炭疽菌的基因型及致病变异。malvae。

H. R. Kutcher, K. Mortensen
{"title":"炭疽菌的基因型及致病变异。malvae。","authors":"H. R. Kutcher, K. Mortensen","doi":"10.1080/07060661.1999.10600130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. malvae (C.g. malvae) is pathogenic on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) but does not cause sufficient damage or mortality to be considered as a biological control agent for this weed. Velvetleaf control might be increased if isolates of C.g. malvae with greater pathogenicity could be identified. C.g. malvae isolates from Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario (Canada) were examined to determine their genotypic and pathogenic variation. The random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique was used to determine differences among isolates based on the presence or absence of amplified DNA fragments. Isolates were also tested for variation in pathogenicity by stem injection of the pathogen into velvetleaf plants under controlled conditions. All isolates of C.g. malvae were highly pathogenic on velvetleaf. Differences in RAPD patterns were not obtained among C.g. malvae isolates. However, differences in RAPD patterns could be used to differentiate isolates of C.g. ma...","PeriodicalId":9607,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology-revue Canadienne De Phytopathologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genotypic and pathogenic variation of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f.sp. malvae.\",\"authors\":\"H. R. Kutcher, K. Mortensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07060661.1999.10600130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. malvae (C.g. malvae) is pathogenic on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) but does not cause sufficient damage or mortality to be considered as a biological control agent for this weed. Velvetleaf control might be increased if isolates of C.g. malvae with greater pathogenicity could be identified. C.g. malvae isolates from Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario (Canada) were examined to determine their genotypic and pathogenic variation. The random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique was used to determine differences among isolates based on the presence or absence of amplified DNA fragments. Isolates were also tested for variation in pathogenicity by stem injection of the pathogen into velvetleaf plants under controlled conditions. All isolates of C.g. malvae were highly pathogenic on velvetleaf. Differences in RAPD patterns were not obtained among C.g. malvae isolates. However, differences in RAPD patterns could be used to differentiate isolates of C.g. ma...\",\"PeriodicalId\":9607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology-revue Canadienne De Phytopathologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology-revue Canadienne De Phytopathologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.1999.10600130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology-revue Canadienne De Phytopathologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.1999.10600130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要/ Abstract摘要:炭疽病菌(Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. malvae, C.g. malvae)对棉叶(Abutilon theophrasti)具有致病性,但不会造成足够的危害或死亡,因此不能被认为是一种生物防治剂。如果能鉴定出致病性较强的malvae分离株,可能会增加对天鹅绒叶的控制。对来自萨斯喀彻温省、马尼托巴省和加拿大安大略省的C.g. malvae分离株进行了检测,以确定其基因型和致病变异。采用随机扩增多态性DNA (RAPD)技术,根据扩增DNA片段的存在与否来确定菌株之间的差异。在控制条件下,将病原菌茎注射到丝绒叶植物中,检测分离株的致病性变化。所有分离株均对丝绒叶具有高致病性。不同分离株间的RAPD模式没有差异。然而,RAPD模式的差异可以用来区分菌株。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genotypic and pathogenic variation of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f.sp. malvae.
Abstract Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. malvae (C.g. malvae) is pathogenic on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) but does not cause sufficient damage or mortality to be considered as a biological control agent for this weed. Velvetleaf control might be increased if isolates of C.g. malvae with greater pathogenicity could be identified. C.g. malvae isolates from Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario (Canada) were examined to determine their genotypic and pathogenic variation. The random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique was used to determine differences among isolates based on the presence or absence of amplified DNA fragments. Isolates were also tested for variation in pathogenicity by stem injection of the pathogen into velvetleaf plants under controlled conditions. All isolates of C.g. malvae were highly pathogenic on velvetleaf. Differences in RAPD patterns were not obtained among C.g. malvae isolates. However, differences in RAPD patterns could be used to differentiate isolates of C.g. ma...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fungi Canadenses No. 350: EPICHLOË GLYCERIAE Occurrence and virulence of Puccinia recondita in Canada in 1979 Biological control of postharvest diseases of peach with phyllosphere isolates of Pseudomonas syringae Severity of late blight tuber infection caused by US-1 and US-8 genotypes of Phytophthora infestans in 12 potato cultivars Reduction of potato scab, Verticillium wilt, and nematodes by soymeal and meat and bone meal in two Ontario potato fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1