新南威尔士州1880年的世俗主义、种族、宗教和公共教育法案

IF 0.6 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES History of Education Review Pub Date : 2019-03-11 DOI:10.1108/HER-07-2018-0019
R. Low
{"title":"新南威尔士州1880年的世俗主义、种族、宗教和公共教育法案","authors":"R. Low","doi":"10.1108/HER-07-2018-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThrough a political genealogy, the purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how the institutionalisation of the so-called “secular principle” in NSW state schools in the late-nineteenth century, which is commonly assumed to be a historical moment when religious neutrality was enshrined in public education, was overdetermined by the politics of racialisation and ethno-nationalism.Design/methodology/approachThe historiographical method used here is labelled “political genealogy”. This approach foregrounds how every social order and norm is contingent on political struggles that have shaped its form over time. This includes foregrounding the acts of exclusion that constitute any social order and norm.FindingsThe secular principle institutionalised in the NSW Public Instruction Act of 1880, far from being the “neutral” solution to sectarian conflict, was in fact a product of anti-Catholic sentiment fuelled by the racialisation of Irish Catholicism and ethno-nationalist anxieties about its presence in the colony.Originality/valueThis paper makes clear that “the secular” in secular schooling is neither a product of historical and moral “progress” from a more “primitive” state to a more progressive one, nor a principle of neutrality that stands outside of particular historical and political relations of power. Thus, it encourages a more pragmatic and supple understanding of “the secular” in education. It also invites both advocates and critics of secular education to adapt their arguments based on changing historical circumstances, and to justify the exclusions that such arguments imply without recourse to transcendent principles.","PeriodicalId":43049,"journal":{"name":"History of Education Review","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secularism, race, religion and the Public Instruction Act of 1880 in NSW\",\"authors\":\"R. Low\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/HER-07-2018-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThrough a political genealogy, the purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how the institutionalisation of the so-called “secular principle” in NSW state schools in the late-nineteenth century, which is commonly assumed to be a historical moment when religious neutrality was enshrined in public education, was overdetermined by the politics of racialisation and ethno-nationalism.Design/methodology/approachThe historiographical method used here is labelled “political genealogy”. This approach foregrounds how every social order and norm is contingent on political struggles that have shaped its form over time. This includes foregrounding the acts of exclusion that constitute any social order and norm.FindingsThe secular principle institutionalised in the NSW Public Instruction Act of 1880, far from being the “neutral” solution to sectarian conflict, was in fact a product of anti-Catholic sentiment fuelled by the racialisation of Irish Catholicism and ethno-nationalist anxieties about its presence in the colony.Originality/valueThis paper makes clear that “the secular” in secular schooling is neither a product of historical and moral “progress” from a more “primitive” state to a more progressive one, nor a principle of neutrality that stands outside of particular historical and political relations of power. Thus, it encourages a more pragmatic and supple understanding of “the secular” in education. It also invites both advocates and critics of secular education to adapt their arguments based on changing historical circumstances, and to justify the exclusions that such arguments imply without recourse to transcendent principles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Education Review\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/HER-07-2018-0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HER-07-2018-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

通过政治谱系,本文的目的是展示19世纪后期新南威尔士州州立学校所谓的“世俗原则”的制度化,这通常被认为是宗教中立被庄严地置于公共教育中的历史时刻,是如何被种族化和民族主义政治过度决定的。设计/方法/途径这里使用的史学方法被称为“政治谱系学”。这种方法强调了每一种社会秩序和规范是如何取决于政治斗争的,政治斗争随着时间的推移塑造了它的形式。这包括突出构成任何社会秩序和规范的排斥行为。1880年《新南威尔士州公共教育法案》(NSW Public Instruction Act)中确立的世俗原则,远非宗派冲突的“中立”解决方案,实际上是反天主教情绪的产物,这种情绪是由爱尔兰天主教的种族化和对其在殖民地存在的民族主义焦虑所推动的。原创性/价值本文明确指出,世俗教育中的“世俗”既不是历史和道德“进步”的产物,从一个更“原始”的国家到一个更进步的国家,也不是站在特定的历史和政治权力关系之外的中立原则。因此,它鼓励对教育中的“世俗”有更务实和灵活的理解。它还邀请世俗教育的倡导者和批评者根据不断变化的历史环境调整他们的论点,并证明这些论点所隐含的排除,而不诉诸于超越的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Secularism, race, religion and the Public Instruction Act of 1880 in NSW
PurposeThrough a political genealogy, the purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how the institutionalisation of the so-called “secular principle” in NSW state schools in the late-nineteenth century, which is commonly assumed to be a historical moment when religious neutrality was enshrined in public education, was overdetermined by the politics of racialisation and ethno-nationalism.Design/methodology/approachThe historiographical method used here is labelled “political genealogy”. This approach foregrounds how every social order and norm is contingent on political struggles that have shaped its form over time. This includes foregrounding the acts of exclusion that constitute any social order and norm.FindingsThe secular principle institutionalised in the NSW Public Instruction Act of 1880, far from being the “neutral” solution to sectarian conflict, was in fact a product of anti-Catholic sentiment fuelled by the racialisation of Irish Catholicism and ethno-nationalist anxieties about its presence in the colony.Originality/valueThis paper makes clear that “the secular” in secular schooling is neither a product of historical and moral “progress” from a more “primitive” state to a more progressive one, nor a principle of neutrality that stands outside of particular historical and political relations of power. Thus, it encourages a more pragmatic and supple understanding of “the secular” in education. It also invites both advocates and critics of secular education to adapt their arguments based on changing historical circumstances, and to justify the exclusions that such arguments imply without recourse to transcendent principles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
History of Education Review
History of Education Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The demise of school-developed elective courses in NSW: a case study in centralisation “A pleasant walk on the Pakihi”: ecological orientations in mid-century nature study Enchanting things: the scientific communication of Julius Sumner Miller The Endeavour scholarships program in the era of the Asian century: promise unfulfilled Changing policy, changing plans: responses to the end of fee-free education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1