信息管理在第二语言学术写作语法评价中的作用:一个探索性案例研究

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Writing & Pedagogy Pub Date : 2015-07-17 DOI:10.1558/WAP.V7I2-3.26045
Heike Neumann
{"title":"信息管理在第二语言学术写作语法评价中的作用:一个探索性案例研究","authors":"Heike Neumann","doi":"10.1558/WAP.V7I2-3.26045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information management of discourse – the ability of a writer to use linguistic forms to organize and present information in a written text – is a key component of second language (L2) ability models in the language assessment literature (e.g., Canale & Swain, 1980; Weigle, 2002), but Purpura’s (2004) language ability model developed specifically for assessment purposes is the only one that considers it to be part of the ability to use grammar accurately and meaningfully when producing a text in an L2. The current study investigated whether L2 academic writing teachers consider information management of discourse as an assessment criterion when assessing grammar in L2 academic texts. Fourteen students in an academic English as a second language writing course at an English-medium university in Canada and their teacher participated in this case study. Students’ essay exam scripts were collected, and the Theme-Rheme progression (TRP) patterns and links (Danes, 1974) as well as the distribution of new and given information (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004) in these essays were analyzed. Pearson correlation coefficients between the teacher-assigned grammar grade and the results from the TRP and information distribution analyses were calculated. The findings indicate that information management of discourse indeed forms part of the assessment criteria for grammar in academic writing for the teacher in this study. The implications of this finding for L2 writing pedagogy are discussed.","PeriodicalId":42573,"journal":{"name":"Writing & Pedagogy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Information Management in the Assessment of Grammar in L2 Academic Writing: An Exploratory Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Heike Neumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/WAP.V7I2-3.26045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Information management of discourse – the ability of a writer to use linguistic forms to organize and present information in a written text – is a key component of second language (L2) ability models in the language assessment literature (e.g., Canale & Swain, 1980; Weigle, 2002), but Purpura’s (2004) language ability model developed specifically for assessment purposes is the only one that considers it to be part of the ability to use grammar accurately and meaningfully when producing a text in an L2. The current study investigated whether L2 academic writing teachers consider information management of discourse as an assessment criterion when assessing grammar in L2 academic texts. Fourteen students in an academic English as a second language writing course at an English-medium university in Canada and their teacher participated in this case study. Students’ essay exam scripts were collected, and the Theme-Rheme progression (TRP) patterns and links (Danes, 1974) as well as the distribution of new and given information (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004) in these essays were analyzed. Pearson correlation coefficients between the teacher-assigned grammar grade and the results from the TRP and information distribution analyses were calculated. The findings indicate that information management of discourse indeed forms part of the assessment criteria for grammar in academic writing for the teacher in this study. The implications of this finding for L2 writing pedagogy are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Writing & Pedagogy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Writing & Pedagogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/WAP.V7I2-3.26045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing & Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/WAP.V7I2-3.26045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

话语的信息管理——作者在书面文本中使用语言形式组织和呈现信息的能力——是语言评估文献中第二语言(L2)能力模型的关键组成部分(例如,Canale & Swain, 1980;Weigle, 2002),但是Purpura(2004)专门为评估目的而开发的语言能力模型是唯一一个认为它是在第二语言中准确和有意义地使用语法的能力的一部分。本研究调查了二语学术写作教师在评估二语学术篇章的语法时,是否将话语的信息管理作为一种评估标准。加拿大一所英语大学的14名学生和他们的老师参与了以英语为第二语言的学术写作课程的案例研究。收集学生的作文考试脚本,并分析这些文章中的主题-述位进展(TRP)模式和链接(Danes, 1974)以及新信息和给定信息的分布(Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004)。计算教师分配的语法成绩与TRP和信息分布分析结果之间的Pearson相关系数。研究结果表明,在本研究中,话语的信息管理确实构成了教师学术写作语法评估标准的一部分。本文讨论了这一发现对第二语言写作教学的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Role of Information Management in the Assessment of Grammar in L2 Academic Writing: An Exploratory Case Study
Information management of discourse – the ability of a writer to use linguistic forms to organize and present information in a written text – is a key component of second language (L2) ability models in the language assessment literature (e.g., Canale & Swain, 1980; Weigle, 2002), but Purpura’s (2004) language ability model developed specifically for assessment purposes is the only one that considers it to be part of the ability to use grammar accurately and meaningfully when producing a text in an L2. The current study investigated whether L2 academic writing teachers consider information management of discourse as an assessment criterion when assessing grammar in L2 academic texts. Fourteen students in an academic English as a second language writing course at an English-medium university in Canada and their teacher participated in this case study. Students’ essay exam scripts were collected, and the Theme-Rheme progression (TRP) patterns and links (Danes, 1974) as well as the distribution of new and given information (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004) in these essays were analyzed. Pearson correlation coefficients between the teacher-assigned grammar grade and the results from the TRP and information distribution analyses were calculated. The findings indicate that information management of discourse indeed forms part of the assessment criteria for grammar in academic writing for the teacher in this study. The implications of this finding for L2 writing pedagogy are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Writing & Pedagogy
Writing & Pedagogy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Writing and identity: Promoting critical discourse amidst double consciousness Writing as resistance in an age of demagoguery Making sense of resistance in an afterschool tutoring program: Learning from volunteer writing tutors Stray dogs: Interviews with working-class writers, edited by Daniel M. Mendoza Schools, sexual violence, and safety: Adolescent girls and writing resistance at an afterschool program in suburban Mumbai
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1