胎儿多普勒血流速度测定对生长受限胎儿围产期结局的意义研究

Vaibhav Kumar, G. Sharma, Saherish Khan, A. Singhania, Shraddha Singhania, K. Rao
{"title":"胎儿多普勒血流速度测定对生长受限胎儿围产期结局的意义研究","authors":"Vaibhav Kumar, G. Sharma, Saherish Khan, A. Singhania, Shraddha Singhania, K. Rao","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10016-1153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate clinically suspected cases of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) for Doppler study of uterine artery, umbilical artery, and fetal middle cerebral artery. To compare the various indices of the three vessels in predicting perinatal outcome. To evaluate the positive predictive value among these parameters. To compare the Doppler findings with fetal outcome. Materials and methods: One hundred and two singleton pregnancies complicated by IUGR and severe preeclampsia or both were prospectively examined with Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and umbilical vein which were compared with 104 uncomplicated pregnancies that formed the control group. Observation and Results: One hundred and two singleton pregnancies included in the study population had at least one major or minor adverse outcome. Major adverse outcome criteria included perinatal deaths – including intrauterine and early neonatal deaths, etc. Minor outcomes included cesarean delivery for fetal distress, APGAR score below 7 at 5 minutes, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit for treatment. Conclusion: Low diastolic and high indices characterize the pregnancies with abnormal outcomes. The uterine artery had a better sensitivity and specificity as compared with the umbilical arteries and diastolic notch had the highest sensitivity and specificity. Doppler also provides a noninvasive method of assessing the fetal and maternal circulation during pregnancy.","PeriodicalId":38998,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infertility and Fetal Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"83-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of the Significance of Fetal Doppler Flow Velocimetry in the Perinatal Outcome of Growth-restricted Fetuses\",\"authors\":\"Vaibhav Kumar, G. Sharma, Saherish Khan, A. Singhania, Shraddha Singhania, K. Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10016-1153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To evaluate clinically suspected cases of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) for Doppler study of uterine artery, umbilical artery, and fetal middle cerebral artery. To compare the various indices of the three vessels in predicting perinatal outcome. To evaluate the positive predictive value among these parameters. To compare the Doppler findings with fetal outcome. Materials and methods: One hundred and two singleton pregnancies complicated by IUGR and severe preeclampsia or both were prospectively examined with Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and umbilical vein which were compared with 104 uncomplicated pregnancies that formed the control group. Observation and Results: One hundred and two singleton pregnancies included in the study population had at least one major or minor adverse outcome. Major adverse outcome criteria included perinatal deaths – including intrauterine and early neonatal deaths, etc. Minor outcomes included cesarean delivery for fetal distress, APGAR score below 7 at 5 minutes, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit for treatment. Conclusion: Low diastolic and high indices characterize the pregnancies with abnormal outcomes. The uterine artery had a better sensitivity and specificity as compared with the umbilical arteries and diastolic notch had the highest sensitivity and specificity. Doppler also provides a noninvasive method of assessing the fetal and maternal circulation during pregnancy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Infertility and Fetal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"83-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Infertility and Fetal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10016-1153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infertility and Fetal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10016-1153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨临床疑似宫内生长受限(IUGR)的子宫动脉、脐动脉、胎儿大脑中动脉多普勒检查的价值。比较三支血管各项指标对围产儿预后的预测价值。评价这些参数之间的正预测值。比较多普勒检查结果与胎儿结局。材料与方法:对102例合并IUGR合并重度子痫前期或两者兼有的单胎妊娠进行脐动脉、大脑中动脉、脐静脉多普勒超声前瞻性检查,并与104例未合并妊娠的对照组进行比较。观察与结果:研究人群中有102例单胎妊娠至少有一种主要或次要的不良结局。主要不良结果标准包括围产期死亡——包括宫内和新生儿早期死亡等。次要结局包括因胎儿窘迫而剖宫产,5分钟时APGAR评分低于7分,入院新生儿重症监护病房治疗。结论:低舒张指数和高舒张指数是妊娠结局异常的特征。子宫动脉比脐动脉具有更好的敏感性和特异性,舒张切迹的敏感性和特异性最高。多普勒也提供了一个无创的方法来评估胎儿和母体循环在怀孕期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study of the Significance of Fetal Doppler Flow Velocimetry in the Perinatal Outcome of Growth-restricted Fetuses
Purpose: To evaluate clinically suspected cases of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) for Doppler study of uterine artery, umbilical artery, and fetal middle cerebral artery. To compare the various indices of the three vessels in predicting perinatal outcome. To evaluate the positive predictive value among these parameters. To compare the Doppler findings with fetal outcome. Materials and methods: One hundred and two singleton pregnancies complicated by IUGR and severe preeclampsia or both were prospectively examined with Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and umbilical vein which were compared with 104 uncomplicated pregnancies that formed the control group. Observation and Results: One hundred and two singleton pregnancies included in the study population had at least one major or minor adverse outcome. Major adverse outcome criteria included perinatal deaths – including intrauterine and early neonatal deaths, etc. Minor outcomes included cesarean delivery for fetal distress, APGAR score below 7 at 5 minutes, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit for treatment. Conclusion: Low diastolic and high indices characterize the pregnancies with abnormal outcomes. The uterine artery had a better sensitivity and specificity as compared with the umbilical arteries and diastolic notch had the highest sensitivity and specificity. Doppler also provides a noninvasive method of assessing the fetal and maternal circulation during pregnancy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound Detection of Fetal Structural Anomalies during First Trimester Nuchal Translucency Scan in Conjunction with Traditional 18–22 Weeks Anomaly Scan Impact of Prematuration Culture on Zygote Morphology In Vitro Maturation: An Early Clue to Embryo Competence Fetal Jacob Syndrome (47XYY): An Uncommon Association of Fetal Pulmonary Atresia with Ventricular Septal Defect Occurrence of Insulin Resistance with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss of Unknown Etiology in North Indian Hospital-based Women Population: A Pilot Study POSEIDONE 1 and 2: Probable Causes and Proposed Treatment Strategies? An Evidence-based Update
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1