Sylvester Nweze Onuegbunam, Ezenwaeze Malachy Nwaeze, Leo Clinton Chukwu
{"title":"尼日利亚埃努古ESUT教学医院舌下与直肠给药米索前列醇预防有危险因素妇女原发性产后出血的比较研究","authors":"Sylvester Nweze Onuegbunam, Ezenwaeze Malachy Nwaeze, Leo Clinton Chukwu","doi":"10.24940/ijird/2023/v12/i3/mar23020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Post-partum haemorrhage is a major cause of maternal death globally but more in low-income countries. While various studies recognized the efficacy of misoprostol in decreasing intraoperative blood loss, there is no consensus on the most effective route of administration of misoprostol. \nObjective: This study compared the effect of sublingual misoprostol with rectal misoprostol in preventing primary post-partum haemorrhage in women with risk factor(s) to PPH. \nMethodology: This is a comparative study that involved 200 participants who were randomized to two groups by 1:1 computer-based randomization (group A & group B). Each participant in group A received a 600mcg sublingual misoprostol plus rectal placebo, and participants in group B received a 600mcg rectal misoprostol plus sublingual placebo after delivery. The delivery mat already in use and soaked with liquor was removed once delivery was imminent, a new pre-weighed mat was replaced under the patient's buttocks, and also a pre-weighed sanitary pad was placed in her vulva to collect all the blood loss. The need for additional uterotonics and blood transfusion was assessed, and findings were documented appropriately in the proforma. Blood loss throughout a period of 24 hours after the delivery was measured by the gravimetric method. Weight gain from the sanitary pad/ delivery mat was calculated as 1g = 1 ml. The sanitary pad/mat was weighed in triplicate, and the mean of the three weights was entered into the database. The difference was the amount of blood loss, assuming 1g to be equivalent to 1 ml of blood. \nResult: The median 24-hour post-partum blood loss was less in sublingual group when compared with the rectal group (110ml vs 170ml) P=0. 001.The mean post-partum Hb was higher in sublingual group 10.00±1.21 vs 9.00± 0.61 P=0.30. Both sublingual and rectal routes of misoprostol administration were effective in preventing PPH, P-value=1.0 and there was no indication for extra-uterotonic or blood transfusion. \nConclusion: It is concluded that even though sublingually and rectally administered misoprostol showed equal efficacy in preventing PPH, sublingual route is associated with less blood loss. \n ","PeriodicalId":14101,"journal":{"name":"International journal of innovative research and development","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Sublingual versus Rectal Route of Misoprostol Administration in Prevention of Primary Post-partum Haemorrhage in Women with Risk Factors in ESUT Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Sylvester Nweze Onuegbunam, Ezenwaeze Malachy Nwaeze, Leo Clinton Chukwu\",\"doi\":\"10.24940/ijird/2023/v12/i3/mar23020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Post-partum haemorrhage is a major cause of maternal death globally but more in low-income countries. While various studies recognized the efficacy of misoprostol in decreasing intraoperative blood loss, there is no consensus on the most effective route of administration of misoprostol. \\nObjective: This study compared the effect of sublingual misoprostol with rectal misoprostol in preventing primary post-partum haemorrhage in women with risk factor(s) to PPH. \\nMethodology: This is a comparative study that involved 200 participants who were randomized to two groups by 1:1 computer-based randomization (group A & group B). Each participant in group A received a 600mcg sublingual misoprostol plus rectal placebo, and participants in group B received a 600mcg rectal misoprostol plus sublingual placebo after delivery. The delivery mat already in use and soaked with liquor was removed once delivery was imminent, a new pre-weighed mat was replaced under the patient's buttocks, and also a pre-weighed sanitary pad was placed in her vulva to collect all the blood loss. The need for additional uterotonics and blood transfusion was assessed, and findings were documented appropriately in the proforma. Blood loss throughout a period of 24 hours after the delivery was measured by the gravimetric method. Weight gain from the sanitary pad/ delivery mat was calculated as 1g = 1 ml. The sanitary pad/mat was weighed in triplicate, and the mean of the three weights was entered into the database. The difference was the amount of blood loss, assuming 1g to be equivalent to 1 ml of blood. \\nResult: The median 24-hour post-partum blood loss was less in sublingual group when compared with the rectal group (110ml vs 170ml) P=0. 