新型粪钙保护蛋白家庭快速检测方法IBDoc的临床应用

M. Røer, M. Småstuen, A. Røseth
{"title":"新型粪钙保护蛋白家庭快速检测方法IBDoc的临床应用","authors":"M. Røer, M. Småstuen, A. Røseth","doi":"10.1097/POC.0000000000000192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this study was to examine sustained usability and adherence to a fecal calprotectin (FC) home-based rapid test in an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) monitoring program in clinical practice. Methods In total, 59 consecutive IBD outpatients were recruited. The participants were asked to measure FC with a home-based rapid test, IBDoc, every second month for a period of 14 months. At start and termination of this time period, they were invited to answer a questionnaire concerning the IBDoc device. The participants were also asked to deliver one stool sample for FC to be analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and analyze the same sample with the home-based FC test at start and termination. Results In total, one-third (34%) of the participants were adherent to the IBDoc program. No patient characteristics were significantly associated with being adherent. The home-based test correlated well with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method (Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.92, P < 0.001 and 0.74, P < 0.001, at study start and termination, respectively). After having used the IBDoc for over a year, all except for 1 of the 36 participants answering the follow-up questionnaire completely agreed with the statement “I would like to use IBDoc in the future.” Conclusions We found a low adherence to home-based FC measurements every second month for a period of 14 months. Nevertheless, all but 1 of the 36 participants who answered the follow-up questionnaire were interested in continuing using the IBDoc test.","PeriodicalId":20262,"journal":{"name":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","volume":"32 1","pages":"85 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability of IBDoc, a Novel Fecal Calprotectin Home-Based Rapid Test in Clinical Practice\",\"authors\":\"M. Røer, M. Småstuen, A. Røseth\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/POC.0000000000000192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of this study was to examine sustained usability and adherence to a fecal calprotectin (FC) home-based rapid test in an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) monitoring program in clinical practice. Methods In total, 59 consecutive IBD outpatients were recruited. The participants were asked to measure FC with a home-based rapid test, IBDoc, every second month for a period of 14 months. At start and termination of this time period, they were invited to answer a questionnaire concerning the IBDoc device. The participants were also asked to deliver one stool sample for FC to be analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and analyze the same sample with the home-based FC test at start and termination. Results In total, one-third (34%) of the participants were adherent to the IBDoc program. No patient characteristics were significantly associated with being adherent. The home-based test correlated well with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method (Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.92, P < 0.001 and 0.74, P < 0.001, at study start and termination, respectively). After having used the IBDoc for over a year, all except for 1 of the 36 participants answering the follow-up questionnaire completely agreed with the statement “I would like to use IBDoc in the future.” Conclusions We found a low adherence to home-based FC measurements every second month for a period of 14 months. Nevertheless, all but 1 of the 36 participants who answered the follow-up questionnaire were interested in continuing using the IBDoc test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"85 - 91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究的目的是在临床实践中检查在炎症性肠病(IBD)监测项目中粪便钙保护蛋白(FC)家庭快速检测的持续可用性和依从性。方法共招募59例连续IBD门诊患者。参与者被要求在14个月的时间里,每两个月用基于家庭的快速测试IBDoc来测量FC。在这段时间的开始和结束时,他们被邀请回答一份关于IBDoc装置的问卷。参与者还被要求提供一份粪便样本进行FC分析,用酶联免疫吸附法分析,并在开始和结束时用家庭FC测试分析同一样本。结果:总共有三分之一(34%)的参与者坚持IBDoc计划。没有患者特征与依从性显著相关。家庭检测与酶联免疫吸附法相关性良好(在研究开始和结束时,Spearman秩相关系数分别为0.92,P < 0.001和0.74,P < 0.001)。在使用IBDoc一年多后,36名回答随访问卷的参与者中,除了1人之外,其余的人都完全同意“我想在未来使用IBDoc”的说法。结论:我们发现,在14个月的时间里,每两个月进行一次家庭FC测量的依从性很低。然而,在36名回答了后续问卷的参与者中,除了1人之外,其他人都对继续使用IBDoc测试感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usability of IBDoc, a Novel Fecal Calprotectin Home-Based Rapid Test in Clinical Practice
Abstract The aim of this study was to examine sustained usability and adherence to a fecal calprotectin (FC) home-based rapid test in an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) monitoring program in clinical practice. Methods In total, 59 consecutive IBD outpatients were recruited. The participants were asked to measure FC with a home-based rapid test, IBDoc, every second month for a period of 14 months. At start and termination of this time period, they were invited to answer a questionnaire concerning the IBDoc device. The participants were also asked to deliver one stool sample for FC to be analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and analyze the same sample with the home-based FC test at start and termination. Results In total, one-third (34%) of the participants were adherent to the IBDoc program. No patient characteristics were significantly associated with being adherent. The home-based test correlated well with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method (Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.92, P < 0.001 and 0.74, P < 0.001, at study start and termination, respectively). After having used the IBDoc for over a year, all except for 1 of the 36 participants answering the follow-up questionnaire completely agreed with the statement “I would like to use IBDoc in the future.” Conclusions We found a low adherence to home-based FC measurements every second month for a period of 14 months. Nevertheless, all but 1 of the 36 participants who answered the follow-up questionnaire were interested in continuing using the IBDoc test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of International Normalized Ratio Results by Point-of-Care Device and Clinical Laboratory Analyzers in a Vascular Surgery Department Point-of-Care Testing in Hypercoagulable Conditions Managed With Warfarin Critical Care Nurses' Views and Experiences of Preanalytical Factors Influencing Point-of-Care Testing Rapid Assessment of Coagulation at the Point of Care With the Hemochron Signature Elite System Invited Product Profile: Detecting Antibodies for Lyme Disease at the Point of Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1