed to deliver would change and to the risk of manipulation by other firms. At least one large company has reported publicly that it profited at Metallgesellschaft's expense.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Energy Finance & Development\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 89-115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1085-7443(99)00004-6\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Energy Finance & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1085744399000046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1085744399000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

Metallgesellschaft在石油期货交易中发生的财务损失被视为一个错误,因为该公司的监事会反应过度。然而,这些结论是基于对公司业务和石油市场的不完全分析。Metallgesellschaft的期货市场头寸过大,分布不均,而且当公司的长期固定价格供应安排与其对客户的义务相平衡时,它的产品是错误的。此外,如果客户触发所谓的“井喷”选项,Metallgesellschaft将在财务上不受长期购买义务的保护。最后,Metallgesellschaft的交易行为暴露了公司的风险,即它同意交付的商品规格可能会改变,也暴露了被其他公司操纵的风险。至少有一家大公司公开报告称,它以牺牲Metallgesellschaft为代价获利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Was Metallgesellschaft's use of petroleum futures part of a rational corporate strategy?

Financial losses incurred in trading petroleum futures by Metallgesellschaft have been viewed as a mistake that occurred because the firm's Supervisory Board overreacted. However, these conclusions have been based on an incomplete analysis of the firm's business and petroleum markets. Metallgesellschaft's futures market position was excessively large, poorly distributed, and in the wrong products when the firm's long-term, fixed-price supply arrangements are balanced against its obligations to customers. Furthermore, Metallgesellschaft was unprotected financially against its long-term purchase obligations if its customers triggered the so-called “blowout” option. Finally, Metallgesellschaft's trading practices exposed the firm to the risk that the specifications of the commodities it had agreed to deliver would change and to the risk of manipulation by other firms. At least one large company has reported publicly that it profited at Metallgesellschaft's expense.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimization of Energy Efficiency Barriers in the Context of Optimization of Management Decisions in the Process of Sustainable Development Household heterogeneity in valuation of heating energy costs ROLE OF BIG DATA IN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FOR FINANCIAL FRAUD Porous CoP@RGO With Pseudocapacitance Characteristics for Lithium Ion Storage Factors Affecting Renters’ Electricity Use: More than Split Incentives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1