加密货币洗钱:门户开放与监管辩证法

Daniel Dupuis, Kimberly Gleason
{"title":"加密货币洗钱:门户开放与监管辩证法","authors":"Daniel Dupuis, Kimberly Gleason","doi":"10.1108/jfc-06-2020-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to describe the opportunities and limitations of cryptocurrencies as a tool for money laundering through six currently available “open doors” (exchange mechanisms). The authors link the regulatory dialectic paradigm to KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) evasion techniques, highlight six tactics to launder funds with virtual assets and investigate potential law enforcement and regulatory alternatives used to reduce the incidence of money laundering with digital coins. <br><br>Design/methodology/approach: The methodology used is the analysis of significant recent events, the availability of “fintech” crime-fighting tools, and a literature review focusing on the application of the Regulatory Dialectic to existing crypto-asset markets that make them compelling to money launderers. <br><br>Findings: We examine the illicit use of cryptocurrency through Kane’s Regulatory Dialectic paradigm, identify a number of avenues that are still available for those seeking to launder money using digitized coins, review recently “closed doors” and make recommendations regarding the regulation of crypto-related markets that may assist in making them less desirable for potential criminals. <br><br>Originality/value: To the authors’ knowledge, there are yet no broad overview regarding the feasibility of money laundering across crypto-related assets within the paradigm of the Regulatory Dialectic.<br>","PeriodicalId":13701,"journal":{"name":"International Corporate Finance eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Money Laundering with Cryptocurrency: Open Doors and the Regulatory Dialectic\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Dupuis, Kimberly Gleason\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jfc-06-2020-0113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to describe the opportunities and limitations of cryptocurrencies as a tool for money laundering through six currently available “open doors” (exchange mechanisms). The authors link the regulatory dialectic paradigm to KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) evasion techniques, highlight six tactics to launder funds with virtual assets and investigate potential law enforcement and regulatory alternatives used to reduce the incidence of money laundering with digital coins. <br><br>Design/methodology/approach: The methodology used is the analysis of significant recent events, the availability of “fintech” crime-fighting tools, and a literature review focusing on the application of the Regulatory Dialectic to existing crypto-asset markets that make them compelling to money launderers. <br><br>Findings: We examine the illicit use of cryptocurrency through Kane’s Regulatory Dialectic paradigm, identify a number of avenues that are still available for those seeking to launder money using digitized coins, review recently “closed doors” and make recommendations regarding the regulation of crypto-related markets that may assist in making them less desirable for potential criminals. <br><br>Originality/value: To the authors’ knowledge, there are yet no broad overview regarding the feasibility of money laundering across crypto-related assets within the paradigm of the Regulatory Dialectic.<br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Corporate Finance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Corporate Finance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-06-2020-0113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Corporate Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-06-2020-0113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

本研究的目的是通过六个目前可用的“开放的门”(交换机制)来描述加密货币作为洗钱工具的机会和局限性。作者将监管辩证法范式与KYC(了解你的客户)和AML(反洗钱)逃避技术联系起来,强调了用虚拟资产洗钱的六种策略,并调查了用于减少使用数字货币洗钱的潜在执法和监管替代方案。设计/方法/方法:使用的方法是对近期重大事件的分析,“金融科技”打击犯罪工具的可用性,以及对监管辩证法在现有加密资产市场中的应用的文献综述,这些市场对洗钱者来说是有吸引力的。研究结果:我们通过凯恩的监管辩证法范式研究了加密货币的非法使用,为那些寻求使用数字硬币洗钱的人确定了一些仍然可用的途径,审查了最近的“闭门不出”,并就加密相关市场的监管提出了建议,这些建议可能有助于降低潜在罪犯对加密货币的需求。原创性/价值:据作者所知,在监管辩证法的范式下,还没有关于跨加密相关资产洗钱的可行性的广泛概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Money Laundering with Cryptocurrency: Open Doors and the Regulatory Dialectic
The purpose of this study is to describe the opportunities and limitations of cryptocurrencies as a tool for money laundering through six currently available “open doors” (exchange mechanisms). The authors link the regulatory dialectic paradigm to KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) evasion techniques, highlight six tactics to launder funds with virtual assets and investigate potential law enforcement and regulatory alternatives used to reduce the incidence of money laundering with digital coins.

Design/methodology/approach: The methodology used is the analysis of significant recent events, the availability of “fintech” crime-fighting tools, and a literature review focusing on the application of the Regulatory Dialectic to existing crypto-asset markets that make them compelling to money launderers.

Findings: We examine the illicit use of cryptocurrency through Kane’s Regulatory Dialectic paradigm, identify a number of avenues that are still available for those seeking to launder money using digitized coins, review recently “closed doors” and make recommendations regarding the regulation of crypto-related markets that may assist in making them less desirable for potential criminals.

Originality/value: To the authors’ knowledge, there are yet no broad overview regarding the feasibility of money laundering across crypto-related assets within the paradigm of the Regulatory Dialectic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Supply Chain Channel of Government Credit Pass-through Two Investors, Two Trees, Two Goods The Role of Exchange Rate in Monetary Policy Rules: A Welfare-Based Re-Examination Home–Host Distance in Governance Quality, Foreign Banks’ Lending, and Emerging Host Markets’ Resilience The ESG Home Bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1