001.The mean post-partum Hb was higher in sublingual group 10.00±1.21 vs 9.00± 0.61 P=0.30. Both sublingual and rectal routes of misoprostol administration were effective in preventing PPH, P-value=1.0 and there was no indication for extra-uterotonic or blood transfusion. \\nConclusion: It is concluded that even though sublingually and rectally administered misoprostol showed equal efficacy in preventing PPH, sublingual route is associated with less blood loss. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":14101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of innovative research and development\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of innovative research and development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24940/ijird/2023/v12/i3/mar23020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of innovative research and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24940/ijird/2023/v12/i3/mar23020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:产后出血是全球孕产妇死亡的一个主要原因,但更多发生在低收入国家。虽然各种研究都承认米索前列醇在减少术中出血量方面的功效,但对米索前列醇最有效的给药途径尚无共识。目的:本研究比较舌下米索前列醇与直肠米索前列醇对有PPH危险因素的妇女预防原发性产后出血的效果。方法:这是一项涉及200名参与者的比较研究,他们通过1:1的计算机随机化随机分为两组(a组和B组)。a组的每个参与者在分娩后接受600微克舌下米索前列醇加直肠安慰剂,B组的参与者接受600微克直肠米索前列醇加舌下安慰剂。一旦即将分娩,已经使用并浸泡过液体的分娩垫就被移除,在患者臀部下更换新的预称重垫子,并在其外阴内放置一个预称重的卫生垫以收集所有失血。评估了额外子宫强张和输血的需要,并在形式表中适当地记录了结果。用重量法测量分娩后24小时内的出血量。卫生巾/分娩垫的体重增加计算为1g = 1ml。卫生巾/分娩垫称重一式三份,并将三份重量的平均值输入数据库。差别在于失血量,假设1g相当于1ml血。结果:舌下组产后24小时中位出血量低于直肠组(110ml vs 170ml) P=0。001.舌下组平均产后Hb(10.00±1.21)高于舌下组(9.00±0.61)(P=0.30)。米索前列醇舌下和直肠给药均能有效预防PPH, p值=1.0,无子宫外强直和输血指征。结论:尽管舌下和直肠给药米索前列醇预防PPH的效果相同,但舌下给药可减少失血量。
Comparative Study of Sublingual versus Rectal Route of Misoprostol Administration in Prevention of Primary Post-partum Haemorrhage in Women with Risk Factors in ESUT Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria
Background: Post-partum haemorrhage is a major cause of maternal death globally but more in low-income countries. While various studies recognized the efficacy of misoprostol in decreasing intraoperative blood loss, there is no consensus on the most effective route of administration of misoprostol.
Objective: This study compared the effect of sublingual misoprostol with rectal misoprostol in preventing primary post-partum haemorrhage in women with risk factor(s) to PPH.
Methodology: This is a comparative study that involved 200 participants who were randomized to two groups by 1:1 computer-based randomization (group A & group B). Each participant in group A received a 600mcg sublingual misoprostol plus rectal placebo, and participants in group B received a 600mcg rectal misoprostol plus sublingual placebo after delivery. The delivery mat already in use and soaked with liquor was removed once delivery was imminent, a new pre-weighed mat was replaced under the patient's buttocks, and also a pre-weighed sanitary pad was placed in her vulva to collect all the blood loss. The need for additional uterotonics and blood transfusion was assessed, and findings were documented appropriately in the proforma. Blood loss throughout a period of 24 hours after the delivery was measured by the gravimetric method. Weight gain from the sanitary pad/ delivery mat was calculated as 1g = 1 ml. The sanitary pad/mat was weighed in triplicate, and the mean of the three weights was entered into the database. The difference was the amount of blood loss, assuming 1g to be equivalent to 1 ml of blood.
Result: The median 24-hour post-partum blood loss was less in sublingual group when compared with the rectal group (110ml vs 170ml) P=0. 001.The mean post-partum Hb was higher in sublingual group 10.00±1.21 vs 9.00± 0.61 P=0.30. Both sublingual and rectal routes of misoprostol administration were effective in preventing PPH, P-value=1.0 and there was no indication for extra-uterotonic or blood transfusion.
Conclusion: It is concluded that even though sublingually and rectally administered misoprostol showed equal efficacy in preventing PPH, sublingual route is associated with less blood loss.