“正当化”堕胎的问题:为什么真正的生殖正义不能通过理论化堕胎的合法性来实现

K. Kimport, M. McLemore
{"title":"“正当化”堕胎的问题:为什么真正的生殖正义不能通过理论化堕胎的合法性来实现","authors":"K. Kimport, M. McLemore","doi":"10.1080/03610926.2021.1999587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a commentary on Adair and Lozano’s (2021) article “Adaptive choice: Psychological Perspectives on Abortion and Reproductive Freedom.” We offer a critique of its underlying premise that abortion must be justified, identifying three substantive concerns. Then, we outline a better way to study abortion, one that draws on feminist and reproductive justice scholarship by: centering the lived experience of real people and their needs; holding that it is a fundamental human right of people to reproduce if and when they desire; and conducting research that benefits people, with a focus on those who are socially marginalized.","PeriodicalId":75331,"journal":{"name":"Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Problem with “Justifying” Abortion: Why Real Reproductive Justice Cannot Be Achieved by Theorizing the Legitimacy of Abortion\",\"authors\":\"K. Kimport, M. McLemore\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03610926.2021.1999587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is a commentary on Adair and Lozano’s (2021) article “Adaptive choice: Psychological Perspectives on Abortion and Reproductive Freedom.” We offer a critique of its underlying premise that abortion must be justified, identifying three substantive concerns. Then, we outline a better way to study abortion, one that draws on feminist and reproductive justice scholarship by: centering the lived experience of real people and their needs; holding that it is a fundamental human right of people to reproduce if and when they desire; and conducting research that benefits people, with a focus on those who are socially marginalized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2021.1999587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2021.1999587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这是对Adair和Lozano(2021)的文章《适应性选择:堕胎和生育自由的心理学视角》的评论。我们对它的基本前提——堕胎必须是正当的——提出了批评,指出了三个实质性的问题。然后,我们概述了一种更好的研究堕胎的方法,一种借鉴女权主义和生殖正义学术的方法:以真实的人的生活经历和他们的需求为中心;认为生育是人类的一项基本人权,只要他们愿意,随时都可以生育;开展有利于人们的研究,重点关注那些被社会边缘化的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Problem with “Justifying” Abortion: Why Real Reproductive Justice Cannot Be Achieved by Theorizing the Legitimacy of Abortion
This is a commentary on Adair and Lozano’s (2021) article “Adaptive choice: Psychological Perspectives on Abortion and Reproductive Freedom.” We offer a critique of its underlying premise that abortion must be justified, identifying three substantive concerns. Then, we outline a better way to study abortion, one that draws on feminist and reproductive justice scholarship by: centering the lived experience of real people and their needs; holding that it is a fundamental human right of people to reproduce if and when they desire; and conducting research that benefits people, with a focus on those who are socially marginalized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptation and Reflection in the Transition to Parenthood for Women With Risk Factors for Early Parenting Difficulties Who Participated in the STAR Mums Program A Bother or a Benefit? How Contraceptive Users Balance the Trade-Offs Between Preferred Menstrual Bleeding Patterns and Preferred Contraceptive Methods in India, South Africa, and the United States Healthy Body, Healthy Mind: Exploring the Mental Health Implications of Comprehensive Sex Education Pregnancy Preparation Among Women and Their Partners in the UK: How Common Is It and What Do People Do? Waging War on the Women: A Review of The Trials of Nina McCall: Sex, Surveillance, and the Decades-Long Government Plan to Imprison "Promiscuous" Women Stern, S. W. (2019). The Trials of Nina McCall: Sex, Surveillance, and the Decades-Long Government Plan to Imprison “Promiscuous” Women. Beacon Press. ISBN: 9780807021859, Paperback: $19.00
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1