{"title":"风险评估中的风险","authors":"K. Dudleston","doi":"10.1192/PB.37.11.372C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Szmukler et al [1][1] should be warmly congratulated on their clear, authoritative critique of the recent developments in the law of England and Wales concerning mental health. Their analysis of the assessment of risk is particularly telling: ‘Rare events are virtually impossible to predict with","PeriodicalId":89639,"journal":{"name":"The psychiatrist","volume":"11 1","pages":"372-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The risk in risk assessment\",\"authors\":\"K. Dudleston\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/PB.37.11.372C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Szmukler et al [1][1] should be warmly congratulated on their clear, authoritative critique of the recent developments in the law of England and Wales concerning mental health. Their analysis of the assessment of risk is particularly telling: ‘Rare events are virtually impossible to predict with\",\"PeriodicalId\":89639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The psychiatrist\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"372-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The psychiatrist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/PB.37.11.372C\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The psychiatrist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/PB.37.11.372C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Szmukler et al [1][1] should be warmly congratulated on their clear, authoritative critique of the recent developments in the law of England and Wales concerning mental health. Their analysis of the assessment of risk is particularly telling: ‘Rare events are virtually impossible to predict with